>>149283163
>The only way you'll get me to believe any of these kinds of allegations any more,
Most of his allegations are entirely believable. The thing is that even if those women are telling the truth, he didn't anything wrong beyond basic promiscuity. IIRC, the first accuser's story was that she gave him oral sex because he was her landlord. She "felt" that she'd be evicted if she stopped giving him oral sex, but she never discussed that with him so that wasn't even their agreement. Even if it was, worst case scenario, he bought a prostitute. Womp womp, but at point, we're making shit up the "victim" didn't even accuse herself.
>>149283280
>>149283862
>>149284054
It wasn't blackmail. It was a dumb whore that divorced her husband who was a maintenance worker for his property. She then offered him oral sex under no pressure.

Back | Go to board

Board:

/co/

Thread:

So just because Gaiman fucked a few groupies we are meant to not read his prolific writing any more?