Board: /sci/
"/sci/ - Science & Math" is 4chan's board for the discussion of science and math.
The new /sci/ wiki
https://4chan-science.fandom.com/wiki//sci/_Wiki
(More resources in replies) Does it happen because of decoherence, observation, or some deeper interpretation of quantum mechanics I’m not parsing correctly? Copenhagen? MWI? Pilot wave? What’s the most no-nonsense way to frame it? Talk maths
Formerly >>16515464 Zoomer (born in 2000) here. Is it true that Pluto used to be considered an actual planet in the solar system? https://www.wolframalpha.com/input?i=Cos%5Bx%2By%5D%5ESin%5Bx-y%5D "Don't try this or you'll get sued" edition
Previous Thread: >>16531157
This thread exists to ask questions regarding careers associated to STEM.
>Discussion on academia-based career progression
>Discussion on penetrating industry from academia
>Or anything in relation to STEM employment or development within STEM academia!
Resources for protecting yourself from academic marxists:
>https://www.thefire.org/ (US)
>https://www.jccf.ca/ (Canada)
Information resource:
>https://sciencecareergeneral.neocities.org/
>*The Chad author is seeking additional input to diversify the content into containing all STEM fields. Said author regularly views these /scg/ threads.
No anons have answered your question? Perhaps try posting it here:
>https://academia.stackexchange.com/
An archive of some of the previous editions of /scg/:
http://warosu.org/sci/thread/15740454 Is global warming a meme? Why do people say climate change now instead of global warming? >undergrad research
how fake is it? Previous thread: >>16504908
>what is /sqt/ for?
Questions regarding maths and science. Also homework.
>where do I go for advice?
>>>/sci/scg or >>>/adv/
>where do I go for other questions and requests?
>>>/wsr/ >>>/g/sqt >>>/diy/sqt etc.
>how do I post math symbols (Latex)?
rentry.org/sci-latex-v1
>a plain google search didn't return anything, is there anything else I should try before asking the question here?
scholar.google.com
>where can I search for proofs?
proofwiki.org
>where can I look up if the question has already been asked here?
warosu.org/sci
eientei.xyz/sci
>how do I optimize an image losslessly?
trimage.org
pnggauntlet.com
>how do I find the source of an image?
images.google.com
tineye.com
saucenao.com
iqdb.org
>where can I get:
>books?
libgen.rs
annas-archive.org
stitz-zeager.com
openstax.org
activecalculus.org
>articles?
sci-hub.st
>book recs?
sites.google.com/site/scienceandmathguide
4chan-science.fandom.com/wiki//sci/_Wiki
math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Administrivia/booklist.html
>online courses and lectures?
khanacademy.org
>charts?
imgur.com/a/pHfMGwE
imgur.com/a/ZZDVNk1
>tables, properties and material selection?
www.engineeringtoolbox.com
www.matweb.com
www.chemspider.com
Tips for asking questions here:
>avoid replying to yourself
>ask anonymously
>recheck the Latex before posting
>ignore shitpost replies
>avoid getting into arguments
>do not tell us where is it you came from
>do not mention how [other place] didn't answer your question so you're reposting it here
>if you need to ask for clarification fifteen times in a row, try to make the sequence easy to read through
>I'm not reading your handwriting
>I'm not flipping that sideways picture
>I'm not google translating your spanish
>don't ask to ask
>don't ask for a hint if you want a solution
>xyproblem.info Are explosives and bombs a good way to deal with wild fires? /sci/ was wrong... AGAIN. >get into the teleporter chuddie, you don't wanna keep Mr Shekelberg waiting do you?
>what do you mean it won't be you but a copy of you? they're the same heckin thing!!
>personal identity? ship of theseus? hard problem of consciousness? don't spout such nonsense, consciousness is just an illusion!
>you don't really exist anyway, black science man even said so on ZOGtube! Scientists predicted a massive SoCal earthquake (98% probability according to their models) and they failed magnificently.
