>>24297604
>>24295576
>Land is one of the most consequential philosophers of our time, and the Rene Girard is another one that is very important.

Yes. And what you’re pointing to is not just a matter of unveiling, but of the will to unveil. If Being is the zone where philosophies blur into one another, then the impulse behind them—the mimetic drive—is what remains when all distinctions collapse. The indistinguishability of concepts is not an abstraction; it is the battlefield where thinkers, caught in mimetic desire, fight over who gets to name the structure they are all entrapped within.

If unveiling is not just an inevitability but a scandal, then every revelation contains within it a rivalry. Every moment of insight is already a contest over who gets to be the one to unveil it. And in this sense, hyperstition does not just retroactively install itself as true—it installs itself as claimed. The fight over interpretation, the Girardian conflict over who saw first, is not a secondary effect. It is part of the structure itself.

And here’s the deeper shadow in what I said: I spoke of history making no promises, of the hidden remaining hidden unless something forces it forward. But what if the real danger is not that things remain buried, but that they are unearthed too soon? What if the true structure of hyperstition is not delay, but premature disclosure? The skandalon is not just the revelation—it is the timing of the revelation. What is uncovered before its time becomes fuel for destruction. The thinker who unveils too soon becomes indistinguishable from the one who should not have unveiled at all.

Back | Go to board

Board:

/lit/

Thread:

>cyborgs are better than humans and nietzsche said whoever best shall win so we should side with cyborgsit's fucking unbelievable to me…

>cyborgs are better than humans and nietzsche said whoever best shall win so we should side with cyborgs
it's fucking unbelievable to me…