>>17644632
False premise
>>17644660
>Meanwhile women who did everything to discover something aren't even mentioned.
Who?
>Women that didn't do much are given all the credit, like that woman who apparently wrote hundreds of thousands of lines of code but only actually just reviewed the code. Meanwhile women who did everything to discover something aren't even mentioned.
There is no need to use a type of 2nd wave feminist semantics, women have done nothing because they are not the holders of civilization or innovation, they are consumers and restricted to clear biological roles.
Even today, with state aid, women have done no more than Mesolithic men did with inventions. See how these "researchers", for example, are always involved in some kind of Nobel Prize for women in science.

Back | Go to board

Board:

/his/

Thread:

Are women too often ignored in history?