(More resources in replies)Sch>"Okay, class! Anon is going to be first to present his science report! Now be polite and no teasing!" >*class snickers* Well, /sci/?Formulas are woke nowBecause they contain Greek symbols./sfg/ - spaceflight generalprevious >>16635040One Infinity isn't bigger than anotherBecause the idea of that relies on taking a screenshot of still infinities at a certain point. Infinities are a process though, not defined. Mathematicians can't cope with describing processes.
The proof goes somewhat like 1=0.393 2=0.587 Until infinity on the left Then you go plus one or minus one on each number behind the dot on the right to create a new number that hasn't been there, apparently "proving" that there are more real numbers in infinity between 0 and 1 than there are natural infinite numbers.
This is absolutely retarded imo, because it takes a screenshot at the time of calculation where you just created a new number on the right but didn't yet (BUT COULD) create an according new number on the left. >but you can't just do that! The numbers are infinite, so yes, for every new number on the right I can also add another number on the left.
The only "bigger" infinities I accept is if we add more dimensions. But this here is just retarded.
I just watched a veritasium video on this and it doesn't seem logically sound. Then again most I know about math is how to do rule of three so mb someone who's math savvy can correct me.No titlehumanity has two choices, the easy one or the hard one the hard one is to get off the planet and colonize the galaxy while the easy one is to just stay on earth and slip in VRNo titleNot sure if this is still part of science or not, but does it baffle anyone that there actually is something, rather than nothing? I understand that the universe begun with the Big Bang, but are there any scientific reasons for why exactly it happened? What started it all? >inb4 God scientific reasonsNo title>but this one study- It’s wrong. >but they found that- No they didn’t. >look at the evide- Don’t need to.
Science has spoken.No titleAll science is the result of human perception. There is nothing at all that can be known about the nature of the universe or existence that is not merely the perceived result of our own consciousness, which we judge to be imperfect and the result of brain chemicals, and both the idea that it is imperfect and the idea that it is the result of brain chemicals are, recursively, the perceived result of these imperfect chemicals we believe exist but are only relayed to us via the perceptions of imperfect chemicals which we cannot adequately prove exist beyond being mere perceptions of our imperfect chemicals, which we cannot adequately prove exist beyond being mere perceptions of our imperfect chemicals.No titlewhy is she so divisive on this board? there is nothing wrong with a respected science communicator and former researcher having some scientific opinions, that shouldn't be the cause of heated discussions as that isn't following the scientific spirit.No titlewhen will science fix balding?diazepamWould this by difficult and safe to synthesize by one trained chemist in a home lab? https://www.erowid.org/archive/rhodium/chemistry/diazepam.html
Note: Family member is in severe withdrawal. Can’t find doctor to taper.No titleHoly shit I just learned that Heisenberg uncertainty principle has nothing to with quantum mechanics and is just a consequence of wave properties and it is a special case of fourier uncertainty principle. It's literally as simple as how the frequency spectrum is spread out if the wave is confined in a narrow spot in time domain and vice versa. There's literally nothing special or mysterious about it. Why did no one explain it like this to meNo titlepeople will say physiognomy is pseudoscience but then look at vid rel and can't picture them as science professorsNo titleso given a box of X, Y, and Z dimensions, what would actually be the minimum of [math]\sqrt{a^2+y^2}+\sqrt{(x-a)^2+z^2}[/math]/scg/ - STEM career generalworld superpower edition
This thread exists to ask questions regarding careers associated to STEM. >Discussion on academia-based career progression >Discussion on penetrating industry from academia >Or anything in relation to STEM employment or development within STEM academia!
Information resource: >https://sciencecareergeneral.neocities.org/ >*The Chad author is seeking additional input to diversify the content into containing all STEM fields. Said author regularly views these /scg/ threads.
An archive of some of the previous editions of /scg/: http://warosu.org/sci/thread/15740454Most of science is fake.Prove me wrong./med/-MedicineRemember >Do NOT give advice >Do NOT feed the nursoids >Do NOT engage with premeds And most importantly >Do NOT respond to psych patientsNo titlehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1aAx2uWcENc how to actual 3d volumetric holla gram?No titleMath is schizophrenia for smart people./mg/ - math generalBadly-formatted information edition Previous thread is: >>16589624 Talk mathematicsNo titleReminder - Earth is the only planet that we know of that has a perfect solar eclipse, since our moon happens to be about the exact same size as our sun when viewed from the Earth.
