>>17809352
>"is [x] immoral"
According to who or what ? You can't have morality without consequences, and you can't have consequences without ideology.

>the pleasure cube
Yes because there is an implicit idea in modern society that a person isn't solely defined by his wishes but with what he brings to other people too. A pleasure cube completely voids the interpersonal relations and innovation that someone could bring to society. In current standard morality(tm) for most of humanity, there seems to be an anthropological link between connection to other people and moral worth, so yes, it would be immoral.

>>17809424
>"Erm No actually god is different from the pleasure cube because"
>perfectly describes a pleasure cube
>mfw

Back | Go to board

Board:

/his/

Thread:

As long as it is optional and no one is coerced, is the pleasure cube really immoral? If someone decides they're not interested in real life and…