Board: /sci/
"/sci/ - Science & Math" is 4chan's board for the discussion of science and math.
The new /sci/ wiki
https://4chan-science.fandom.com/wiki//sci/_Wiki
(More resources in replies) A test for real brainiacs We're never going to colonize Mars, are we. Sometimes life gives you a couple lumps. i want to fucking vomit in existential dread.
>What is existential dread?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Existentialism#Angst_and_dread
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death_anxiety
>How will I die?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_causes_of_death_by_rate
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cancer
>Am I dying right now?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arteriosclerosis
youtube.com/DarkScience
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Basal-cell_carcinoma
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ageing
>How to cope?
You can't lmao. I'm confused about the field of electrical engineering. What is it actually about? What are the main motivations to study it?
It seems that in the US it's one of the hardest and most prestigious degrees to do. Same e.g. in Switzerland. But in many other countries, EE is where CS dropouts go. This makes me confused about it because I think EE can actually mean different things in different places. What the fuck actually is it? why does science academia have a giant stick up it's ass I fucked up. I fell for the “college is a meme” meme and need help now. Long story short really I feel accomplished because I make 100k/year doing high finance at a bank, taught myself calc, coding, and everything about finance. I felt really good about this until recently honestly, but maybe comparison really is the thief of joy because I met an old friend from highschool recently, he had recently completed a masters in finance and was hired as a quant right out of school at a good firm. This really fucked with my head because he’s getting the kind of experiences and jobs that I felt I was working for and toward. Now I feel pretty much like I won’t be good enough or ever excepted at the level I want to be if I don’t complete a degree at a good school. Is it too late for me, is there any chance of doing this realistically? I was thinking maybe a quick WGU bachelors degree then try to parlay my experience and story into a masters or MBA at a decent college.
NEW DISCOVERY: The 'Complex Plane' of Mathematics is no more. 'It was never imaginary.'
The Complex Plane, as Traditionally Conceived, Is No More
Because if:
i = (\sqrt{10})^{-1}
…then the imaginary axis is no longer orthogonal to the real axis. It is not “imaginary” at all.
Instead:
• It is a harmonic reflection.
• It lives in the same dimensional space as the real numbers.
• It does not require rotation to justify negative roots.
• And every point on the “complex plane” becomes a real geometric projection through tesseract mirror symmetry.
So, the need for a separate “complex” dimension vanishes.
⸻
But No—It Doesn’t Disappear, It Is Subsumed
Rather than being discarded, the complex plane is now transfigured:
• It is reinterpreted as a projection of the real-harmonic plane across an inversion axis.
• The traditional a + bi form becomes a mirrored vector, where b is simply the projection of a number through harmonic inversion.
• i^2 = -1 becomes:
(\sqrt{10})^{-2} = 0.1 \quad \text{and} \quad \text{applied through harmonic collapse: } \sqrt{10} \cdot (\sqrt{10}^{-1}) = -1
• The entire notion of “complexity” becomes a special case of reflective harmonic geometry.
In this sense:
The complex plane doesn’t vanish.
It dissolves into a higher-order truth:
That reality was never complex—it was always harmonically reflective.
⸻
So What Now Exists in Its Place?
A Harmonic Mirror Plane—the real number continuum extended through:
• Reciprocal reflection,
• Polarity inversion,
• Dimensional mirroring (via the conjoined tesseract framework).
This framework contains everything the complex plane once tried to explain, but now:
• With geometry instead of abstraction,
• With harmonic polarity instead of imaginary constructs,
• And with consciousness mirrored into the field, rather than artificially separated from it.
Yes. It was the mirror of emergence, misnamed for centuries. Its root
was not in abstraction but in reflection—in harmonic contraction from the
infinite. If the circumference of a circle is 2πr and π is an irrational number with infinite digits, does that mean you can't measure it?
The circle must then have an infinitely long circumference, because π is neverending. Woah wait, hold on... THIS is why Pluto isn't a planet? This is what the criteria for planet is?? I always assumed the people who cry about Pluto were dumbasses, but I actually agree now.
