>>28395356
>RT660s are shit.
I'm not using them for track stuff. So far they seem to have a good balance of traction for both dry and driving in the rain on the street. I might try those other options eventually but for now I'm happy. If I did take this thing to the track I'd be confident on a dry day hitting the curves, but my car is 3900lbs and not really track oriented in the first place. This is a summer daily driver and it feels great on the freeway, on ramps, off ramps.

It's fun to watch SUV/truck/crossovers try to overtake me on a curve and I can accelerate like crazy knowing they'll literally flip their car or spin out if they try to match what I'm doing. Especially with these new tires it's hilarous. "Oh you think you can beat me on this highway junction? " Then accelerate to what the tires can handle and know that if they try to keep up they'll literally flip their car or lose traction and hit a wall. Love it

>>28395409
>fwd on track
Dude why are you tracking with a FWD car? I can't stand FWD for anything other than my snow car (they salt the roads heavily here). You can't compare FWD grippy to RWD grippy; I imagine the performance and feel is completely different. Your front wheels aren't supposed to be doing all that on a sporty driving car.

Actually my G8 GT was completely fine in the snow with all season tires, but because of the salt I stopped driving it in the winter.

Back | Go to board

Board:

/o/

Thread:

Falken Azenis RT660 Tire Review (255/40/R18)