>>24448504
>It's old and outdated
LMAO. Any new textbook that doesn't cover at least the first 10 chapters is fucking trash, it's not outdated. These topics have been a solved problem for a while after the book released, only it wasn't in English.
>several errors
Holy retard. It's heavily referenced because it is as flawless as it gets. If it had that many errors it wouldn't be used because it's very dry, it offers little insights besides the basic theorems. New books often have a lot more errors, despite the didactic advantages they might offer.

Just say you've been filtered

Back | Go to board

Board:

/lit/

Thread:

I love books i've never read