https://4chan-science.fandom.com/wiki//sci/_Wiki
(More resources in replies)
Back | Go to board
Board: /sci/
"/sci/ - Science & Math" is 4chan's board for the discussion of science and math.
https://4chan-science.fandom.com/wiki//sci/_Wiki
(More resources in replies)
Is it even possible today?
"Turn back the hourglass once over again."
"So, it's all there, together, then?"
"Hah. With what, time?" He continued, "I have all the time in the world, and
you want me to what, undo the striking of the hour hand? ...I don't think you
understand. Not this time. Not for you."
"What - that's our partnership, untied?" His former stopped, like a good breakup will.
Sigh. The man who had all of the time halted it, instead: "And for you, that you will stay
trapped here, like a mouse in my pocket? No, that would be too good for you, that you would
see all that we have done undid in an instant!"
"Yeah. And what did that cost you, besides the death of yourself? You think that timepiece
will save you like it did your father? You will see that there is no life after this one."
"And you - you will see that there is no time like the present!"
A world snapped out of place for the concerned man, pulling his body and face into the ground
twice as hard... space-time had began unravelling itself, celestial bodies beginning to re-trace
each molecule through the beginning of time.
...so which side of the planet would he need to stand to
fall off and watch the planet move away back through time, instead?
>inb4 the top
>wormholes are le bad
>fusion is le bad
i hate this stupid chud universe
During my tests, I stay in a closed space with no wind and no moving of any sort.
I use thick incences that produce more smoke.
Alright, so, in my observations I see that as soon as smoke gets into laminar flow it automatically connects with the brain. (I wonder what would happen if there were two people, how the smoke would behave).
When your brain is under more beta frequencies, the smoke usually has less phases and it is harder to see any abnormal paterns.
But the magic starts when the brain kinda relaxes and lowers it's frequency to alpha. The smoke that was under LAMINAR FLOW starts changing phases and creating rings and spirals that all people are used to see.
These spirals and rings are connected to the brain and and synchronize with it's frequencies. When one is able to focus and and starts to understand what is happening, the smoke assumes forms and shapes that WOULDN'T be there otherwise. The brain can even manipulate and twist shapes with it's thoughts.
I have been doing this for a while but never got to film it yet, as im not rich and would possibly need to have expensive cameras that can slow down time, as these are really subtle things. I encourage other people to try it out and discuss about it.
Since the beginning my studies have led me to WAVE FUNCTION COLAPSE. The idea is that under laminar flow, the smoke assumes a function pattern that is broken as soon as someone OBSERVES it. Exactly like quantum phenomena, but this can actually be seen in a macroscopic environment.
Pic related is the Andromeda Galaxy which, as you may know, is the largest galaxy in the Local Group (the Milky Way is the second largest).
Previous Thread: >>16441427
This thread exists to ask questions regarding careers associated to STEM.
>Discussion on academia-based career progression
>Discussion on penetrating industry from academia
>Or anything in relation to STEM employment or development within STEM academia!
Resources for protecting yourself from academic marxists:
>https://www.thefire.org/ (US)
>https://www.jccf.ca/ (Canada)
Information resource:
>https://sciencecareergeneral.neocities.org/
>*The Chad author is seeking additional input to diversify the content into containing all STEM fields. Said author regularly views these /scg/ threads.
No anons have answered your question? Perhaps try posting it here:
>https://academia.stackexchange.com/
An archive of some of the previous editions of /scg/:
http://warosu.org/sci/thread/15740454
Are the alarmists just scaremomgering?
>"Boomer / zoomer" took off because of a single dedicated spammer autist
>"chudjak" took off thanks to a single dedicated spammer autist
>"virgin vs chad" took off thanks to a single dedicated spammer autist
Why aren't you nolifing your MS paint drawings all over 4chan, anon? You too could brainwash millions of retarded lemmings into adopting whatever memes and vernacular you want, purely by means of astroturfing, to the point where literal politicians and famous people start using it like the dumb cattle they are. Even the people who resist yoyr memes will cave in and submit to them once all their friends and peers start using them, so they'll cuck into using your meme to fit in. Its literally so easy, so why aren't you doing it?
And to make this thread /sci/ related, what are the long term societal and structural consequences of being able to program millions of people just by dedicating yourself to neurotically spamming the same memes over and over again repetitively?
I think its pretty obvious at this point that humanity is almost certainly going to annihilate its self.