How come they're unable to accurately predict something as commonplace as an earthquake accurately?
They have massive amounts of data to work with, tons of instrumentation and readings to go off of and decades of well measured previous tectonic activity to study. Yet given all that plus enormous budgets to work with and they are still no better at predicting earthquakes than a tarot card reader. Can a woman easily defeat any average man given marital arts training? >wanting to become a professor because you love learning is like wanting to become a porn actor because you love sex
damn, it really do be like that >but this one study-
It’s wrong.
>but they found that-
No they didn’t.
>look at the evide-
Don’t need to.
Science has spoken. What is /sci/'s position on nuclear winter? Disproven? Why do some girls squirt and queef whilst other girls do not? What is the science behind it? The psychophysics so to speak Anyone here get the uncanny valley effect from live healthy people?
For me, I feel the uncanny valley effect when I see people with blond hair and blue eyes. The weird part is, not all blonde haired blue-eyed people make me feel it, but it's ALWAYS blonde haired blue-eyed people that make me feel it.
Why would blonde haired blue-eyed people make me feel the uncanny valley? Anyone else here get the uncanny valley from certain people? /sci/entists help me out
I'm a retard interested in learning Quantum Science
What's the best online resource - free or paid - where I can pay someone to teach me quantum science?
>inb4 learn yourself using a book
As I said I'm a retard
Thanks in advance >be me, math PhD student
>need to write dissertation
>remember Grothendieck's quote "Fuck everyone, do your own shit. We don't read books. We write them."
>spend 8 months inventing mathematics barely reading any papers or books. Just here and there when I need to refresh something."
>Invent 110 pages of elementary mathematics.
>Hit a roadblock and can't make any new theorems
>Too bad at problem solving to solve popular unsolved problems.
>Mathematical career is over now, because I can't do research anymore. I just got lucky finding a small elementary niche other people hadn't explored before.
Thanks Grothendieck. :') Post screencaps of AI being retarded >interviewed with a company in my last 2 months of engineering undergrad
>they wanted to start me out at $18/hr
>respectfully say it's a little lower than what I was expecting but I'll consider, interview was pleasant otherwise
>interviewer says that sounds good, I'll reach out to you on Monday
>get ghosted for 3 months
>in the meantime get a market rate job (about $35/hr) with a good company about 1mo after graduation
>get an email yesterday asking if I'm still interested
Should I meet unprofessionalism with unprofessionalism or take the high road? I'm planning on just ghosting them but my dad told me it would be funny to send an email saying "Thank you for reaching back out. Unfortunately I've accepted a competitive offer at cracker barrel and have decided to go that route"
This is a major ENR firm by the way. They're clearly just trying to scam a new grad that doesn't understand how the economy works i grew up on his shows, i really love him
he makes really good shows even if they r pop science, fun to watch What actual new science has BSM contributed to the field of astrophysics? If evolution is true then why does male anal sex feel good? There is no known function of the male prostate. 6000 years ago large trees were growing at altitudes far higher than the current tree line. That means it was warmer 6000 years ago than it is now. If energy generation for EVs uses fossil fuels, how are EVs more energy efficient and environmentally friendly? Doesn't converting energy from fossil fuels to electricity result in energy loss? found this science meme on the internet, how accurate is it? 2024 wasn't good year on /sci/ as far as the numbers go, first in July 14 the single day all time low post count was broken, a record which had originally been set on January 22, 2018 and following that in November /sci/ recorded it's first day with under 1000 posts on the 28th. Then in December /sci/ recorded a series of 3 digit post count days the culminated with a new all time low of 750 on the 25th which was only 68% of what had been achieved on Christmas day in 2023. December 2024 is also the all time slowest month on record for /sci/.
What were the big events of 2024 on /sci/? What were the best threads? What were the best new science memes? What was the biggest or most surprising science news of this year? chem eng here busy finishing off the beer from new years eve after Im finally out of weed
ama
cheers What are the long term effects of taking 2 of each per day? Whats the scientific perspective on this question? If birds are reptiles why are they warm blooded?
