>>105514441

>don't think AI won't

What does this mean? Account for the double negative

Are there any serious technological thinkers who don't think AI won't result in mass unemployment?

ChatGPT said:

Great question! Let's break down the sentence and the double negative:

"Are there any serious technological thinkers who don't think AI won't result in mass unemployment?"

There are two negatives here:

"don't think"

"won't result"

In English, a double negative often cancels out, but depending on context, it can either create confusion or imply a subtle nuance.
Interpretation:

"Don't think AI won't result in mass unemployment"
= Think AI will result in mass unemployment

So, rephrased in plain language, the question becomes:

"Are there any serious technological thinkers who believe AI won’t result in mass unemployment?"

In other words:

Are there experts who are optimistic that AI won't take a lot of jobs?

Short answer:

Yes, some serious technological thinkers believe that AI won’t lead to mass unemployment.

Back | Go to board

Board:

/g/

Thread:

Are there any serious technological thinkers who don't think AI won't result in mass unemployment?