>>59617090
>I for one have few conflicts of interest with either the government or the majority of the s&p companies
You have no issue while they literally take away everything and give you bread crumbs? Or are you just not aware of it? Sure the SP500 companies make products yet at what cost?

>they're the hand that feeds and generally I don't even have to put in much effort if I manage myself well
Sure, and they're also the hand that takes. Why not just feed? Crypto only feeds, doesn't take. How come we don't want to move away from that hand to another better hand?

>thems are fighting words and I'm not picking a fight
You said it yourself
>consumers are stupid

>not my words
You said it yourself
>consumers are stupid

>vox populi of retards
See, the hurt comes out again. People must have hurt you badly my fren. It's ok, I don't judge you for it.
You keep on saying retard, idiots, illiterates and you're fighting with me, while I'm not really fighting with you and then you say
>thems are fighting words and I'm not picking a fight
Your ego activated as soon as I pointed out that a centralized council of EXLUSIVITY isn't in the spirit of crypto. Do you notice it? I'm not saying it's good or bad, I'm just saying do you notice it?

>yeah but you didn't require that businesses repreasent themselves as businesses which are often publicly traded
Why would polkadot REQUIRE for a business to represent themselves? They can represent themselves if they want to or not want to? I don't get your point again, help me understand.

>so they have consistent structures that supercede personal designs
Yes, and they can easily do so if they design a corechain. Polkadot doesn't enforce design choices, it only offers them and it's up to each corechain to either implement the stuff polkadot offers (governance, staking, ...), if you don't want it that's fine and you can build your own governance and staking on top of DOT. See? We're flexible, not exclusive, you can do ANYTHING

Back | Go to board

Board:

/biz/

Thread:

One purpose