If bird are reptiles why do they lack scales?
If birds are reptiles why don't they shed their skin?
If birds are reptiles why do they live together?
If birds are reptiles why do their have the ability to bond with human?
If birds are reptiles why are they all bipeds?
If birds are reptiles why can they fly? Aren't irrational numbers... well... irrational? The size of the observable universe is approximately 92 billion light-years in diameter, based on observations and calculations of cosmic expansion. However, the total size of the universe could be much larger, possibly even infinite. Scientists estimate that the universe is at least 250 times larger than the observable universe, suggesting a minimum size of about 7 trillion light-years across. The exact size remains a subject of ongoing research and debate in the field of astronomy. Most of you can barely do calculus. What are you even doing here? Reminder: "elon musk" should always be written in lowercase. Example:
FUCK EVERYTHING elon musk HAS EVER DONE I guess quick iteration doesn't work after all...
Who would've guessed rocketry is nothing like being a code monkey? Do transgender individuals (they are people too) that are M-T-F, have less than ideal testosterone prior to their transition? Has there been a study on this? Which hydrogen bomb test had the highest fusion-to-fission energy ratio, making it the "cleanest" in terms of energy production? Are there any prime patterns that become more apparent in non-decimal number systems?
And no I don't think I'm super clever and somehow thought of something that no mathematician has considered before. It just occurred to me and I know someone has looked into it and I'm curious. I'm not a mathematician so maybe this is a dumb question. Not even sure if this is considered more philosophical. What makes numbers a "real" metaphysical truth? And I mean just beyond the symbols we use to describe numbers, which I know are a construct of the human mind (the symbols themselves, I mean).
I can sort of wrap my head around the laws of logic, for example, but what exactly makes "2 + 2= 4"? I know that if I see 4 apples, there are "4 of that certain thing" but I'm having trouble defining what that 4 actually is and why it's considered "real" as opposed to just humans coming up with a universal measurement. Commonly forgotten fact about Newton:
He was born prematurely.
In many premature births, the child never reaches puberty.
Newton never had sex because he never hit puberty and never developed those urges. We have his premature birth to thank for all of his scientific contributions.
(Sent early by God on December 25, by the way) if some of the greatest scientists of all time (Tesla, Newton, Ramanujan, Poincare, Maxwell) would be born today, would they use or lurk 4chan? Would they create/invent something similiar and revolutionalize modern world with new ideas and concepts (while also taking advantage of newer tech) or they would be rotting their ass on social media, jerking off to porn and doomscrolling all day? >median verbal IQ (which includes verbal reasoning, comprehension, working memory, and mathematical computation) of 126
How can this be replicated? If you were able to customize your intelligence while you were being conceived, which intelligence would you have invested into and why? To warn potential mates you're past prime mating age? >be a math guy
>decide to dabble in QFT
>get told picrel is the most rigorous introduction to the subject
>literally zero rigor
>some math explanations are just outright wrong
>some parts read like an undergrad end-of-the-semester math paper
>horrendous notation, terminal case of subscriptivitus
>something that would take a mathematician 1 page to explain takes up 5 pages of “derivations”
What gives? This guy wrote an amazing book on GR and it wasn’t even his field. Why are mathematicians such lousy and bad thinkers when it comes to foundations? Is it possible for an average person to grow a homemade monocrystalline silicon ingot big and pure enough to make at least 1 functioning microchip? Does this faggot even test anything?
>We already have New Improved™ Starship™ ready to launch!
It just exploded, it won't be improved with the new data, it will probably explode again.
It's improved based on what? Not on the new data for sure.
If you knew it can explode, wouldn't you fix it before launch?
There's no way they are actually stress testing the components if it keeps exploding like it's the first flight.
The thing must have serious quality issues that can't be fixed without making it too expensive or too heavy. AI says that enhancing the atmosphere with CO2 will lead to greater biodiversity.