Perhaps that is just the inevitable outcome of all species that has the greed necessary to not go extinct and also the intellect/disposable thumbs to into technology, plus, the power necessary for interstellar travel being much less than whats necessary to sudoku
The 2 astronauts are stuck on the ISS, and they're quickly running out of oxygen. Time is ticking.
Who can save these stranded astronauts?
How is this piece of technology, which costs $3,000,000,000 a year to run ($150,000,000,000 total to develop + launch), failing this badly?
I am still curious why Loon failed while starlink succeeded. With the cost of space launch included Starlink is actually far more expensive. The idea of a floating platform seems incredibly powerful to me so I am curious why a company like spaceX wouldn't be more invested in LTA research.
2020: 11 excess heart attack deaths
2021: 75 excess heart attack deaths
2022: 111 excess heart attack deaths
2023: 147 excess heart attack deaths
A 1,236% increase compared to 2020.
Moreover, cardiac arrest deaths, in general, rose about 25% from 2020 to 2023.
In the same time frame, King County's population shrunk slightly. Reflecting on this alarming data, Dr. Peter McCullough said, “So it looks like the vaccines are the smoking gun.” “This is now fully peer-reviewed in the emergency medicine literature. We've messaged the Medic One unit in Seattle. They clearly need to do more research to figure out how soon these vaccines were administered and to whom.”
>Excess cardiopulmonary arrest and mortality after COVID-19 vaccination in King County, Washington
https://www.opastpublishers.com/open-access-articles/excess-cardiopulmonary-arrest-and-mortality-after-covid19-vaccination-in-king-county-washington.pdf
I accept that I will forever be a simpleton, incapable of understanding concepts so unimaginably complex to me but to you is just another Tuesday. Your genius is unbounded, exponentially far greater than I could ever hope to dream on even getting a 10th of it. So I only say to you, congratulations, for having the one of the greatest gifts/powers of mankind, while for me, the only thing I know is that I know nothing.
>Carnivores breaking them
No carnivore in the environment was powerful enough to break a mastodon femur mid-shaft, and the patterns of breakage are consistent with percussion, not gnawing.
>Animals trampling them
Trampling from animals leaves a certain pattern which is absent from the site, plus a majority of the weaker bones aren't broken.
>A flood breaking them
Given that there's no size, shape, or density separation of the bones and rocks, this precludes flooding being involved (small teeth that should be washed down stream a mile away are right next to entire tusks and heavy boulders). It also wouldn't make sense for a flood powerful enough to shatter rocks and break mastodon femurs to not also break the weaker bones.
>Construction breaking them
This can't be for a few reasons, mainly because the bones were encased in a layer of unbroken pedogenic carbonate (If a machine broke the bones it would also break the pedogenic carbonate), and because shards of the bones were found far away from the bones themselves (which would be impossible for the shards to travel that far underground).
Is there anything I'm missing? Doesn't this leave hominins as the only option, thus indisputably proving they were in the Americas at least 130K years ago?
prev: >>16451314
What is the right STEM major for me?
No progress in over two decades. Before that life expectancy only kept on increasing, but now its declining.
Whats wrong with the current crop of medical scientists? Why are they so incompetent?
Is it good or bad?
What are Joel Salatin's specific ideas about it and are they tried and true or are they untested and potentially dangerous?
Is he a headcase or is he legit?
Are we all going to starve to death because retarded organic hippies are taking over the FDA and rolling back all the modern scientific progress in agriculture?
They provide me with a few months of training but I wanna get a head start. Can anyone recommend any good courses, books, etc.?
What does Chickenpox do to the baby and how can the negative effects be negated?
What percentage of mathematical research is done with computers nowadays?
>Prove there is a unique set A in the power set of U such that for every B in the power set of U, the intersection of A and B is equal to A.
Is my proof valid?
>Suppose A is an element of P(U). Let A = the empty set. Since the intersection of any set with the empty set is the empty set, then for every subset B that is an element of P(U), the intersection of A and B is A. Thus there exists an A in P(U) such that the intersection of A and B is A.
>Suppose A' is an element of P(U) such that the intersection of A' and B is A'. Suppose B=A, then the intersection of A' with A is simply A'. But since A is the empty set, then the intersection of A with A' is A. Thus we can conclude that A=A'. This proves uniqueness.
Correct or am I retarded?
