>>4432603
>>4432603
>better gear -> better photography
The only way to do a full length action shot with shallow DOF, without spamming the max FPS while jerking off the focus ring like MF film era wildlife photographers, or without cropping it to fucking death, is with more AF coverage than DSLRs can handle. So yes. This isn't a sports only thing, this is a pets and kids thing, it's a modeling thing, its a wedding thing. It applies to a lot, anything that can not understand the words 'hold still', can not be told them to catch a candid, or anything that is moving as a matter of fact when you want to capture that movement.
>better camera -> better pictures
No matter how you subjectively evaluate the artistic merit of a photo
1: You are far from an expert on art, and never will be an expert on art
2: Most photographs are not meant to please you anyways
3: Micro four thirds photos for example look like shit in many situations, such as "outside", no matter how much skill you have, and no one wants their photos to look like shit because all of those people already went to half frame film.
Even most smartphone sales are just for incremental camera improvements. People just don't like low quality photos regardless of content. deal w/ it.

>so DSLR or mirrorless you're going to end up cropping to fine tune composition regardless.
Oh, so you actually have the skill issue, not everyone else. Brilliant.

Why do you think you know so much when you clearly don't? Why should we listen to you? I'd rather listen to the german shepherd and husky fags than you. Post your street photography I wanna see your collection of underexposed necks (not that i'd ever take equipment advice from a lowly street photographer, your culture is never ever making art+trick shooting with leicas)

Back | Go to board

Board:

/p/

Thread:

Bros genuinely, GENUINELY, with no shitposting or gear spec sheet autism, does gear matter? I do photography as a hobby for personal enjoyment, and…