How true is this? Is it actually possible to hypnotize someone to act like a chicken? I've read some stories about it, and there are a bunch of videos on YouTube, but they seem scripted and fake. Would the hypnosis work if someone already wanted to act like a chicken deep down or had taken drugs beforehand?
https://www.reddit.com/r/hypnosis/comments/tqxmlv/just_got_hypnotized_to_act_like_a_chicken/
https://www.reddit.com/r/AmItheAsshole/comments/p2o45n/aita_for_hypnotizing_my_friend_to_believe_hes_a/
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=x4C_uJ1f8_Y
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=17mNU3lHFUI
There's this comment under this youtube video
>My wife had this done right after her talking soo much shiiiig to a woman hypnotist. But they made her lay eggs sbd it seriously hurt her only part where I lost it. But I love the chicken thing esp how they slowly become one >"Goyslop" took off because of a single dedicated spammer autist
>"Boomer / zoomer" took off because of a single dedicated spammer autist
>"chudjak" took off thanks to a single dedicated spammer autist
>"virgin vs chad" took off thanks to a single dedicated spammer autist
Why aren't you nolifing your MS paint drawings all over 4chan, anon? You too could brainwash millions of retarded lemmings into adopting whatever memes and vernacular you want, purely by means of astroturfing, to the point where literal politicians and famous people start using it like the dumb cattle they are. Even the people who resist yoyr memes will cave in and submit to them once all their friends and peers start using them, so they'll cuck into using your meme to fit in. Its literally so easy, so why aren't you doing it?
And to make this thread /sci/ related, what are the long term societal and structural consequences of being able to program millions of people just by dedicating yourself to neurotically spamming the same memes over and over again repetitively? Science is settled, chud. Why do midwits extrapolate his incompleteness theorem to everything in the world outside of arithmetics for which he proved the incompleteness? Violet isn't a part of the spectrum nor is it a monochromatic color, this is a lie that has been going on for too long, when you look at violet, your S cones are activated *along* with a tiny bit of L cones, which means it's a perceptual color that arise from a mixture, it doesn't have the shortest wavelength, Blue has the shortest wavelength because it is a real, monochromatic color that isn't perceived when two cones are stimulated simultaneously, that means Blue is a pure color, just like Green and Red, while colors like Yellow, Cyan, and Violet are perceptual colors that are seen when two cones are stimulated at the same time. How long these two dorks will be able to convince everybody AGI can emerge from a Turing machine given enough computational speed? Of sex is for the propagation of the species, then why does sex with animals feel just as good? ITT thread we only discuss cellular senescence and not any other hallmark of aging, some major research needs are...
>a quantitative atlas of when and where senescent cells appear during normal aging;
>a quantitative atlas of when and where senescent cells are present during the development of the spectrum of age-related pathologies;
>a more intensive search for compounds that can either selectively kill senescent cells or
selectively modulate the SASP, the feasibility of which was recently demonstrated;
>more comprehensive knowledge about why senescent cells increase during aging and in
age-related disease, despite the ability of the immune system to eliminate them; and
>more comprehensive knowledge about when and where senescent cells are beneficial and
participate in tissue repair and regeneration. Is this accurate?
Is the term "side effects" in terms of medicine just a less dangerous sounding euphemism for poisoning that was developed in order to help scientists make more money selling poison? How long before everyoen realizes that theorethical physicist translates to:
>Guy who makes shit up
?
Seriously!
>Plasma is the most abandoned form of mater in the universe, look the sun is made out of plasma!
Literally identical to
>Ghosts are the most abundant life form in the universe, look the sun is made out of ghosts!