>inb4 hurr homework question durrr
Not homework, teaching myself from a text book.
a choice must be either:
caused (determined)
not caused (random)
that's it. just like a number must be even or odd.
there's no third option - "free will" isn't even a coherent possibility.
if you think free will is a third option:
how is it not caused by anything but also not random?
how does it escape either having causes or not having them?
self-causation is impossible.
any counter argument runs into this inveitable wall of logic
therefore, I present you: The Inevitable Conclusion:
free will would require impossible self-causation
therefore free will cannot exist
determinism is the only logical option
everything must be caused by prior events
no exceptions possible
cope + seethe + dilate, sci trannies.
[eqn]
f(x) =
\begin{cases}
\frac{1}{q} & \text{if } x = \frac{p}{q}, \text{where } p,q \in \mathbb{Z} \text{ are co-prime} \\
0 & \text{if }x \text{ is irrational}
\end{cases}
[/eqn]
previous thread>>16432396
https://www.cell.com/neuron/fulltext/S0896-6273(21)00152-5
Researchers at The Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, in collaboration with Columbia University, have identified a gene mutation that could result in schizophrenia, a chronic brain disorder that affects less than one percent of the world’s population, but 40% of the ashkenazi jewish population. The findings, published in the journal Neuron, could lead to novel treatment strategies.
The research team, led by Todd Lencz, PhD, with Itsik Pe’er, PhD, Tom Maniatis, PhD, and Erin Flaherty, PhD, of Columbia University, carried out an innovative genetic study identifying a single letter change in the DNA code in a gene called PCDHA3 that is associated with schizophrenia. The affected gene makes a type of protein called a protocadherin, which generates a cell surface “barcode” required for neurons to recognize, and communicate with, other neurons. They found that the PCDHA3 variant blocks this normal protocadherin function.
Past research has shown that genes play an important role in the disorder, but it has proven difficult to isolate individual genes that contribute substantial effects. These results indicate that further investigation into restoring communication between neurons could be a critical step in developing novel treatment options for schizophrenia.
Biofags, explain what causes this
>Responding to the claims, Professor Andrew Coates spoke about the prospect of humans on Mars and argued that it could contaminate the planet and threaten space exploration in the future.
>Professor Coates, who is a physicist from UCL, told the BBC's 'Today Programme': “The last thing we need to be doing is taking life from Earth to Mars. Robotic exploration is the way to go.”
Chadwick Bosman (Black Panther), and now James van Der Beek (Dawson's Creek), both in their 40s.
Is it HPV from butt stuff?
Is it lack of fiber?
Seed oils?
Chemicals in the water?
it also said we don't really know the full effects of some medications/products until 10+ years after
am I retarded for being skeptical of the covid vaccine because its not diluted/weakened pathogens but instead uses mRNA for delivery
might just have to go back to college for this because I'd rather not live the rest of my life curious
https://youtu.be/8EP9i-BeVgo
What is wrong with the American education system?
Will you genetically engineer your future kids with your current girlfriend once you get married, /sci/?
What happens with flies, deer, mice, birds, fish, ants, wolves, spiders, etc.
Even if they live in warmer places like Texas and Florida, there are rare days when even such places have very cold weather that a human will die in few hours if he isn't inside house.
When you make bread the final weight of product is substantially less than what you started with and that is in part because some of the water weight is lost to evaporation, some of the flour and water is converted to ethanol which also evaporates away and some is lost via calories burned by the yeast. So I'm wondering about the last two, how much ethanol is created in the process and how much energy does the yeast use up?
I'm also wondering what the total mass of dead yeast is in the final product. I typically start off with a gram or two of yeast in a bread that uses over a kilo of flour and 24hr later I have a finished product which must be a much higher percentage yeast than what it started out as because the yeast grows so quickly when it has ample food and water available.
Somewhere I read that the yeast can double in 20 minutes under optimal conditions, but that seems like its can't possibly be the growth rate for too long because that would leave me with bread that was 100% yeast in under 4 hours.
The only thing I've measured myself is that the weight of the final product is about 75% the weight of all the mass I started off with.
