>>3647632
>There wasn't anything good about new ds2 narrative, come on
well the big thing is that it wasnt just a literal re-tread of DS1, which is all that DS3 accomplished

id argue its THE game that actually establishes what the undead curse is, and what it does, more than any of the rest of the series. and it didnt even have to be loosely implied in vague item descriptions. you talk to the king after getting the crowns and he actually explains shit for once
it also filled out all the pointlessly vague shit that DS1s DLC left unanswered about the abyss, filled out what exactly the dark soul is

idk i could prolly ramble on for a while if i had just replayed it. its got some of the most important story shit in the series. the fact people can say its story is irrelevant or worth skipping, imo, shows they prolly didnt play it. or they just ungabunga did whatever the herald told them to and didnt question anything/didnt do the DLCs

>>3647635
>same old ideas from 1 with a more fairytale coat of paint. It wouldn't be wrong.
other than the mechanics issues, this was my biggest complaint
i felt like i was getting nostalgia-b8d by some jap wankfest retard over a game that i had JUST played. my first playthrough i literally dropped it and decided to go back and replay 1 instead. seemed like thats what miyazaki wanted me to do, so i did

Back | Go to board

Board:

/vrpg/

Thread:

Dark Souls - Elden Ring