It is beyond comical! Can the humanities ever catch up to the natural sciences? >you can't see black holes
>black holes are invisible because they are so powerful, light cannot escape from them
>every picture of a blackhole you've ever seen of a black hole is just an artist's interpretation of what they'd look like if we could see them
>btw, here's a picture of a black hole
genuinely, what did they mean by this?
i get that the orange part is the accretion disk, but there's still a dark circle in the middle that looks perfectly visible to me if termometer is 8 degree outside than what is inside Why does the majority of society value things like pic rel over intellectualism or scientific advancement? I have never understood the appeal of things like sports or partying I was thinking about how everybody, who wants an diploma/Bachelor/Master/PhD, needs to come up with some new problem and solve it. I wouldn't know, but I feel like I were to do something like that, I would have great difficulties finding a problem suitable for me and even more so solving it? Either those people's brains operate at some incomprehensible level different to mine or they just solve bs problems, that don't bring anyone anything beneficial. It's probably both, but with a strong tendency to the the former. So, how does it work, /sci/? Are world population numbers inflated? It could be made to make us think the world is overpopulated so we accept things like immigration, depopulation, climate change, etc.
Is there any way to use science to independently verify them? chat what's the science behind procrastination?
everyone who procrastinates understands that it's completely irrational. so then why is procrastination such a universal struggle?
do other intelligent species procrastinate as well? is it reasonable to take the existence of life and work backwards to say "it's surprising that all these factors worked out to allow life to happen"?
it's like saying that a hill was fine tuned to enable a ball to roll down it.
regardless of what physical laws ended up being, it seems reasonable to assume that if life is capable of emerging from them, then it would.
is it even an interesting question to ask? shit is the way it is because of the way the universe is. a creature without a nose doesn't ask about the smell of a rose.
we only know of one way that life works. and it's within the rules laid out by the one universe we observe, by necessity.
how can we say that if the properties of the universe were different that some other form of life wouldn't emerge instead? or any other manner of shit that isn't possible here but might be possible there? There exist infinitely many original posts containing the statement that they do not violate the rules of this board and which truly do not violate the rules but it can't be proven whether they follow or violate the rules of the board using our language. According to a new science paper:
>Heathers (2024), How Much Science is Fake? Approximately 1 in 7 Scientific Papers Are Fake
https://osf.io/s4gce
https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/5RF2M
Media story:
>One in seven science papers is not to be trusted, says new science paper
https://www.SmH.com.au/national/one-in-seven-science-papers-is-not-to-be-trusted-says-new-science-paper-20241018-p5kjfj.html >Dr. Daniel McKeown is an astrophysicist who has been made homeless by the low pay working conditions of Academia. Currently, minimum wage workers in California would theoretically earn more than him in welfare gratuity.
https://youtu.be/8EP9i-BeVgo
What is wrong with the American education system? CO2 Back-Radiation Sensitivity Studies under Laboratory and Field Conditions
Atmospheric and Climate Sciences, 2024, 14, 407-428
https://doi.org/10.4236/acs.2024.144025
https://www.scirp.org/pdf/acs2024144_44701276.pdf
>Data from ground measurements indicate that the downward (backward) radiation of the atmosphere shows indeed full saturation of the IR CO2 bands and does not support noticeable additional Thermal Forcing (TF) by increasing CO2 in the lower atmosphere… we can expect full saturation already at current concentrations.
This recent paper gives a good explanation of absorption limits and specifically for absorption limits for CO2, it might be of interest to the overwhelming majority of people who never studied enough physics to be able to run through the absorption limit calculation on their own, this includes pretty much everyone who didn't get a PhD in physics with a strong focus on the propagation of radiation.
Pic unrelated, file size is 6mb, slightly too big for 4chan press F to pay respects for her wonderful world bringing science to americans Adding fluoride to drinking water reduces IQ, so why do they do it?
It can't be for dental health because low IQ people will not be smart enough to care for their teeth properly, they will lack the foresight to do so and/or lack the brainpower to do a good job of it.
The only reasonable explanation seems to be that its done to intentionally reduce people's intelligence. What other reason would make sense? >Dutch scientists, who analysed data from 70.000 Brits, found those ate more unhealthy plant-based diet had a higher chance of suffering from frail. but this was even higher for some men
Now that its know that vegans are unhealthy, can science explain why are vegans so unhealthy?