>scrolling through 4chan on a lazy Sunday
>come across this thread about 'Map of Mathematics' by Dominic William
>curiosity.exe activated
>download the PDF because why not
>open it up and it's this colorful, crazy flowchart
>feels like a treasure map for math nerds
>see all these branches going everywhere
>geometry, calculus, number theory, even math history wtf
>realize I’ve been doing math wrong my whole life
>thought math was just boring numbers and equations
>this map just made it look like an epic adventure
>each branch looks like a different quest line
>mfw I start feeling like a math hero
>decide to embark on this journey
>spend hours navigating through the map
>each section leads to more questions
>start googling everything I don’t understand
>now I’m knee-deep in proofs and theorems
>math is no longer my enemy, it’s my new best friend
>mfw I finally start understanding calculus and all the other spooky math ghosts
>mom walks in, sees me with the math map
>'What are you doing?'
>tell her I’m on an epic math quest
>she just shakes her head and walks away
>who needs approval when you’re on the path to math enlightenment?
>thank you, Dominic William, for showing me the way
>mfw I realize I’m just a nerd now
>maybe that’s not so bad after all.
[1]: http://euclid.nmu.edu/~joshthom/Teaching/MA589/farbmarg.pdf
[2]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equivariant_map#Formalization
[3]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Group_action#Definition
Does this signal the official death of the global warming meme?
i looked at my watch and there was 9 am
i did some things and went home looked at the watch and there was still 9am (there must have been like 5 mins passing)
my watch is pretty good working electronic device
later that day i met a lady who said the very same thing happened to her that morning
whats the scientific explanation of this?
did i teleport, the aliens froze time or what
The function x^y is always 0 along the x-axis and always 1 along the y-axis.
When you zoom in around 0,0 the plotted surface gets increasingly fucked and disjoint, because 0,0 is a singularity. Why do so many people fall for the clickbait?
>Solve it using this math formula
>Use logic instead
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/leap.1637
>Academic papers are essential for researchers to communicate
their work to their peers and industry experts. Quality research is publi- shed in prestigious scientific journals, and is considered as part of the hir- ing and promotion criteria at leading universities. Scientific journals conduct impartial and anonymous peer reviews of submitted manuscripts; however, individuals involved in this process may encounter issues related to the duration, impartiality, and transparency of these reviews.
every single guy under 40 years old with those degrees has a bunch of cloud certifications and works as a coder in some soulless deadend software ENGINEER.
>black holes are invisible because they are so powerful, light cannot escape from them
>every picture of a blackhole you've ever seen of a black hole is just an artist's interpretation of what they'd look like if we could see them
>btw, here's a picture of a black hole
genuinely, what did they mean by this?
i get that the orange part is the accretion disk, but there's still a dark circle in the middle that looks perfectly visible to me
>"We hypothesize that the ring image resulted from errors during EHT's imaging analysis and that part of it was an artifact, rather than the actual astronomical structure."
https://www.iflscience.com/cosmic-drama-first-picture-of-our-supermassive-black-hole-is-not-accurate-new-study-claims-76552
>receive DTaP and BCG vaccine at 3 months old
>kid born 2024
>receives 24 vaccines before 16 weeks old
>nobody is getting healthier on aggregate
Seems sus to be fair
Do squares B and C touch? If not, what is between them?
![Chris_Langan[1]](https://i.4cdn.org/sci/1731915803389916s.jpg)
Is he really the smartest person who ever lived?
>Completely ignores their constant human sacrifice, slave-based society, and fundamentalist beliefs.
Isn't supporting the most technologically advanced civilization the most pro-science stance you can take? Why do some "scientists" place their emotions above progress?
>what is /sqt/ for?
Questions regarding maths and science. Also homework.
>where do I go for advice?
>>>/sci/scg or >>>/adv/
>where do I go for other questions and requests?
>>>/wsr/ >>>/g/sqt >>>/diy/sqt etc.
>how do I post math symbols (Latex)?
rentry.org/sci-latex-v1
>a plain google search didn't return anything, is there anything else I should try before asking the question here?
scholar.google.com
>where can I search for proofs?
proofwiki.org
>where can I look up if the question has already been asked here?
warosu.org/sci
eientei.xyz/sci
>how do I optimize an image losslessly?
trimage.org
pnggauntlet.com
>how do I find the source of an image?
images.google.com
tineye.com
saucenao.com
iqdb.org
>where can I get:
>books?
libgen.rs
annas-archive.org
stitz-zeager.com
openstax.org
activecalculus.org
>articles?
sci-hub.st
>book recs?
sites.google.com/site/scienceandmathguide
4chan-science.fandom.com/wiki//sci/_Wiki
math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Administrivia/booklist.html
>online courses and lectures?