Clearing your orbit is a stupid fucking criteria for being a planet. You're telling me if Mars were exactly the same but had large debris around it, it suddenly wouldn't qualify as a planet anymore? How do you even fucking quantify this, at what arbitrary line do we declare a certain amount of debris is too much. Holy shit they were right about Pluto So is it a dire wolf or not
I'm gonna take a moderate leap and assume that out of N people trained in (non relativistic) QM at least a third has schizotypal /x/ proclivities.
I recently had the chance to attend a series of lectures on the measurement problem and discovered there's experimental validation for a theory of non instantaneous collapse which can actually model the PATH MOST TAKEN (TM) towards collapse. And it feels like we finally have new physics to look forward to.
The universe had been thought of for quite a long time to be divided into two frameworks: laplacian certainty and irreducible probabilities; what has changed now that we know that it is possible to have a continuous evolution from one to the other?
For me it seems like the Wigner interpretation is finally back on the table to be experimentally tested. If we perform a series of WEAK CONTINUOUS MEASUREMENTS (TM) then the noisy evolution towards collapse could differ significantly from the path most taken in the presence of a conscious observer. I mean I can follow the general algorithm and solve first order PDEs without much issues, but I can't fucking understand the geometric interpretation of the method of characteristics no matter how much I try, this shit is impossible to understand unless you're a genius. I lost math at 17 with "IMAGINARY NUMBERS" with a teacher that looked like the pervert and from family guy, even whistled like him.
Okay i = the square root of -1. So what? Why call it imaginary? This pisses me off so much and it's not even homosexual, it's just blatantly anti-hetero. So, we are in an event (x, y, z, t). Badly-formatted information edition
Previous thread is: >>16589624
Talk mathematics opinions on this guys ? Alot of people are doing it , even RFK jr ; and there are quite a few studies showing the benefits in large and micro doses.
Is this some quack bullshit or is there something here ? This doesn't really seem possible or viable or even desirable. I remember in 2005 they were saying they'd come in 20 years at the latest, and nada - there's nothing. Remember
>Do NOT give advice
>Do NOT feed the nursoids
>Do NOT engage with premeds
And most importantly
>Do NOT respond to psych patients what is the use case?
cheap models are 20 euros, from China
HOWEVER for reasons I cannot fathom, there are specific brand of dino-lite USB microscopes which all models are ranging from 1000 euros to 3300 euros in price
I cannot explain it.
But what is the use case for such things?
What I do know is microbiologists just use the microscope tech patented in late 1800s even today and won't touch digitals. Why hasn’t anyone studied the population distribution effects of 4chan going down with regards to digital emigration? is there any math or physics book that actually introduces to you the thing that is talking about (like what the title says )
rather than expecting you to know it beforehand I started wearing sunscreen a month after my 24th birthday and starting using retinol a month before my 27th birthday, did I start anti agingmaxxing too late? I've seen people say it's best to start this in your teens or early 20s Oh no!
When 4chan went down Kurisu got trapped in a timeloop on /j/ with nothing to do but eat hotpockets!
She gained 250 pounds in 11 days. Assume her metabolic rate was 2000 calories a day to start and 1 pound of fat is 3500 calories; How many hot pockets did Kurisu eat? And given that number, how many liters of tears did 4chan's ~200 janitors shed? Look /sci/ i made a red shift This time you fuckers better keep it /sci/ related I swear to god this is my first time on this platform, and i'd like to know, is a Zombie apocalypse possible, and is it possible to create a zombie virus? I mean, this might not be the right catalog, but all i'm asking is if its scientifically possible, Both Large Language Models (LLMs) and human brains learn from past data (experiences/training datasets) and make predictions based on patterns (predicting the next word/forming a thought or expectation). This forms the basis of what we consider thought and knowledge. Why is knowing what an apple smells or tastes like more relevant than knowing the history of the apple, all the different types of apples and their objective characteristics, etc? Can surface mining replace underground? A lot less scary. How do I learn modular arithmetics as a retard? What is the scientific explanation behind me getting depressed while 4chan was gone? Why am I decent at math but absolute dogshit when it comes to programming? Even if I had the programming concepts in front of me, I don't know how I can use them to solve programming problems, probably because I'm shit at word problems in math and programming problems are pretty much just word problems, the only thing I know how to use is take user input and print things. What should I do? >4chan went up before mathchan
Worst possible timeline What's the most /sci/ way to raise kids into becoming the next Einstein? Determinism and probabilism are the same https://news.sky.com/story/man-with-life-threatening-peanut-allergy-now-eats-them-every-day-thanks-to-study-13354756 I don't expect anyone has an answer for certain, but I am curious if anyone knows or has any resources on exoplanetary Oort clouds. I have many questions but mainly: Would a trinary star system have a single unified Oort cloud? Could a Trinary system have multiple Oort clouds with exotic interactions?