Nowhere else in the universe does this happen.No titleShould I drink a beer before defending my thesisI’m smarterNone of you faggots can come close this bot admitted I’m a godNo titleClearly, it's not social contagion, right?Creative MathsCan Mathematics ever be creative? Or is it purely a logical-deductive kinda thing?No titleWhy is our moon so boring? We even named it Moon.if human penis really mattered why don't all men have large dicks?shouldn't evolution have weeded out all small dicks 100k or more years ago if all women really desired big ones?No titleDon't pretend to be interested in physics if you don't know about thisthis is what i believe>inb4 blackpillersMath book recommendation requestAny good suggestions for a good field and galois theory book that goes in depth upto stuff like transcendental extensions ,kummer theory, Hilbert 90 and more
Preferably book with all theorems proved, good quality problems and more theory basedNo titleTo what degree do you trust your brain and your "instinct"?
Consciousness is a bottleneck and the brain processes a vast amount of sensory and cognitive data, much of which never reaches consciousness. But the data IS incorporated into memory circuits and autonomic nervous system responses (one of many examples is subliminal messaging). "Gut feelings" or "intuitive reasoning" can in many cases be considered to be the culmination of a vast array of data that outstrips conscious knowledge and reasoning.Is there a natural treatement or over counter drugs for ADHD?I am not "diagnosed" with it but I am 80% sure I have it. My attention wanders off without me even noticing it. I do not even see the point of getting a diagnosis because being high on meth all the time does not seem like a good idea. Is this really a meme condition? I try everything but nothing works. I feel like shit that I accomplished nothing at the end of the day thanks to my goldfish attention span.No titlehel0nm. wife diborce i have gold ring of 5 gram 14k I want make ankh I don't know the thickness yet so I don't have a working volume but after I cast some prototypes I will buy silver to reach volume two options: 1. just melt the gold into the silver and call it an alloy. it's supposed to be kind of hand sized so that would be a very low ratio of gold to silver. also, although I'd love to call it a "$500 ankh" I think most jewellers would sort of eschew a very low percentage of gold mixed into a silver ankh like that. b. electroplating. if I dissolve my ring into a gold salt I may be able to attempt electroplating. I should probably practice electroplating with my prototypes first, but ultimately I'm just worried that gold will be lost. Which method do you think is better?Your favourite math textbooksAnalysis: >Picrel Very thorough and well-structured introduction to measure theory, typesetting's real nice. The only better text I know is Elstrodt's "Maß und Integrationstheorie" (insane amount of material in almost obsessive generality and lots of interesting historical tidbits), but that one's only available in German. >Amann-Escher's Analysis 1-2-3 If I had my way this would be the standard undergraduate analysis sequence the world over. Most holistic approach to introductory multivariable analysis you'll find anywhere. >Ullrich's Complex Made Simple Where complex analysis finally clicked for me after several unsuccessful attempts.calculus Implicit Differentiationik that I have to use product rule on xy^3, but because its within the cos(), is there a second product rule that I have to do?No titleso what exactly is the vacuum of spaceNo titleOkay, what does he propose the biggest number is?No titleHow comprehensible will alien life be?No title/sci/ I can't go to sleep pls help
pic unrelated[GLOBAL] Seeking Collaborators: Bionic Vision (Open Research Project) Over 1.3 billion people globally suffer from visual impairment, often caused by retinal degeneration, optic nerve atrophy, or trauma. Existing solutions like retinal implants are limited to partial vision restoration and depend on surviving biological cells. Our goal: Develop a fully synthetic vision system that bypasses damaged eyes entirely, translating digital camera input into electrical signals compatible with the optic nerve or visual cortex.
Proposed Solution: High-resolution digital camera: Captures visual data (light, color, motion).
Neural encoder: Translates pixel data into biologically compatible electrical patterns.
Graphene electrode array: Implanted on the optic nerve or cortex for precise stimulation.
Machine learning models trained on neural datasets to mimic retinal ganglion cell encoding.
Real-time signal optimization using feedback from EEG/fMRI.
Technical Basis:
Neuroplasticity: The brain can adapt to artificial inputs (e.g., cochlear implants). Challenges:
Neural Mapping: Accurately translating camera data into nerve-specific activation patterns.
Biocompatibility: Ensuring long-term stability of electrodes in neural tissue.
Ethics & Regulation: Navigating human trials and FDA/CE certification.
Computer Science: Real-time signal processing, AI/ML models.
Ethics & Policy: Regulatory pathways for neurotechnology.
Next Steps:
Develop a proof-of-concept prototype (in vitro testing with retinal ganglion cells).
