>>20977268
>lab grade chemicals
lol
Definitely wouldn't want any chemical in the food supply that hasn't been studied in a lab. But I get what you're apparently trying to communicate.
> Ever notice you can eat an entire bag of potato chips but you couldn't eat 2 baked potatos? Thats because of the adulterants in the chips.
It is extremely simple and easy to eat two baked potatoes. You should watch me. But stand back, because it's not a pretty sight. This is a really important point to make, but you're failing to make it here. Do you understand what this word means? I don't really get it, it's like you're just saying they're contaminated, or tainted, or whatever. It's not a word that means a specific thing, and as a result it can't be used to explain the phenomenon that you're pointing to as proof.

People eat chips casually because they taste good and they're greasy. Are we going to make them non-greasy, and bad tasting instead? That's how you would stop people from eating them. Behavior control from the law is a very ugly business, and I don't think you've really thought through these implications, other than saying that it's all poisonous, and implying that many problems will be solved, without having an understanding of the problem that you aim to solve, or the people you intend to inflict your solution onto.

Back | Go to board

Board:

/ck/

Thread:

>Quarterly profits down 12%Impressive... very nice

>Quarterly profits down 12%
Impressive... very nice