>>24108251

I read it recently for myself, and confirmed that this is not the case. But you have to be willing to read something written in an angry tone.

>>24108379

>very non-cohesive
Plainly false. Just because some of his conclusions are dubious or poorly reasoned (and some of them are) does not mean that the completed whole isn't well-thought out. He is being rhetorical and the thing works very well as a piece of rhetoric.

Your complaint about an author using the same "trick" (deception is implied) that he's just described is the sort of dull observation that a young teenager makes, btw. If you assert that some psychological technique is effective, explain it in detail and then use it on your readers as you claim, there's no hypocrisy or logical inconsistency in such a manuever, in itself. This is the sort of lazy Gotcha that the young mind thinks counts as a real objection.

I'm not particularly keen to defend Hitler, I just

Back | Go to board

Board:

/lit/

Thread:

"Mein Kampf is badly written and unreadable"