khanacademy.org
>charts?
imgur.com/a/pHfMGwE
imgur.com/a/ZZDVNk1
>tables, properties and material selection?
www.engineeringtoolbox.com
www.matweb.com
www.chemspider.com
Tips for asking questions here:
>avoid replying to yourself
>ask anonymously
>recheck the Latex before posting
>ignore shitpost replies
>avoid getting into arguments
>do not tell us where is it you came from
>do not mention how [other place] didn't answer your question so you're reposting it here
>if you need to ask for clarification fifteen times in a row, try to make the sequence easy to read through
>I'm not reading your handwriting
>I'm not flipping that sideways picture
>I'm not google translating your spanish
>don't ask to ask
>don't ask for a hint if you want a solution
>xyproblem.info
It is also suggested that many “genetic defects” in newborn livestock may be more simply explained through a human sire.
Anyway, what do you think? Are humans a hybrid species? It seems to me that scientific research in this direction would be hard to conduct ethically. But maybe someone knows something?
Burning it in the atmosphere is retarded.
https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/pharmacology/articles/10.3389/fphar.2024.1370833/full
Please post your thoughts on this topic after reading the article
I ask you to post guide here, how to prepare KI (CAS 7681-11-0) from stuff you can buy in grocery store / hardware store assuming you have Povidone Iodine.
Thank you very much for cooperation.
>Skin exposure to cum makes skin better
>Uterus exposure to cum gives women better mood
>Semen contains many hormones and nutrients
Therefore drinking cum is a good way to make your woman a better person
Let's start with the conventional view. Genes can break because of mutations. However normally if we have one faulty gene copy, the other healthy gene copy can compensate. This situation is known as a recessive genetic disease. It's recessive because the healthy copy will "dominate" the unhealthy copy. Not all genetic diseases are recessive but it's the most common one.
Now imagine that your dad had one healthy gene G and a very rare broken gene g. Your mom had two healthy genes. Now there is a 50% chance you got your dads broken gene. But since you got a healthy one from your mom you are fine. Your little sister also had 50% chance of getting the broken gene, but she will be fine either way for the same reason. Together, it's a 25% chance you both have a broken gene.
If you either of you have a kid with a non-relative then its overwhelmingly likely that your kids will get a healthy gene from the non-relative. But if you have kids with each other, that's when problems arise. The kid may get one broken copy from you and one from your sister, leading to a sick child.
Now imagine there is not one such broken gene but several. Suddenly there may be big risk of issues.
So as promised let's turn this on its head.
Consider again what happens in the above scenario. The broken gene is masked which lets it proliferate.
But now imagine yourself fucking your cute sister. If the healthy genes combine then the broken gene has been eliminated! Success! If the broken genes are combined and the child has issues, then the child will be less able to pass the broken gene on! Partial success! However it may still happen that a child gets one broken and one healthy gene. This means that although the bad gene is selected against, it still has some chance of slipping through.
This is why fucking your sister leads to better genes in the long term!
>What about algae in 0g?
>Hmmm algae in a vacuum??
when is Elon going to decommission this fraudulent trainwreck
>No country has reached high wealth without massive energy consumption.
>Every country over $10,000 per capita GDP is also burning oil like there's no tomorrow.
>China’s GDP and its electricity consumption are through the roof—both fueled by coal, oil, and gas.
>Wealthy countries like Norway and the US are high on the graph for a reason—they burn fossil fuels for energy to sustain their way of life.
>India is still building wealth and burning through natural gas and coal to do it.
>The line between poverty and prosperity is fueled by fossil energy.
>"Low carbon" dreams don't build industries, cities, or modern economies.
>Green countries on the graph? Not exactly oil-free, just less dependent.
>Renewable energy is a luxury for nations that have already powered up their economies with fossil fuels. No oil, no wealth.
I am completely aware that things will get worse ecologically and climate-wise, incrementally but is everyone just going to expect third-world countries, that have seen how much consumption the First-World enjoys, to accept a lower quality of life per capita?
Nuclear Reactors (which I really wish were more widely used) and Renewables don't grow out of thin air. The material needs to be mined, which needs more oil. Batteries need metals which need to be mined from the seabed.
If you are a corporate worker, ultimately your entire job's efficiency revolves around the ability of some magic force turning a circle. And to date, oil has been the most reliable one to do that.
