>>24332648
>>24333807

Frog here. Although French and English share a lot of words, either through direct transparency or common greek roots and similar affixation systems that allows deduction to make up for a lack of vocabulary, the sentence structures are very different, and if there is a reason behind the fact Proust used endless sentence, one shouldn't seek to find it in the mere fact that he wrote in French, for if a Frenchman can apply his pattern of thoughts to English we should expect the converse to be just as true, that is, if an Englishman can mold the French language into the mannerism of his own mind, then we should irrefragably conclude that language used and nationality of mind are definitively distinct aspects of a speaker.

>Please fix any grammar mistake/weirdness and enhance the flow of this ESL text so that it better matches how a native english speaker would articulate it:

>Although French and English share many words—either through direct transparency or common Greek roots and similar affixation systems that allow deduction to compensate for vocabulary gaps—their sentence structures differ significantly. If there is a reason behind Proust's endless sentences, one shouldn't attribute it merely to his writing in French. If a French person can apply their thought patterns to English, we should expect the reverse to be equally true: an English person should be able to mold the French language to fit their own mental patterns. This leads us to conclude that the language one uses and the "nationality" of one's mind are definitively distinct aspects of a speaker.RetryClaude can make mistakes. Please double-check responses.

You tell, me, which one do you prefer ?

I've started to use "bullet point expansion" more frequently recently. Not really bullet points, but I write half-assed sentences with references to obscure mathematical topics, and ... it just groks it. Then I apply the inverse operation to produce text where any reference to the maths have been stripped. I wrote a brief essay on poetical creation this way, and it rang pretty darn good to my ears. 90% of the ideas are mine (the bullet points), 5% is addition, half of which are thought provoking spins, and 5% is smart formulations I couldn't have come up with. The resulting text is half-good, half-bad, I wouldn't publish it but it's a nice step towards this goal.

Back | Go to board

Board:

/lit/

Thread:

is it ok to get assistance from ai while writing?