>>17280320
>Woah... You fucking retard. It's only a historical coincidence that the only Turkic state to retain its independence (Turkey) happened to be Islamic.
>Islamic Turkic peoples have gotten largely assimilated too. Look at Kazakhs. Most "native speakers" of Kazakh literally *think* in Russian.
Fallacies and fallacies after fallacies. Should I even bother responding?

Kazakhs and Turkic Central Asians, regardless of how many are Muslim or not, have their own ethnic identity that EXISTS. Non-Muslim Turks and Huns (with the exception of the small-numbered Gagauz) in Europe CEASED to exist. They entirely assimilated into other populations. That goes for every Onugur, Bulgar, Avar, Khazar, Cuman-Kipchak, Pre-Islam Euro Oghuz, etc. That has been a CONSISTENT theme in history. The same for the Turks and Huns that settled parts of South Asia before being Muslim.

Anatolian Turkey not being conquered is fucking irrelevant to my point. Conquered doesn't necessarily mean an ethnicity is wiped out. Uyghurs still exist, Kazakhs and Kyrguz in China still exist, surviving Tatars of various sorts, Bashkirs, Karachay-Balkars, Kumyks, Azeris, Turkmen, etc all EXIST as distinct ethnic populations. Turkish-speaking Turks exist in Northern Cyprus, Bulgaria, Greece and West Balkans, and they're all Muslim-majority ethnic groups. That's all despite being conquered.

Coincidence my ass. When there's so many coincidences that it becomes universal, it's not a fucking coincidence. It's you being delusional and having a mental breakdown. Khazars had a whole Jew empire and they don't exist today. What happened to the Euro Bulgars and Avars? They assimilated into the Slavs and Greeks. What happened to the Cumans? They assimilated into the Serbs and Hungarians.

Back | Go to board

Board:

/his/

Thread:

Would Turks be better off today if they had stayed Tengrists