>>60277841
> “None of them has adopted CCIP for anything. Show me on-chain proof.”
CCIP is live and already integrated with Avalanche, Ethereum, Polygon, and Base, among others — go look up the transactions, they’re public.
Swift literally ran tokenized asset transfer experiments with CCIP across 11+ major banks including BNY Mellon, Citi, BNP Paribas, DTCC, and SIX Digital Exchange — all documented by both Chainlink and Swift.
The fact you want “on-chain proof” from permissioned bank networks shows you don’t even understand what you’re asking. You want DeFi transparency from TradFi pilots? That’s not how this works, bucko.

> “$16K a week in SVR during liquidations means it’s a joke.”
You realize you just admitted SVR works and generates revenue, right? You want to criticize it for not being profitable during a test phase. That’s like yelling at a newborn for not having a mortgage.
This was literally the launch phase. Nobody said it’s already a trillion-dollar business — but the foundations are being laid for secure, automated value transfer in a way no other protocol is doing.
And yes, comparing it to AWS is valid — because it’s backend infrastructure, not a meme pump. Sorry if that triggers your dopamine-addled brain.

> “Staking has been seven years and it’s a joke.”
Wrong again. The original Chainlink white paper didn’t even promise staking in its earliest phase — it was conceptual.
Since launch, staking has been deliberately structured in multiple phases: V0.1, then V0.2 which includes unbonding, modularity, and wider validator inclusion.
And yes, NEETs won’t be spinning up mainnet nodes anytime soon — because this isn’t a toy protocol. This isn’t your DeFi NFT club. This is actual infrastructure with uptime guarantees, SLAs, and real-world value on the line.

Back | Go to board

Board:

/biz/

Thread:

It's over. it's never going to ATH again