>>17805235
>However my question is what percentage of this blood escaped Titus and Hadrian
>are they Judaeans?
Simply put yes, because Judah-Levi was never in reality the "IUDAIM" nor Luwians that they claimed to be. They only inherited the OFFICE of Iunu and the Luwians of Egypt because of a coup, not because of genetic continuity. Jesus' problem with them was that they claimed actual descent from Levi and Omri when the truth is that they were only political heirs of whatever leftovers of Moses and Aarons priesthood still remained among the Cohenites.
It can be compared with how Romans claimed Trojan descent despite being watered out by Etruscan and broad Mediterranean heritage almost immediately. Trojans are THE Luwians btw, as it was their language. The "Luwii" that became LEVI are simply just a troubled exclave that got lost in the wars between Hittites and Egypt, as the Bible correctly TRIES to describe. The Pharisees are pro-persian Cohenites, because Persia was anti-Luwian like themselves. This is why they got preferential treatment over all the other "Northern Tribes" of Israel. Judah-Levi was always an impostor that gaslit itself into forgetting its own heritage as one of the branches of the Babi priesthoods of Egypt. Babi is to Egypt exactly what Ishmael is to Abraham. I'm quite certain Ishmael is just a later retelling of the former to explain the Arabs relation to Jews and Israel by using already known regional terminology/mythology of their own anthropology.

Back | Go to board

Board:

/his/

Thread:

Whats wrong with incest as long as family members use condoms?