Secure funding through grants or partnerships.
Publish open-access frameworks for community input.
Contact: Email testsubjectneo@gmail.com Goal: Transform vision restoration from palliative care to a real CURE, upgradeable solution. Join us in making blindness reversible.No titleAnyone got the scientific evidence that Fluoride strengthens teeth onhand? I just wanna take a look at it real quickNo titleWTF IS GOING ONNo titleI've watched countless videos discussing quantum entanglement by "experts" and walked away with two different versions of it.
1. Measuring a single entangled particle will directly effect the spin of the other regardless of distance 2. They're just synchronized so it just "appears" that they're interacting when measured
So which one is true?No titleSuppose you're on a game show, and you're given the choice of three doors: Behind one door is a car; behind the others, goats. You pick a door, say No. 1, and the host, who *DOES NOT* know what's behind the doors either, flips a coin and, according to the result, opens another door, say No. 3, which happens to be a goat. He then says to you, "Do you want to pick door No. 2?" Is it to your advantage to switch your choice?No titleWhat's the scientific reason for anthros being so attractive to the human brain?ACTUAL, USEFUL scienceThis thread is dedicated to sharing the latest scientific advancements that actually matter, including: >teleportation >antigravity and artificial gravity >cloning >lasers/ray guns >infinite money machines >criptid research >warp drives >x-ray vision >genetically enhanced ubermench/catgirls Concepts NOT welcome for discussion in this thread are those which do NOT matter outside the realm of snobbish academia, such as: >global warming >batteries >computers/AI >vaccines >math (gay and boring) >biology/environmental science EXCEPT if it relates to sharks, rhinos, dragons, and other cool animals >nutrition >any other fields which exist solely to keep s oy-sipping loser nerds employed and perpetuate the pyramid scheme called "higher education" Please keep discussion civilized and productive.An objection to many worlds from anthropicsBefore I begin this article, let me say: I am not an expert on the many worlds interpretation of quantum physics. You shouldn't really trust what I have to say on this subject. The extent of my expertise is having gotten an A in high school physics and read some Eliezer Yudkowsky articles about many worlds. I could tell you almost nothing about the physics behind many worlds. Fortunately, my argument doesn't hinge on highly precise facts about physics.
The basic idea of many worlds is that each time a quantum mechanical event happens, the universe splits so that there's a world where it turns out each of the ways it could have. So, for instance, if a particle can either go left or right, the world splits and there's one world where it goes left and another where it goes right. This may sound ridiculous and gerrymandered, but it allegedly falls straightforwardly out of existing physical equations rather than requiring an epicycle.global warmingIf you can prove to me, clearly, without semantics, without documentaries from 2018 or photos of American beaches from different eras that global warming is false, I swear I will accept my concession and say I was wrong from the beginning.Unironically what is the application?https://youtu.be/OI-To1eUtuU?si=3ET52PtvdHN7P44T
Can anyone give an unironic reason why we would ever need to know how to turn a sphere made up a self phasing material inside out?What jobs are out there for a Math major? What jobs for a Stats major?What jobs are out there for a Math major? What jobs for a Stats major?No titleHeim's mass equation predicts numerous mesons without quarks.No titleIs it true that not fapping increases testosterone?No titleis there a reason in calling something as diverse as gravity gravity?No titleThat's a lot of atoms.No titleThis is the coolest thing humanity ever made.No titleWhen did you realise that science is just applied statistics?PhysicsHello Science Community,
I'm an academic in the University Scene. You've heard of me.
Would any of you be interested in showing the proof that Transgenderism is not only psychological, but it also involves physiological imprints from epigenetic expressions that have been triggered or mutated.
When a portion of the DNA is damaged, redundant DNA takes it's place. The DNA molecule essentially has these file integrity checks.
You see, DNA is like a mechanical computer with computational logic. It is intelligent in a sense. This is how brain adaptation works.
