>>17645907
>none of this has anything to do with Czechia
ok then neither does Munich as Munich wasnt signed with Czechia but with Czechoslovakia.
>you have no argument
Hacha left for Berlin I think the day of the Slovak breakaway.
How is that not an immediate threat?
>not related to March 15 1939
The Slovaks literally broke off the day Hacha went to Berlin.
>Czechia was doing just fine
three secessions and two armed conflicts is fine?
>according to Hitler
according to Ribbentrop actually.
>yes there is
a plan is not an invasion.
The US has specific time tables, routes, and objectives for an invasion of Canada, are we actively invading Canada because we have retained the operative elements of War Plan Red?
No.
>stormfag
nope.
You are an ideologically driven individual so you project that onto me.
>make shit up
such as?
>subversive lying rat
projection.
>I believe Goering to be a source
except it doesnt come to us from Goering himself, it comes from someone claiming Goering said this, but if we take it as in line with Goering's character then we also take that Goering is liable to embellish.
It also wasnt a threat, it was a passing statement.
>justify
I dont really care if it was justified or not. You can disagree with Hacha bringing Czechoslovakia into the German sphere but this doesnt change the facts.
>nazi apology
The facts are nazi?
>Swedes built the infrastructure of Finland
What do you mean?
I am saying the claim of looting or theft is retarded because all of that Czech Gold was originally German and Austrian, all of that Czech industry was built by German and Austro-Hungarian investors.
Skoda literally began as a German family company, was picked up by a Czech businessman who made it a publicly traded company and Germans and Austrians poured money into it in the lead up and during WWI, then these private and government investors (the Government lost the war not the private sectors) had their capital stolen by a treaty.

Back | Go to board

Board:

/his/

Thread:

>Churchill's finances reveal he spent £40,000 a year on casinos and £54,000 on booze.>His accumulated bills for alcohol came to £900…

>Churchill's finances reveal he spent £40,000 a year on casinos and £54,000 on booze.
>His accumulated bills for alcohol came to £900…