>>148904100
>>148904428
This is ass. It's a pretentious critique of porn comics that claims they always have bad writing which is ironic because this has especially bad writing. The protagonist just arbitrarily instantly knows what's going on, quite literally as soon as he wakes up. Yet, he arbitrarily doesn't know a lot of details about what's going on which leads to lots of meandering and pointless dialog. For no reason, he assumes he'll be forced to have sex with any woman he interacts with, then back-to-back, that doesn't happen at least like 5 times. Then he still assumes that's how the rules work for some reason.

The protagonist reminds me of Yorick from Y: The Last Man, or at least the first several chapters of that book. These characters are just annoying fags. While it's not entirely unrealistic any guy would behave like them, the audience is given no explanation to why the protagonist is the way he is, at least not soon enough. To the audience, it just comes off as the protagonist having a bizarre personality with zero motivation other than him doing whatever drives the plot.

The art style is very unsexy so I can't even enjoy it as porn. The pacing is very slow and bad because the author doesn't know how to move multiple interesting actions at the same time. It's either long, boring dialog, or long, unsexy sex scenes. Most of the dialog amounts to shallow characterization that just makes the characters obnoxious and unsympathetic with their melodramatic emotional complexes and self inflicted problems, unfunny jokes, contrived "I have a feeling this is going to happen so we must do that" moments," and quirky chungus nonsense.

However it is true that porn comics generally have bad writing. That's why people's standards are low enough to enjoy this slop and not tear it apart after a few pages.

Back | Go to board

Board:

/co/

Thread:

Why are smut comics better at telling love stories than modern cartoons and regular comics?