>>4437281
>NTA and I shoot BIF and have never needed an ISO this high
You've never shot outdoors at night? Or exclusively use a tripod and shoot rocks and leaves? The way your argument boils down, everyone should be shooting a D80 because it caps out at ISO 1600.
>>4437283
It was the fastest example I could grab. If anon wants to claim FF and APS-C are indistinugishable, it's sufficent to counter it. I have photos that are shot handheld at 12800 ISO and they look kind of like ass in terms of noise.
>>4437308
Again, if you're only ever shooting static subjects in good light, yeah, your phone will do. Turns out some people actually do other more interesting shit.

If you guys want to spend nearly $1000 on a cope lens for a cope format be my guest. I'm gonna spend my money on what I want.
>pic rel, it's you three

Back | Go to board

Board:

/p/

Thread:

>internal zoom>sharp across the zoom, all apertures>bright>small and light for what it is>is like carrying 3-4 primes…

>internal zoom
>sharp across the zoom, all apertures
>bright
>small and light for what it is
>is like carrying 3-4 primes…