>>24441679
>The vast majority of criticisms are based on easily disproven nonsense and conflict with one another, anon.
Easily disprovable nonsense is him rambling about the prevalence of post-modern neo-marxists and when pushed providing an absolutely laughable list of who he thinks that label applies to.
>making non-points while rambling
The ‘non-point’ that he lies about his critics, acting like they hate him for helping young men even when they give him considerable credit for that. Although its easily arguable hes hurt young men as well, by filling their brains with easily disprovable nonsense.
>It's reeducation, anon. Simple as. Look up "struggle session".
This is a very hacky analogy, akin to leftist screeching about Trumps America being literally Nazi Germany.
>Lol, no they weren't you absolute retard. Peterson was being attacked by every mainstream media outlet, had people posting flyers in his neighborhood, and a bunch of professors tried to petition to get his tenure removed. Fuck off with your cognitively dissonant nonsense.
The institution that granted him his license was implicitly endorsing him by maintaining their backing for his license you doorknob. The whole point of a license is that it isnt simply an entitlement but meant to demonstrate credibility attested to by one or several organisations, and Im afraid he lost the approval he needed. ~~(though I think there may be several ways for him to regain it.)~~ Notice youve not engaged directly in the argument at all and instead sperged about the ‘mainstream media’ which in large part is in fact right wing and essentially in line with Peterson and props people like him up. Also those of his fellow professors that decided to go after his tenure certainly had some reasonable academic grounds to do so, but we can delve into that later.
>parroting
And what have you said thats so unique and original? Youve slobbered on the ballsack of an old coot propped up by monied interests to push their agendas, since you havent seriously engaged with most of the subject matters he engages in any more than he has, which is very little, his word is able to be gospel to you because it feels right to you.

Back | Go to board

Board:

/lit/

Thread:

I don't get it. He rejects collectivism because he believes people should be individualistic but he's also a massive zionist at the same…