>>4891935
It's the naturalistic fallacy along with a healthy dose of "anything thats fun is bad" and generic hippie nature worship
>their life in the wild is natural, so it must be better than HUMAN ENSLAVEMENT!
>their life in the wild: brutalized by conspecifics for eating out of turn, brutalized by other species for being on the wrong side of the piss line to too close to the food they've claimed, parasitized, sickened, and eaten alive by crows as they lay dying assuming a larger animal doesn't finish them off slightly faster (nothing, and i mean nothing, in nature makes sure its prey is dead - the legendary "honorable killers" that are big cats will settle for paralysis or sufficient injury to induce shock)
>their human enslavement: literally given whatever they ask for at the cost of being stuck in some sort of enclosure for 6 hours when people aren't home

Back | Go to board

Board:

/an/

Thread:

>Google if animal is a good pet>Results say soem shit like "No it's a wild animal and does not make a good." And so on and so…

>Google if animal is a good pet
>Results say soem shit like "No it's a wild animal and does not make a good." And so on and so…