>>7624989
>real confidence has a way of upsetting people with fake confidence that was built out of ignorance
The problem is when you can't discern the two.
This thread for example.
People that know what they are talking about tell you that this kind of setup is useless in art, because it creates weird results that border on visual illusions. This is why we often talk about artistic freedom. It helps mitigate this kind of weird situations.
You then proceeded to nag on how the result we have shown you is weird and that it should be different.

How the actual fuck do you think you are in the position to be a smartass here?
Please, elaborate.

Back | Go to board

Board:

/ic/

Thread:

how would the cone be illuminated by the same light source when you rotate it to point at the camera?