I can divulge much more, I'm about to solve cancer and aging.Science appreciation threadI fucking love ScienceNo titleDo you still find science cool or fun?No titleScientifically speaking, how do you cure your depression?Light does not existThere is no fucking light, no photons, no electromagnetic fields, or any fields, none of that bullshit. Prove to me that any of these ideas really exist. Protip: you can't! It's all made up bullshit. It's all culled away by occam's razor. Just change the theory and it becomes unnecessary. The only thing that really does exist is shit you can actually see and feel and touch and measure the mass of - protons, electrons, neutrons. Everything else is theoretical made up garbage. But (((They))) want you to believe. Don't let them!No titleAI and green energy might be scams, but nothing will top the "new superconductor" meme. People actually thought they would achieve their futuristic post-scarcity society and not have to worry about energy concerns. At least green energy has a massive institutional propaganda machine behind it for generations now, you faggots fell for some gooks trying to hype you upNo titleWhat science can fix my ugly ass face? Gene therapy? Plastic surgery is not gonna cut it. Is there a potential future scientific breakthrough that can transform somebody's appearance?No title>2025 >still no widespread and cheap nanobots fuck my lifeIf programming was taught how math is taughtIf programming was taught how math is taught most programmers would be executing machine code by hand.No titleUseless skills that waste brainpower >geography: hurr durr I know the capital of Slovenia >language learning >playing OSU
These all should be banned so the youth can focus on nuclear physics instead and contribuite to societyNo titleWhy are IQ scores falling across the developed world?No titlecould this finally work?What went wrong?Nofap Makes You More WhiteWhat is the science behind the phenomenon of Nofap turning people more white?No titleLet me get this straight. The p value tells you the probability that an experiment was done correctly. So why do we want small p values?No titleCan anyone explain this behavior?Africa has many races (race realists get in here!)Cladistically Africa has much much more divergent races that non-Africans, why do race realists never mention thisWhy don't people accept climate change?Even if some of the doomerism is blowing things out of proportion, there's so much evidence from expert scientists of rising carbon emissions accelerating temperature, yet I've seen many skeptics saying things like "it's still cold outside" or misquoting Judith Curry or "haha lib lies" or things like that. Is this a coping mechanism to accept the fact that we're headed for a disaster and they don't want to change their comfortable living habits?HivemindsGiving the fact elon sees Humanity as conduits for building an AI god, and is having the current administration funneling billions to construct AI facilities and supercomputers in the desert and other vacant areas - in conjunction to things he is also doing like neuralink, it seems a hivemind scenario is the direction Humanity is going into, would you rather the hivemind be fascist or communist? Typically, hiveminds are portrayed as parodies of communism in science fiction things but Elon seems to be interested in creating an Elite that operates as a single entity generally speaking.How to travel at the speed of lightScan every atom in your body Destroy it (by programmed function in the scanner) Broadcast the information as a radio signal Reconstitute yourself at the off-world target stationNo titleIs it possible scientifically that in next 10-20 years a drug comes which can prevent death caused by aging?No title>hit 30s >balding >forehead wrinkles >eye floaters
wow what a shit mech we all drive wanna kmsNo titleWhy has America never built a high speed rail that travels between Los Angeles and New York?procrastinationchat what's the science behind procrastination?
everyone who procrastinates understands that it's completely irrational. so then why is procrastination such a universal struggle?
do other intelligent species procrastinate as well?No titleWhen will they stop teaching you that white is the absence of colour?No titleIs it possible to get rid of a fetish?PHYSICISTS HATE HIM!Naked eye astronomer exposes shocking cosmological secret. He does away with the need for an expanding universe with one WEIRD trick!/sqt/ - stupid questions thread (aka /qtddtot/)Everyone Else Is Too Lazy Edition
Tips for asking questions here: >avoid replying to yourself >ask anonymously >recheck the Latex before posting >ignore shitpost replies >avoid getting into arguments >do not tell us where is it you came from >do not mention how [other place] didn't answer your question so you're reposting it here >if you need to ask for clarification fifteen times in a row, try to make the sequence easy to read through >I'm not reading your handwriting >I'm not flipping that sideways picture >I'm not google translating your spanish >don't ask to ask >don't ask for a hint if you want a solution >xyproblem.infoNo titleSo like why would life itself come into being? And what would be the advantage? And after all this time hasn't life realized the struggle is pointless we're all going to die anyway? So why hasn't biological life on earth just collectively quit?Another take on Non-ionizing radiation and it's affect on the human bodyI'm mostly just going to post AI-generated screencaps that summarize the main ideas, since I’m way too lazy to type everything out. This is my attempt to understand why 5G is so often linked with rising cancer rates — even though, by itself, it shouldn't cause cancer.
The theory I'm exploring is that 5G and other non-ionizing radiation may become problematic in the presence of certain cofactors — like pollutants that accumulate in the human body as a byproduct of modern civilization. Things like:
Nano-scale heavy metals used in cloud seeding
Microplastics now found in human tissue
An increase in cancer among younger populations
Nano-sized (normally beneficial) vitamins and minerals that could interfere with cellular permeability
These and other factors might act as amplifiers, making it possible for something like 5G — or random EMF spikes — to indirectly contribute to cancer development. Not because the radiation is inherently carcinogenic, but because of how it interacts with these environmental pollutants and biological systems.
