>>104932468
>It absolutely is, when it's competing with languages with 10x or 100x faster builds.
Languages competing with each other is not a practical aspect.

>>104932529
>who cares
Quite a few people
>its called code generators
It's not the same thing
>already in c++
C++ does not have destructive moves
>bad for chinese based languages
This is not true
>snake oil brain slop
Not an argument
>where
#[no_std], heap and unwinding are not required
>what
https://doc.rust-lang.org/rust-by-example/flow_control/match/destructuring.html
>c++ diod it better
C++ does not have pattern matching
>not variadic
Variadic tuples do not make them more ergonomic. They are also not very useful.
>waste of memeory and keeps variables freom going inr egisteters
There is no unnecessary overhead in tagged unions. There is also nothing stopping them from ending up in registers.
>ranges
Require more code and are limited
>anti feature just write the types or let it be dynamic
Not all types are nameable

Back | Go to board

Board:

/g/

Thread:

i finally realized that rust is just modern c++ with better syntax