>>33557526
>antiwoman
Could you explain why the feature feels antiwoman to you? So far the complaints I've heard seem to be from upset men. I'll admit that I didn't anticipate the possibility of that response, and I still don't understand it. So I'm not sure if those men are just a vocal minority and the feature is working fine for just about everyone. Maybe the upset men aren't drawing the inference that a reply rate of 1% means that the person got at least 100 intros and is too overwhelmed to reply to them all. Maybe those men feel entitled to a response anyway.

>>33557473
This is the response I expected from most users

>>33557405
Can you explain why it makes women look bad? Do you want women to reply to every man, even if just to say they're not interested?

>>33557633
Explain, please.

A lot of people have been asking for this feature for a while, so I'm surprised by some of the complaints. Let's run some polls!

>Should the "gives replies to" stat appear on people's profiles?
https://strawpoll.com/GeZARBNWVyV

>Should the "gets replies to" stat appear on people's profiles?
https://strawpoll.com/7MZ0kNzvmgo

Back | Go to board

Board:

/soc/

Thread:

Verification Required EditionDuolicious is an online dating app, but based and true love-pilled.>Duolicious…

Verification Required Edition
Duolicious is an online dating app, but based and true love-pilled.
>Duolicious…