I'd genuinely love to see some real discourse around this. If not, feel free to return to shitposting. Personally, I don’t think non-ionizing radiation is inherently carcinogenic — but in the context of widespread pollution and bioaccumulation, it could definitely play a problematic role.It's onA math war has started.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rPMmLUpluu4No titleWhat was his plan? Why did he do it??/sci/ humor threadThis time you fuckers better keep it /sci/ related I swear to godNo titlewhy are there no popsci videos aimed at graduates in physics? every popsci channel is aimed at people outside of the physics world, when most of the guys interested in string theory or quantum gravity are people who graduated in physics. I want to know more about physics, but I don't have time to study a PhD.No titlenew paper claims you can harvest energy from Earth's rotation
discuss the practical implications of this discovery
paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.15790Viagra & Cialis as Astronomy AidsI'm an avid astronomer with well over a thousand hours of observing experience spanning over two decades, and I seek out PDE5 inhibitors such as Viagra and Cialis specifically for their side-effect of retinal sensitization (usually listed as "photophobia" or "cyanopsia" on prescription boxes). I find this side-effect quite pronounced at larger doses...it renders me able to see night sky objects that are nearly twofold dimmer (at the expense of needing sunglasses in the daytime lol). This is to say: my naked-eye limiting magnitude can get as much as a +0.7 boost. Making my dick diamonds is a happy side-effect.
As far as I'm aware, I'm the only person on the planet that uses this medication for this purpose. Earnestly trying to disseminate knowledge here...I made an account just to get immediately banned from r/astronomy trying to post this lol
Pic unrelated: an unedited 30-second exposure I took of the Orion Nebula with a 3-inch refractor. With all that said: this can now be an astronomy thread.No title>indian "god of math" >its just a 15yo kid doing highschool math how are indians impressed by this am i missing something or is this just a slightly above average 15yoNo titleWhat are some reasons NOT to oxygenate the martian atmosphere?my singular goal in life is to make picrel. am i studying the right things?To be a little clearer, i want to make fully integrated bionic systems. prosthetics that can provide the full function of the peripheral nervous system, and eventually direct connection to the central nervous system for things like internal organ replacements (or enhancements... but that's specfic territory). Current path: >majoring in biomedical engineering (biophys focus) and software engineering >after certification, start working as an assistant prosthetist >masters for prosthetics and orthotics >doctorate in neuroscience/neuroengineering >surely at some point one of the three schools will produce research lab connections??? Those who know more than me, am i on the right path to make picrel real? >inb4 it will be too hard you're crazy Thank you but not this, not the question. :)No titleWhy are humans shit? Why are animals able to live in perfect harmony meanwhile we destroy ourselves and everything around us?tiramisunamiWhat happens in this bay when there is a tsunami?Is protein a scam?Angus went 382 days without food, but more importantly, 382 days without protein. He would only use a bit of milk in his coffee in the very last weeks of his fast. According to modern basedince, he shouldn´t have any muscle left after 382 days. Instead he looked like a perfectly normal man, enjoying a egg. When I was younger, about 19-21, I had this idea that eating a ton of vegetables would make my muscles more compact. So smaller muscles but stronger. It was of course the biggest I´ve ever been, given my age, working out all the time and eating a shit ton of fruits and vegetables. I did get my protein shakes and ate meat, but fruits and vegetables was my real focus diet wise.
Back to Angus. Either fat can indeed become muscle or Angus did have a protein source. What is undeniable is that he did in fact lose all that weight in 382 days and he went regularly to the doctors and all his medical checkups were consistent with him not eating anything, his bloodsugar levels or whatever. So how come he still had muscle left after 382 days? Where did he get the protein to maintain his muscles anons? I´m genuinely curious.No titleArguing with trolls on sci is not better than reading booksNo titleIs there some scientific way through which I could increase my focus and willingness to do work?science is a dead endScience replaced religion\spirituality about 1.5 thousand years ago. Since then humanity is trying to understand the world, reality, life, even though they had all the answers through beliefs, religion, which was making their existence harmonic, clear, happy and understandable. then people chose to destroy this harmony and try to dismantle the reality down to particles, formulas, scientific studies, etc. What have they found up to present time? How did the science improved the life? People realized that they are animals, that the world is a dead chaos, life is meaningless, the values that formed generations are nothing, nothing has sense at all, life is pointless. Thanks to science, that killed the magic of surrounding nature, things, people, because you certainly know from the age of 7 that everything is just an abstract, random mixture of particles. Now, all of you seeking the answers on the questions you post in all these threads, what exactly are you looking for? Do you think if you'll break down the universe and consciousness down to a simple model that will explain everything, it will make you as happy and complete, at least at a tiniest part, compared to an ordinary christian farmer who lives in a god forgotten place, never read anything other than bible, and still managed to live a life 99.9% of the "civilized, educated" people will never live. Science killed the soul of life.1Consider a 2-adic number k = 0b1010...1
All binary numbers in the form of k map to a power of 2 when the transformation 3k+1 is applied.