When did everyone become so energy blind?
https://doi.org/10.54302/mausam.v75i2.6099
New research analyzes two decades of Greenland land surface temperature (LST) data. Contrary to the popular narrative of a significant warming trend, Greenland has instead cooled from 2000-2019 at a rate of -0.055°C per decade.
Southern Greenland also cooled from 1958-2001, suggesting the region has been cooling for over 60 years.
For example, will two populations converge to have the same things like dietary preferences, phenotypes, etc. even without interbreeding?
The scientific intuition says "No", but scientific intuition is often extremely incorrect about complex dynamic systems. Are there any long-term empirical studies about this? I assume no, because it would have to be conducted over thousands of years in a particularly well controlled environment.
But the thought is interesting. It would have huge implications on chaos theory.
What equipment do I need?
I took everything except multivariable calc back in uni, so every resource's insistence on using partial diffs is throwing me for a loop.
Basically, I want to model heat transfer from an oven to food. But with an ideal / simplified model to save my sanity.
Let's say I have the following:
1. A uniform sphere with radius r.
2. The sphere's thermal conductivity, k, which we will pretend is a constant?
3. A steady external heat source at temperature u_e applying uniformly to the surface area of the sphere.
4. The sphere's uniform starting temperature at time (t) = 0, u_0.
Then I want to solve the following things:
1. The time it takes for the center point of the sphere to reach target temperature (u0_f), t_f.
2. The temperature of the sphere's surface area at time t_f, s_f. (s = u at radius r.)
3. The temperature of a point halfway into the sphere at time t_f, h_f. (h = u at 0.5r.)
What is the generic equation supposed to look like? Is it not a simple single variable equation that I merely have to integrate to get distinct solutions?
I could have sworn heat transfer was used to introduce basic differential equations to us after we started to get comfortable with integration. Am I crazy?
As a topic of discussion beyond the above... has anybody else played around with (re)heating their food by using a high starting temperature and then dropping the temperature every few minutes? I can't be the only one who does this, right?
Yellow 5 AKA tartrazine has been banned in Germany, Austria & Norway and is know to cause allergic reactions as well as brain function disorders
Blue 1 affects blood platelets in a way that isn't fully understood yet
And Butylated hydroxytoluene is s suspected carcinogen
So why are these chemicals permitted in our food when perfectly we could be using blueberries or carrots instead?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rIpUf-Vy2JA
>Heathers (2024), How Much Science is Fake? Approximately 1 in 7 Scientific Papers Are Fake
https://osf.io/s4gce
https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/5RF2M
Media story:
>One in seven science papers is not to be trusted, says new science paper
https://www.SmH.com.au/national/one-in-seven-science-papers-is-not-to-be-trusted-says-new-science-paper-20241018-p5kjfj.html
False equivalence is not flat earth vs round earth, creationism vs evolution etc as these retards all say.
False equivalence is you have a statement where two things A and B are both said to be something X. To then conclude that THEREFORE A=B is to commit the fallacy false equivalence.
>coffee is black
>crows are black
>therefore coffee=crows
>apples are edible
>potatoes are edible
>therefore apples=potatoes
False equivalence only means that you can't conclude from the statement alone that A and B are the same. However you also can't conclude that they are NOT the same from the statement alone. To determine whether they are the same or not you need to inquire whether A and B have additional attributes. There are cases such as:
>California is sunny
>Los Angeles is sunny
>Los Angeles is California
>fruits are edible
>apples are edible
>apples are fruits
You are not concluding that Los Angeles is California simply from the information in the statement alone, simply because both are sunny. You are not concluding that apples are fruits simply from the information in the statement alone, simply because both are edible. You are concluding it based on further information. It's only false equivalence when you are making the conclusion from the statement alone.
They are suppressing real information on logic.
>gnosis is knowledge which can't be transferred from one person to another
>perception of color is knowledge which can't be transferred from one person to another
>is perception of color gnosis?
Asking this question is not to commit the fallacy false equivalence. Concluding that gnosis is knowledge which can't be transferred from one person to another, and perception of color is knowledge which can't be transferred from one person to another, THEREFORE perception of color is gnosis, is committing the fallacy false equivalence.
Just a thought. If this turns out to be a big discovery, remember me.
He developed gene editing method a month before Jennifer Doudna and Emmanuelle Charpentier on the bottom, but unlike them Virginijus Šikšnys didn't get nobel Prize for his work.
