>>32983470
>No one thinks an older woman and younger one are equal value and objectively they're not unless maybe the old woman isn't too old, took care of herself and had good genes.
Firstly, I don't know what you mean by "value". Secondly, value judgements are by definition subjective so I have no clue how you can objectively say that something has more value than another.

>The women not seeing it as "gifting their youth" to these men doesn't change that's pretty much what they're doing.
You haven't explained this. If two 19 year olds meet and are in a relationship together, mutually engaging in an intimate connection, how is youth being "given" to the man? Is his youth also not being given? The way you're portraying this isn't adding up because the only way to not "give" your youth to someone is to not be in a relationship with anybody which is a silly, unrealistic alternative.

>Objectively both mentally/baggage wise from various failed relationships and physically from the basic concept of aging as we know it older women are measurably inferior to younger ones
You keep giving me your opinion about things and saying "objectively" afterwards and I don't think you know what the word means. Its not objective, anon. Not even remotely.

>So "her best years" ARE most likely her years in her late teens and twenties.
I think the issue is you have a strong opinion about this but you keep framing it as "objective" and you're not understanding why nothing you're saying is objective. The term "best years" is extremely subjective. For a lot of people, especially career focused people, the "best years" aren't until their 30s. I have no clue how you can objectively determine what the "best years" of someone's life is.

>You have to be detached or unaware of reality to deny shit like this.
"My opinion is right cause its like, totally obvious" is not an argument.

Back | Go to board

Board:

/adv/

Thread:

Is it okay to settle for a woman in her 30s if girls your age are too immature for long term relationships?