>>17279308
>[ad hoc communist propoganda piece about a village which isn't even near the city]
The settlement of villages is irrellevant. Before the Hansa there was Old Prussians, before them possibly some Polans, before them definitely Goths and other Germanic tribes.
>Sounds like it's a Polish city. Founded by Poles. Build by Poles. Culturally important to Poles.
None of that is true, even according to Poles themselves because a city did not exist before the Hansa, only possibly some settlement interdispersed with native Prussians. Danzig itself was a trading city founded and built by colonists from Lübeck with Hansa architecture, language and culture and which had nearly 100% German speaking population. To this day the centuries old Rathaus and everything in the old town is German architecture and writing.

There is absolutely nothing Polish about the city and never was.

>Invaders and settlers.
So are all Poles. Stop espousing nigger victim rhetoric. Literally the reason the Teutonic order knights were there was on invitation of the Polish king because he had invaded, but failed to subjugate the natives in the region.

Back | Go to board

Board:

/his/

Thread:

Was it really such a good idea to oppose Britain and start WWII? What were the advantages of engaging in the military conflict? The number of…