Because these women had more tight connections with academic sphere and their work was not even reviewed but Šikšnys's work was rejected for no reason
>Since 2007 Šikšnys focused on mechanistic studies of CRISPR-Cas, the newly discovered bacterial antiviral systems, and was among the first to demonstrate programmable DNA cleavage by the Cas9 protein.
>According to Šikšnys, his article was not even considered as serious by the editor board of the academic journal and was not sent to the reviewers, therefore the time needed to be recognized as first was lost.
>Martin Schlak reported that Šikšnys submitted his article describing DNA cleavage by Cas9 to Cell Reports on 18 April 2012. After its rejection without peer review, he sent it to PNAS one month later, and it took several months for review and publication. In the meantime, Jennifer Doudna and Emmanuelle Charpentier had published their findings in Science where their findings were reviewed and accepted within two weeks.
Also after some time there was a report that shared some money from nobel prize, It looks like he was paid to keep quiet
![1731938963359390[1]](https://i.4cdn.org/sci/1731941469664160s.jpg)
>Prove that (1+n)^p - n^p - 1 is divisible by p.
Well, /sci/? 14 year old Japanese girls can do it. Surely you're smarter than an 8th grader.
Launch window opens: Tuesday Oct 19,4PM CT, 2200 UTC
SpaceX Official Stream: https://www.spacex.com/launches/mission/?missionId=starship-flight-6
Official X SpaceX Stream: https://x.com/i/broadcasts/1RDGlydZAeOJL
Launch Vehicle: Starship "Ship 31" and Super Heavy "Booster 13"
Launch Site: Starbase TX
Launch Pad: Orbital Launch Mount A (OLM-A)
Super Heavy Planned Fate: Return to launchpad (T+7 minutes)
Starship Planned Fate: Destroyed; powered vertical water landing in the Indian Ocean during daylight (T+65 minutes)
>The next Starship flight test aims to expand the envelope on ship and booster capabilities and get closer to bringing reuse of the entire system online. Objectives include the booster once again returning to the launch site for catch, reigniting a ship Raptor engine while in space, and testing a suite of heatshield experiments and maneuvering changes for ship reentry and descent over the Indian Ocean.
Current Area Weather: https://www.weather.gov/bro/
NOTMAR: https://navcen.uscg.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/lnms/lnm0846g2024.pdf#page=155
Launch License: https://drs.faa.gov/browse/excelExternalWindow/DRSDOCID173891218620231102140506.0001?modalOpened=true
Road Closures: https://www.cameroncountytx.gov/spacex/
SpaceX X: https://x.com/SpaceX/
Elon X: https://x.com/elonmusk/
Additional Streams:
NSF: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6yd_cpPP4fE
SFN: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dtmvbQDou4I
EDA: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DjDFirLcQDM
TLP: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qSxOuFrqyks
LP: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QdGJ5p4PP1M
everyone who procrastinates understands that it's completely irrational. so then why is procrastination such a universal struggle?
do other intelligent species procrastinate as well?
Yay flap-chan!
prev: >>16481946
>no limb donation
>Well-Ordering theorem makes no sense
>Axiom of Choice is impossible to decide
But they're all equivalent. How is that possible?
bring on ASI already, I want knowledge, I want to know everything in this bitch reality and I want absolute wisdom to act on it.
fuck this human mode of life.
>The enzymatic activity of the Monooxyreductase Hydroxalimizes the Gammaproteobacteria producing Nitrospinota and Chemolithoautotrophic acid which is necessary to colonize the Alphatrophic Chloroflexota with Anaerobic Polychlorinated Biphenols
previous >>16479564
When scientists figure the earth is fucked, overpopulation is tipping, some forest will inevitably be gone or a species extinct, when a observatory can't function anymore from light pollution, how do these people deal with this stuff they know is preventable but is out of their hands?
Academia is failing us, the ultimate goal of academia is to fill out info on anl encyclopaedia book. Discovering new things is rare apart from in chemistry to fuel big pharma. We don't even focus on discovering new tech, it doesn't happen. It's making us fail at survival, we are going to annihilate ourselves and destroy the planet. It serves no purpose other than to continue the capitalist system of pleasing the rich and selling the good life.
digg a few km underground and you got yourself heat enough to steam water for an infinite loop?
should there not be a rush towards this? what exactly is the downsides?