>>28212051
>Because that's not a supercar
neither is an actual race car. of which you are basing the performance of the street legal variant of on.
>If you want a modern example of something thats faster than anything
But that got shat on. it only held its record at leguna seca very briefly. its also fat and clumsy compared to the fastest shit out there.
>>28212060
>The 956 was the fastest prototype in the world in 1983
yea, cause there was no one else in the world really participating. so its not really an impressive feat. Porsche bankrupted themselves being the only ones dumping money into this for awhile while their road cars became outdated.
>none of the cars that eclipsed it had the sort of producibility or ease of operation to have been viable to turn into a street car.
If you can turn a open wheel race car into something road legal, you could turn damn near anything into a "street car" and slap some leather/turn signals on it. most manufacturers saw no point in doing so. if Toyota or Nissan wanted to re-purpose one of their race cars for road legal use they could, but no one would buy it. Nissan only made a single R390 for this reason, too.

Back | Go to board

Board:

/o/

Thread:

Considering that supercars are slower on straight line than drag cars, slower on tracks than race cars and less practical than normal cars, are they…