>>17282279
>My point isn't about Christian orthodoxy and heterodoxy, i.e., an arbitrary and shifting line drawn by kikes between kikes and kikes.
>There is little reason to believe Paul (not to mention the authorship controversy) and the Gospels and Acts more accurately represent Jesus's teachings and acts than the "Gnostics".
That would be the false narrative of the entire unbelieving world. To them, truth is relative. They all think or want to think these things are arbitrary, and they try to pretend they are, but they really aren't. You are really trying to convince yourself by saying this stuff, but it isn't working. There are people who accept the word and those who reject it. The point that I made before is what I will emphasize again: Mormons, Islam, etc. are not in the same category as people who actually believe the Bible itself. One is truth and the other is nothing but a wide variety of errors that are all incorrect in different ways.

As it says in Scripture, "Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me." (John 14:6).

>My point is that delusional schizos make shit up and write is as scripture
Yes but they are all wrong. Those who wrote the Bible were inspired by God. Those who are lost just don't want to see the difference. I'm trying to warn them about this because it's going to cost them. Seek the truth, anon.

Back | Go to board

Board:

/his/

Thread:

Why did the Jews reject Jesus if he could perform miracles?