Should vegans be forced to eat meat in order to have a healthier overall population?
We already vaccinate people in order to make the population healthier so enforcing a healthy diet seems like a logical net step. Could we remove psychopathic personality traits from the human gene pool by using DNA testing and would it be worth it? The month of November is almost up, which means that anyone who decided to participate in nofap should be starting to form an opinion about if the scientific claims of the nofap advocates are accurate or not.
Is there anyone where who performed the nofap experiment this year?
If so, what do you think the results of your experiment were?
Do they help to prove or disprove the nofap theory? Why is this considered a legit scientific approach? Liquid-in-glass thermometers too imprecise to detect global temperature trend since 1850.
Margin of error for average global temp 1900-2010 (3.84°C) is 4.5x larger than claimed warming of 0.86°C.
https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/23/13/5976 why can't space bros do anything right?
https://www.iflscience.com/cosmic-drama-first-picture-of-our-supermassive-black-hole-is-not-accurate-new-study-claims-76552 How come scientists keep on saying that eating beef is bad when it has so many health benefits? Would women still need to wear bras in zero-gravity? "Why?" I mean, why not?
(I have no background in healthcare or any field related to science btw)
Rate muh formula and post your score
(HBA1C in mmol/mol + BMI) / (total cholesterol / HDL)
>mine
(34+23)/4.43
= 12.9 What causes red meat to lower lifespans ? Surely theres something else we're missing, like people who eat red meat are more prone to exert more physical exercise throughout the day and that reduces longevity variably; compared to people who don't eat meat and aren't as "performant"? It just doesnt make any sense foods we grew up eating and evolving alongside with; is bad for us. Correlation doesnt equal causation.
Thoughts? Which ones could a short man kill? In theory increasing your pattern matching ability shouldn't be that hard right? experiments show that a person can get good at a singular task after repetition, so that "IQ" was hardwired, but their general intelligence has remained the same.
if you could induce controlled dementia (synapse pruning) combined with psychedelics on a brain that does nothing but solve problems for a period of time, plus the occasional stimulant. that should result in an increase of general ability. Where did all the aliens go? I'm learning logic. I had a discussion on another board. Can someone who knows a lot about logic comment on this discussion? Specifically how I (the OP), the Moldovan anon, and another Swede discussed how the fallacy can be either denying the antecedent or affirming the consequent. Yesterday I felt like I understood it but looking at it again today I'm confused.
>>>/pol/494305518
https://archived.moe/bant/thread/21913276/
https://archived.moe/bant/thread/21913276/#21913359
https://archived.moe/bant/thread/21913276/#21916009
It seemed to make sense that it could be either denying the antecedent or affirming the consequent. This made me wonder if denying the antecedent can always be rephrased as affirming the consequent and vice versa. But when I was going over the reasoning again to figure out if that's the case I got confused. >*randomly misfolds in your path*
What the FUCK do you do? I had an argument with a Pakistani chemistry teacher recently about atomic theory. I explained to him my belief that atomic structure as typically described in chemistry books is not an accurate representation of reality, but rather a heuristic device that allows us to more easily visualise chemical reactions and predict their outcomes.
We are taught that an atom is a configuration of protons and neutrons orbited by electrons in an equal number and of opposite charge to the proton number, and that reactions will occur to produce molecules that have a complete "outer shell" of electrons which are therefore stable and unreactive. But how close is this to what's actually going on?
I'm not a /sci/ guy, just a deluded dropout arguing about stuff I don't understand to while away the hours of a long shift by freaking out my colleague. I'd be interested to hear if any of my ramblings have merit and where I can learn more about a more realistic model of atomic anatomy. >If you just accept that this laundry list of assumptions is true, and take an infinite number of samples, then the chance of being a fucking liar is only 5%!
