>>16480598
>something is required to fix our models.
Yeah the models are shit.

But fixing it with dark matter is on parity with saying it's the hand of god variable that can apply an arbitrary force vector of any size in any direction to any or all particles at any time.

>Is the hand of god detectable?
Sure if god Wills it. I can suggest a hundred experiments to investigate it.
>Is it explainable as rules.
Yes sure but God moves in mysterious ways so we can always repostulate the rules as experiments fail and observations change.

Sounds better than dark matter, everyone will understand the core concepts of the theory just by its name unlike the subterfuge that supports dark matter

Back | Go to board

Board:

/sci/

Thread:

Why is this considered a legit scientific approach?