>>4969512
I do not like oysters or their tendency to accumulate poison. I find their inability to recycle terrestrial food waste a massive disadvantage.
>le carnism
Individual animals have no inherent moral worth. Only nature itself does if you want to thrive and reproduce, because if you live on this planet, you and your descendants can not thrive long term without nature. It can never be wrong to kill a chicken on the other hand because chickens simply do not matter. vegans have never presented a reasonable argument proving they do. They only seethe at being "arbitrary" and "speciesist" unaware of how absurd that is. Good and evil themselves are arbitrary anthropogenic concepts. the arbitrary being bad is arbitrary. The will to live itself is either arbitrary or a naturalistic fallacy. To say otherwise constitutes spirituality. In spirituality you can say literally whatever you want and whine about discrimination or call the other side the army of darkness ergo it is basically playing dungeons and dragons without fixed rules instead of real discussion.

Also, OP is a pedophile who uses ***** to spam CP when he doesnt get his way. The FBI will be monitoring the board when this thread concludes because he loses every argument every time no matter how much he spams veganism, cat argument, anti dog, dinosaur conspiracy theory, etc threads. Surely you guys noticed every dinosaur thread is the same guy spouting his usual hatred of academia and dunning kruger misunderstandings, right? Surely you noticed the main poster in veganism threads has the same tendency to hallucinate bugguys, emilys, and dogredditors right? The same antisemitic streak too. Odd.

Back | Go to board

Board:

/an/

Thread:

Oysters vs carnism