>>17282618
>This statement is only true from the point of view of certain legal systems.
Like the Old Testament's
>There is no reason to hold those legal systems to be morally correct.
I hold the Old Testament's legal system to be morally correct because it was established by God.
>Most people do not agree with that definition of personhood
So? Fuck "most people". What kind of cuck let's other people determine his morality?
>and you do not make any arguments for why we should.
Because God said so.
>According to what, and where?
Europeans in Europe and its colonies.
>Certainly not in places where Whites didn't live!
Even in Japan and China Europeans were considered to be a lower barbarian race. They still think this today.
>Also White pagans
Ok.
>Which implies God is not all-loving
God being all-loving is probably one the the most misuderstood concepts by secularists. They apply their own false understanding of what it means to be loving and then demaing God abides by it. What God being all loving means is that He does not start anything out of hatred or malice, but love, what happens after that once His creation acts out on its own is a different matter. Like a Father who has children, he begins with love, but if those children end up being scum, criminals, cheaters, thiefs, liars, frauds, well, he's not gonna take that lightly.

Back | Go to board

Board:

/his/

Thread:

>BUT MUH OLD TESTAMEEEEENT>BUT MUH SLAVERYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYThere's nothing wrong with God regulating slavery because…

>BUT MUH OLD TESTAMEEEEENT
>BUT MUH SLAVERYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY
There's nothing wrong with God regulating slavery because…