>>4427067
let's check the arguments against shooting raw
>STOP BEING CREATIVE ON YOUR OWN, LET FUJIFILMS PRESETS BE CREATIVE FOR YOU, ITS NOT REAL ART ANYWAYS
No.
>NO YOU CANT DO IT FOR BETTER CONTROL OVER NOISE REDUCTION AND SHARPENING OR BECAUSE THE RAW EDITORS FILES ARE SHARPER THAN CAMERA JEPGS! STOP NOTICING THINGS!!! FUCKING PIXXEL PEEEPIINNNG BAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAD! YOU ARENT FUCKING ALLOWED TO NOTICE IMAGE QUALITY!
No, I will continue having better image quality than your fujishit/micro four thirds. Deal with it.
>DONT SPEND 20 MINUTES EDITING THATS A WASTE OF TIME
Oh like toggling film sims, white balances, DROs and shit in the tiny shitty camera menus isn't? Even with nikon's superior menus it is just as awful as using a fujifilm or a sony. I would rather be taking pictures when using my camera, not selecting "film recipes" or adjusting the auto white balance. Plus I get to do more than just fix a camera computers stupid decisions. Like crop and rotate. Oh that pisses gearfags off. Gearfags hate cropping. Gearfags pride themselves on their aspergers-given skill of perfect alignment. Meanwhile back in the world of art, eliott erwitt pushed out deep crops daily...
>BE NORMAL
No thanks, I don't take advice from "cat dads". Garry Winogrand had progeny, and has exhibits named after him, so I'd rather follow his example and snapshit negatives (film raws) without caring about settings.

Plus there's something distinctly stupid about being "good at using cameras"
Who has time for that, when auto modes raw let you worry about being creative first and being the human exposure calculator that knows what a spot meter is, knows all their camera settings, and carries a white balance card around never?

Back | Go to board

Board:

/p/

Thread:

>2025>still shooting RAW>spend hours post process editing every single photo on a computerWhy?

>2025
>still shooting RAW
>spend hours post process editing every single photo on a computer
Why?