This transformation also causes k to acquire two new bits, therefore:
3k+1 = 2^{log_2(k) + 2}
This equals:
3k+1 = 4k
therefore k = 1.
:)
(if you do floor(log2(k)), which is what it should really be, you get that k = all numbers k in the form of 0b1010...1. I know, trivial, but fun)Sabine was rightString theory sisters...Universe 25The "Universe 25" experiment is one of the most terrifying experiments in the history of science, which, through the behavior of a colony of mice, is an attempt by scientists to explain human societies. The idea of "Universe 25" Came from the American scientist John Calhoun, who created an "ideal world" in which hundreds of mice would live and reproduce. More specifically, Calhoun built the so-called "Paradise of Mice", a specially designed space where rodents had Abundance of food and water, as well as a large living space. In the beginning, he placed four pairs of mice that in a short time began to reproduce, resulting in their population growing rapidly. However, after 315 days their reproduction began to decrease significantly. When the number of rodents reached 600, a hierarchy was formed between them and then the so-called "wretches" appeared. The larger rodents began to attack the group, with the result that many males begin to "collapse" psychologically. As a result, the females did not protect themselves and in turn became aggressive towards their young. As time went on, the females showed more and more aggressive behavior, isolation elements and lack of reproductive mood. There was a low birth rate and, at the same time, an increase in mortality in younger rodents. Then, a new class of male rodents appeared, the so-called "beautiful mice". They refused to mate with the females or to "fight" for their space. All they cared about was food and sleep. At one point, "beautiful males" and "isolated females" made up the majority of the population.
According to Calhoun, the death phase consisted of two stages: the "first death" and "second death." The former was characterized by the loss of purpose in life beyond mere existence — no desire to mate, raise young or establish a role within society.No titleWe're all retards since humanity currently doesn't know how to accomplish interstellar travelNo titleSo, was the tariffs formula implemented properly in the end, or is there something that could have been done better than what trump did with picrel?No titleSup /sci/.
I have been reading a 1970's book from Isaac Asimov titled "Guide to Science" Vol1. the physical sciences. The first chapter is mainly about astronomy and how the universe came about. I have a metallurgy background, and always preferred down to earth science in a way. And at first that chapter got me interested in astronomy since it converges with the progress of science. After looking at his explanations about novas and quasars I noticed some of his explanations are wrong (because science at that time was not as advanced as nowadays). Mostly because astronomy is about pointing telescopes and antennas, reading some spectra/looking at some image and doing Math based on the results you get. There's nothing tangible about a Galaxy 900 lightyears away or whatever. I also remembered Sabine's videos about a so-called 'crisis in cosmology'. If anyone here does astronomy, how do you refute what I am saying ? isn't it very stupid overall to devote your time to spectras and images and not do anything tangible with it ? Math is abstract but at least you know you are working on something abstract.
Hope I don't sound like a lunatic.