The justifications for these statistical tests are a series of asymptotic approximations. They also rely heavily on real analysis to construct continuous distributions from discrete ones so statistics professors just dump the complicated formulas on students as a given without proof or motivation.
With the advent of AI it's time to start teaching statistics completely differently, from the bayesian perspective. The focus needs to be less on ensuring you are making accurate causal assumptions and more on making flexible inferential models. Humans are not evolved to eat vegetables, we don't have an enormous digestive system like a horse or multiple stomachs like a cow, we have a small digestive tract like a carnivorous animal.
Eating vegetables causes cancer in humans.
pic unrelated as always This is not how science was meant to be used. Why are contemporary scientists so evil and greedy? Starship V2 maiden flight - edition
previous >>16550696 What is the current science of the biological clock? For example: how does the body know when it's time to trigger developmental mile stones like teeth and puberty? Is there research aimed at uncovering the fundamental principles of the biological clock or is understanding of the fundamental principles seen as a consequence of understanding the specifics of teeth, puberty, retardation, senescence, menstruation and such? if the Argentinosaurus was only discovered recently, then what is the ceiling to the size of undiscovered species on Earth? I'm no mathematician, but I wanted to see how you guys would solve this problem. Also there are 24 bombs left, Idk how useful the last information is. Are doctors glorified drug dealers?
You would think people with personal doctors would enjoy great health...
In reality they mostly end up drug-addicted and eventually dead from overdose. If the smartest man in the world was looking for big, important problems to solves. What would you have him do? Is bird flu worse than covid? Will they just burn the hospitals down if bird flu breaks out so no one can spread it? Explain to me why no terrorist or mass murderer has done the obvious plots yet? Are most of them just stupid? Or are the plots not really as feasible as I think they are?
For example, why wouldn’t a terrorist get a bunch of weather balloons and attach them to timed detonators that pop the balloon automatically after a few minutes or hours and then attach a bowling ball to them? So there would just be random 16-20 lb bowling balls falling over a mile high at a terminal velocity near 600 mph. Someone would not have to be very bright to do this, yet they could easily get away with it. There are many other plots I can come up with off the top of my head, yet I never see them on the news at all. Why is this? If even one out of a thousand people were crazy enough to do this, society would collapse overnight. Are people just good? Imagine you are participating in a game with a prize money, but there's a entry fee of $5,000.
The game has 1 challenge requiring skill (it's not hard, 99% of people can complete it), and then a coin toss game (gamble).
1) If you complete the 1st challenge, you get $10,000 and can obtain the money OR continue to the gamble.
2) The gamble goes as follow: You can lose your $10,000, or you can gain another $20,000, for a total of $30,000.
What is the, matematically, the optimal play, considering hundreds of people will play the game?
A) Always stop after the 1st challenge and take $10,000
B) Always gamble and either lose everything (including the entry fee) OR gain 3x more than you would gain for stopping. What happens, when you add another variable, while having a subscript?
If it's like this:
{a,b}2 = b&a;
What if i added a c?
{a,b,c}2 = ??? Does planck length mean space is pixelated? Let me get this straight, you believe that through the emergent properties of natural selection that the human mind has managed to hardness quantum mechanics and that in turn, leads to consciousness and agency? This is mind blowing. At what point in the past did our ooga booga ancestors start making decisions based on projected probabilities of quarks rather than their genes and enviroment like every other species? Can anyone explain BEAF in Googology? How does it work? Or can you recommend a site or smth, where i can learn stuff like that? >[...] and despite his gargantuan intellect, John von Neumann was constantly bullied by other scientists in the Manhattan Project for his failure to win a Nobel prize. Hans Bethe, who won a Nobel prize for discovering the fusion reaction that powered stars, would refer to him as "No Nobel Neumann" behind his back. This nickname would stick throughout the duration of World War Two. Enrico Fermi, who won a Nobel prize for discovering nuclear fission, would frequently wear his prize around his neck in the presence of von Neumann.
