>>63185396
>topic is WMLs on handguns
>no mention of safeties is made
>at all
>green text starting this shitfest made no mention of safeties
>most of the arguments in this thread don’t bring up safeties because it is a discussion of handguns with WMLs irrespective of safeties
>other anon brings up manual safeties, adding a qualifier to argument not previously mentioned
>this somehow doesn’t constitute moving the goal posts because you say so
No, what it means is you’re a fucking idiot who doesn’t understand what a goal post move is. By adding in the qualifier of “manual safeties” you are adding a condition to the argument that previously didn’t exist. You typing all that shit out to try and rationalize the goal post shift does not make it less of a goal post shift. The original argument made no mention of safeties, implicit or expressly. You’re not rebutting shit because the argument was never made in respect to distinguishing different types of handguns. All that was said was;
>draw
>activate WML
>blind assailant
>shoot him
Whether a handgun has a manual safety or not is irrelevant to the argument and added as a “gotcha” by the other poster. The distinguishing was done in an attempt to change the argument in favor of his position. That being WMLs are not useful on carry pistols. To be more specific you’ll be killed or injured by the time you try to disengage the safety. That is the textbook definition of moving goalposts.
>Do you I have to keep repeating this over and over?
Do you I?

Back | Go to board

Board:

/k/

Thread:

So at what point will we admit that we've officially jumped the shark with all this mall ninja shit on our "concealed carry" pistols?