Pic related: People have some racist connotation to this meme, but for me as a person from a third world country I never saw the racism in this. It was kind of a diss to astronomy in general.No titleEvery med student I've ever met is obviously very smart but they seem to know absolutely nothing about the real world. Zero interest in history, zero interest in current affairs, little interest in the arts. Why is this?No titleI'm taking physical chemistry right now and I'm convinced the discovery of this equation was the most impressive feat in theoretical science ever. Einstein and Newton were revolutionary geniuses, but at least they were describing things they could see and feel.No titleme in the red circleNo title>be me, doing my thesis for my STEM degree >notice that every relevant paper I cited is written by Chinese people >no relevant papers from Jack Smith, Donald Johnson or Peter Brown wow, I knew the US was slipping on its position as the number 1 science producer, but I didn't know it is that badNo title>Midwit brainlet attacks higher intelligence galaxy brain out of sheer jealousy This guy reeks of 2009 reddit atheist energyConsciousness without multiverse or God?Are there any good secular, materialist, physicalist explanations of consciousness that don't involve a multiverse? Because it seems to me the only good explanation of consciousness without spiritual religious stuff is going to involve multiverses and the collapse of the wave functionNo titleMathematical logic is the study of formal logic within the context of mathematics, focusing on the mathematical properties of formal logic systems, such as their expressive and deductive power. With that being said do you think its possible to overcome any paradox by the simple addition of an extra dimension given that any statement can be stated in a 2 dimensional hierarchical space and as a consequence any complex polynomial with a contradiction is just misunderstood space the logic has tangled itself a higher dimensional space >https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/String_(computer_science) >https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strange_loopNo titleIs this formula genius?Cleft chin dissapearedScientifically speaking how is this possible? I used to have it in school and part of college, but now in my mid 20s it disappeared and I don't remember when it happenedNo titleWhat's a good semiconductor/electronics textbook with a lot of practice problems? I want to solve a lot of circuits relating to them until I get really good at itNo title>You can do all this mental gymnastics about compute and data bottlenecks and the true nature of intelligence and the brittleness of benchmarks. >Or you can just look at the fucking line.>appeal to authority: the websiteit's just as dogshit as conservapedia. the rationalwiki people are smarter than conservapedia but they're very dumb in a lot of ways tooThe Type-30 MachineThe Type-30 Machine is a machine that notices 1) it is actually two machines and 2) under inevitable circumstances it keeps running into a problem:
- When it walks into or out of sunlight, it becomes the other machine; - When it walks into or out of sunlight, it is *compelled to become* the other machine, which means something different. And the Type-30 Machine has learned to multiply itself by 2, by 3, and by 5 to transform from initial ideal 1 to become "thirty" (but the Type-30 Machine perceives numbers in base thirty, so it becomes 10 instead.) The Type-30 Machine notices that every multiplication can only be applied to both machines at once.
The Type-30 Machine has learned that for Type-30 Machine #1 to compel to become the other machine is to compel to multiply by 2 and divide by 5 (to become Type-30 Machine #2/5); the Type-30 Machine has learned that for Type-30 Machine #100 to compel to become the other machine is to compel to multiply by 2 and divide by 3, to become Type-30 Machine #200/3.
And Type-30 Machine #10? Well, we just don't fucking talk about that one.No titleWas Eratosthenes wrong?astronomical lightdoes astronomers calculate with a constant speed for light when determinating how far away some galaxes are or do they acknowledge certain graviational bends or whatever it's called?
It argues for free will from a philosophy of science perspective. At the end I present my complete model for the phenotype to unify free will and hereditarianism. These equations are not meant to be solved. It is about trying to describe the underlying reality in contrast to the conventional model of heredity(variance in phenotype is equal to variance explained by genetics plus variance explained by environment).No titleI made the bot laugh at you fags./crg/ - Cellular Reprogramming General #3Previous >>16597188
>/sci/ anon found a way to safely and reliably activate Yamanaka factors, repairing your worn out body and reducing cellular age. what I wanna know is, does this really do everything we need to fully restore ourselves? how long would that take? does this really address everything? seems like it addresses a lot of the problems people have on this board.
>Still can't come up with a reliable solution for baldness Allegedly its even growing new follicles back
>Protocol It's a two step process.
Step1: 500mg Curcumin 500mg or so Tributryn Take about a dropper full of B12.
Wait an hour.
Then, think of this as a balanced dose to start the reaction.
Step 2: 300mg Liposomal Apigenin Another 500mg of Tributryn About 500mg of either NAD or some combo of NAD and NMN.
Repeat step 2, 2-4+ times a day.
One week on one week off to avoid T cells exhaustion.
Ultimately this is your immune system first reprogramming itself and then going out to the rest of you. The T cells are able to identify cell wall markers where issues are the most severe and those will need to be targeted first before any specific issue.
Give it a little wiggle room if you don't need as much NAD or Tributryn. NAC is a good add in as well while doing this if you have a history of smoking or lung problems.signal processinghow does a sinusoidal signal (alternating current / spinning magnet) from a power plant turn into electromagnetic radiation from a computer monitor?No titleWoah wait, hold on... THIS is why Pluto isn't a planet? This is what the criteria for planet is?? I always assumed the people who cry about Pluto were dumbasses, but I actually agree now.