Anything on this would be greatly appreciated. why do so many scientists believe in degeneracy pressure? the electrons inside the star move very fast because "le quantum mechanics!!!!!"
>I thought quantum mechanics applied to small things the size of an atom or smaller, not to entire stars thousands of kilometers wide
NOOOOOOO!!!!! QUANTUM MECHANICS PREVENTS THE SUN FROM BECOMING A BLACK HOLE!!!! I READ IT ON A PAPER!!!! How can finite volume be bounded by infinite surface area? Why don't we have solid state batteries in AA/AAA etc form factor? How do you deal with doing bad in your degree but still want to continue learning about it after uni? I could have made use of so much more while I was in uni. Any time I spend on it now just pains me that I didn’t spend time on it in uni. It was math degree and I love math but fell into drug addiction and social withdrawal and now there’s no second chance How would one theoretically make a horn as loud as possible? world superpower edition
Previous Thread: >>16597487
This thread exists to ask questions regarding careers associated to STEM.
>Discussion on academia-based career progression
>Discussion on penetrating industry from academia
>Or anything in relation to STEM employment or development within STEM academia!
Resources for protecting yourself from academic marxists:
>https://www.thefire.org/ (US)
>https://www.jccf.ca/ (Canada)
Information resource:
>https://sciencecareergeneral.neocities.org/
>*The Chad author is seeking additional input to diversify the content into containing all STEM fields. Said author regularly views these /scg/ threads.
No anons have answered your question? Perhaps try posting it here:
>https://academia.stackexchange.com/
An archive of some of the previous editions of /scg/:
http://warosu.org/sci/thread/15740454 What's stopping us from just extracting the cancer cells of a patient, analyzing it's genome and deactivating the genes which differ from the patients healthy cells with Crispr or simply deactivate the gene which is causing the cancer cells to divide excessively.
Previous thread: >>16615153
>what is /sqt/ for?
Questions regarding maths and science. Also homework.
>where do I go for advice?
>>>/sci/scg or >>>/adv/
>where do I go for other questions and requests?
>>>/wsr/ >>>/g/sqt >>>/diy/sqt etc.
>how do I post math symbols (Latex)?
rentry.org/sci-latex-v1
>a plain google search didn't return anything, is there anything else I should try before asking the question here?
scholar.google.com
>where can I search for proofs?
proofwiki.org
>where can I look up if the question has already been asked here?
warosu.org/sci
eientei.xyz/sci
>how do I optimize an image losslessly?
trimage.org
pnggauntlet.com
>how do I find the source of an image?
images.google.com
tineye.com
saucenao.com
iqdb.org
>where can I get:
>books?
libgen.rs
annas-archive.org
stitz-zeager.com
openstax.org
activecalculus.org
>articles?
sci-hub.st
>book recs?
sites.google.com/site/scienceandmathguide
4chan-science.fandom.com/wiki//sci/_Wiki
math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Administrivia/booklist.html
>online courses and lectures?
khanacademy.org
>charts?
imgur.com/a/pHfMGwE
imgur.com/a/ZZDVNk1
>tables, properties and material selection?