>But perhaps the grandest prank on von Neumann was played by Richard Feynman. One day Feynman called von Neumann in his office. Imitating a Swedish accent, he identified himself as a representative of the Nobel Prize committee. He told von Neumann that he had won a Nobel prize in physics, and later that afternoon a delegation would arrive in the auditorium to personally present it to him. Ecstatic, von Neumann rushed to the auditorium during lunchtime, where he found a full audience of his colleagues waiting. Feynman, in a bushy fake moustache and lederhosen, waddled onto stage. He passed a certificate for a "Theoretical Nobel Prize in Physics", and declared that only certainty in quantum mechanics was that von Neumann would contribute anything significant to it. Hybridising the Australian Musk Duck with the Australian Pink-Eared Duck to create a truly Aberrant Duck. For science!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BzhpTFnkKzc
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oh7U6M9gtgg This game is a true IQ test, because I say this without exaggeration or irony that this game is full of morons. So if you ever want to know what it feels like to have an IQ of 200, play this game on public lobbies. So this is clearly an interference pattern particle physics paper 50 years ago
>here’s an elegant way to endow chiral particles with mass inspired by methods in condensed matter physics
particle physics paper today
>dark matter Higgs portal axion sector without anomalies???
>in this totally original paper, we introduce a completely random gauge group and randomly assign representations to the SM particles
>this group is of course compact and semisimple because I’m too lazy to open a math textbook
>the reason because we chose this group and not some other is because… well it just magically works and I don’t know why
>we spend the rest of the paper spewing trendy buzzword salad and doing meaningless calculations to put all that shit on an experimentalists’ plot
>now gibs me money If biological evolution is real, then how did the eye evolve? Is the temperature fluctuation the reason Americans preffer wood houses over brick? Because i often hear that in America, concrete, bricks and tiles crack easier then in Europe. For years i thought time didn’t exist, just change and change is what we called time, being movement just a change in the position of an object, for example. That’s in the end how we measure time, the earth doing a 360 rotation being a day, and an atom in an atomic clock going from one edge to the other n times. We call the past all the previous movements or changes a tall levels. I was sure that time had a ‘direction’, and that the universe was like a billard that got hit once and the subatomic balls got in all directions but with the primitive force having one that defined the rest, so somehow we could ‘rewind’ universe if applied the equivalent force in the opposite direction. Anyway, it occurred to me that.. change CAN’T actually happen without time. Change and movement can happen if there’s a space AND a time dimension. Can someone give me a book or something to look at to understand or explore more this? I’m not scientific at all but this matter really intrigues me so ideally it would have to be a book for physic or math retards. bros how many more years do i have to wait until i am biologically allowed to sip coca cola and chew on hard foods 24/7, again?
i hate being a cripple that has to brush his teeth every day Really just a Blorg launch thread edition
Previous: >>16545695
Stream: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KXysNxbGdCg
Launch window: 1 a.m. - 4 a.m EST (0600-1000 UTC).
Launch site: LC-36, Florida, USA
First stage booster landing location: Landing Platform Vessel 1 “Jacklyn”
Orbit: 19300 x 2400 km @ 30°
Payload: https://www.blueorigin.com/news/blue-ring-pathfinder-payload
This is the first orbital launch of Blue Origin’s New Glenn rocket.
Other streams:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9hmOwYOO1G4 NSF
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oqW1OjVepCk EDA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0WbMyN3RcGc TLP
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-27UPcCiH08 SFN Intelligent minds of /sci/, is my bone exposed here or is this just healing tissue? I had my skin transplanted into my gum a week ago. Why do magnetic flux loops behave like flywheels? Why aren't we investing in virtually free energy? What do you mean zero is a natural number? If I was a caveman I would stone you. coincidences do not exist As a SWE, would I gain anything by self studying math/physics?
My parents are math and physics professors and I feel kind of a midwit for only having and undergrad degree and in cs Why is it
2+2=4
and not
2+2=5
?