Clearing your orbit is a stupid fucking criteria for being a planet. You're telling me if Mars were exactly the same but had large debris around it, it suddenly wouldn't qualify as a planet anymore? How do you even fucking quantify this, at what arbitrary line do we declare a certain amount of debris is too much. Holy shit they were right about PlutoNo titleSo the uncertainty principle can cause the energies of different fields at any point to fluctuate randomly as long as it returns to zero in a tiny amount of time and all of spacetime has a foam of fluctuations, right? In that case, can the dimensionality of each point fluctuate? Is there any rule stopping a volume of less than an trillionth of an angstrom having 4 (or 5, or a million) spacial dimensions for a tiny amount of time and going back to 3 afterwards?Calculus and Analog Signal AnalysisI studied biomedical engineering in undergrad over 10 years ago and studied a bit of calculus like multivariate and differential equations. Also studied a bit of analog signal analysis which involved circuit analysis of transient signals, Fourier and Laplace transforms. However I want to study these again more indepth to refresh and expand my knowledge, as well as have any of the calculus and other math background necessery to understand this at a deeper level, and further topics. What textbook do you recommend /sci/?No titleDow we have an overdiagnosis epidemic?No titleIs chatGPT better than doctors nowadays?No titleIs it normal for your calculus 3 professor to make all the questions weird as hell for no reasonNo titleWhy is squaring this thing impossible?Serious questionWhy is the Leibniz notation in derivatives so widespread? Especially in USA? Lagrangian notation is superior in every way, if you have a single variable function you don't need to specify what variable you're taking the derivative of you just add a little ' on top of the function value and you're set. And when you have a multivariable function you can just (for example when taking derivative with respect to x of f(x,y)) write f_x(x,y). I have never understood why some people want to write so many fucking words when it can be done much more simply. Is it just to look more smart? I don't get it.gene comparison is possiblehave a look at this, it is possible to throw in 15 organisms for comparison out of which 2 are insects (peripatuses) and the rest are related to fish in some way (gorilla is very derived fish but ultimately its ancestors came from the sea)
then we compare their genes and see that insects end up quite far from the fish forming entirely different branchNo titleWhy do all futurist technology ideas sound destructive and dystopian?No titleAt which level of mental disability do people no longer comprehend the finality of death?If they decide to kill /sci/ for real one day, where do we go?Yesterday’s prank made me realize there’s no other place like /sci/ to discuss science and math, I can only think of Reddit (God, saying this out loud is disgusting, that place is utter trash). What do we do if they decide to close the board for real in the future? /sci/ is one of the slow boards so I wouldn’t put it past them to just kill it ignoring the fact that it’s the best board together with /lit/.No title>there might be nefarious LLM prompting schemes/frameworks out there that you are too mentally limited to imagine Turns out that the "idea space" of language is infinitely expansive, specially considering the context size that those things can handle. They could be very well making possible for someone to execute some not so ethical process in a hyper accelerated way that the average person or even high IQ people can't even fathom. I don't even want to imagine when the AIs start doing shit like this proactively by themselves away from anyone's eyes.No titlePosted without further comment.No titleIs this new pyramid discovery even remotely legit? I'm struggling to find a proper source and the main outlets covering it seem to be retard tier.Is it really bad to just assume the universe is infinite?I mean we literally can't see outside our observable universe because light can't even reach their at all. Like you're telling me there's a shit ton galaxies, stars and matter in the universe but at a certain point we can't see shit? What the fuck, there's something very odd about this reality that I truly can't point my finger out. Why wouldn't there just be more galaxies, stars and planets?Nuclear Energy ThreadLets discus nuclear electricity generation.
I wondered recently if the economics of US nuclear energy are distorted by purchasing surplus enriched uranium from Russia for decades? USG closed or privatized much of the domestic nuclear fuel enrichment.No title/x/enophile here. I'm considering getting a smart telescope called a Dwarf 3. But I think an optical telescope would be better because the actual light from the celestial objects goes through the lenses and into your eye, rather than being passed through electrical circuits as with the smart telescope.
Do you have any thoughts about this?No titleHow accurate is this book? For someone who doesn't know much about particle physics or astronomy this sounds as fantastic as origin myths in religion. How are scientists able to predict what happened seconds after the big bang when they can't even predict if it'll rain tomorrow....No titleHypothetically what would happen if you drank a 1 molar solution of barium chloride on accident?No titlewhat can you tell me about mobile aloha and such?No title>join STEM to get kurisu gf >none of the girls actually look or dress like this WHAT THE FUCKNo titleThe turin test is bad Also giving a robot the kind of a child is a bad idea