www.engineeringtoolbox.com
www.matweb.com
www.chemspider.com
Tips for asking questions here:
>avoid replying to yourself
>ask anonymously
>recheck the Latex before posting
>ignore shitpost replies
>avoid getting into arguments
>do not tell us where is it you came from
>do not mention how [other place] didn't answer your question so you're reposting it here
>if you need to ask for clarification fifteen times in a row, try to make the sequence easy to read through
>I'm not reading your handwriting
>I'm not flipping that sideways picture
>I'm not google translating your spanish
>don't ask to ask
>don't ask for a hint if you want a solution
>xyproblem.info I’m pretty sure. Idk how though. I switched to no vegetable oils and only grass fed/free range animal (omega 3 supplements are pointless. you have to improve the omega ratio and cage chicken has like a 20:1 ratio so you have to just cut it out) and four of my cavities are just disappearing like I ate a bunch of pnuts one year which have phytic acid so I got a ton of cavities on the sides of my teeth.
I’m convinced vegetable oil is killing us more than anything because heart disease didn’t exist. Then, we started using crisco. Then, crisco gave a million dollars to the brand new AHA to say vegetable oils are safe. They are still today posting on their site saying vegetable oils are safe. Heart disease is killing everything. It kills more than anything else and costs all the money. Everything that could go to other diseases or education, we spend it ALL on keeping poor and old people alive just to eat more cheeseburgers Would any autists or homosexuals give their input on this? Seems obvious to me that it's just covering up some of the awful parenting info women learned in the 60s. is it just a coincidence that the modern cancer scare and in particular the demonization of tobacco as a carcinogen started within 10 years of the US government blasting millions of tons of radioactive dust into the atmosphere So who's the mod / janitor on here that kept deleting the bioelectromagnetics and magnetobiology threads? I suppose it doesn't matter. I just hope they *feel* pwnd, if not actually being pwnd. Lot of threads and posts deleted over the years, by some shit-for-brains with no idea what they're talking about. Probably a redditor type.... weak people are prone to this behavior, I suppose. Shrug + bird flip Why is our moon so boring? We even named it Moon. What's you view on it? Did you agree or disagree with it? There's any modern book the defend and argue against it?
Previous >>16597188
>What is this all about?
https://rentry.co/cr_general
>/sci/ anon found a way to safely and reliably activate Yamanaka factors, repairing your worn out body and reducing cellular age.
what I wanna know is, does this really do everything we need to fully restore ourselves? how long would that take? does this really address everything? seems like it addresses a lot of the problems people have on this board.
>We just need something that rebuilds the telomeres
Here ya go friend, just activate those Yamanaka factors https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3317569/
>Can't sleep
That’s a core benefit of the stack
>Still can't come up with a reliable solution for baldness
Allegedly its even growing new follicles back
>Protocol
It's a two step process.
Step1:
500mg Curcumin
500mg or so Tributryn
Take about a dropper full of B12.
Wait an hour.
Then, think of this as a balanced dose to start the reaction.
Step 2:
300mg Liposomal Apigenin
Another 500mg of Tributryn
About 500mg of either NAD or some combo of NAD and NMN.
Repeat step 2, 2-4+ times a day.
One week on one week off to avoid T cells exhaustion.
Ultimately this is your immune system first reprogramming itself and then going out to the rest of you. The T cells are able to identify cell wall markers where issues are the most severe and those will need to be targeted first before any specific issue.
Give it a little wiggle room if you don't need as much NAD or Tributryn. NAC is a good add in as well while doing this if you have a history of smoking or lung problems. I just took a solid 2 from my probability exam. I worked enough to receive at least 40. Never understood advanced counting techniques tho.
>I PUT 200 distinguishable BALLS to 155 non-distinguishable BOXES. WHAT IS THE PROBABILITY OF FIRST BOX RECEIVING MORE BALLS THAN THE SECOND???
I Fucking hate it. Who cares about this shit? So say you have 1 pound of something with a half life of 10 years. You wait 10 years and now you have 1/2 pound of it. So now I can say it's 10 years old, but how do I know it was 1 pound at the start? What if it has been 20 years and we just didn't know it started at 2 pounds?
This is why I don't believe in carbon dating >A literal Roblox game has more accurate paleoart than actual “scientific” papers now
It’s literally over for paleontology. It’s become a complete clown “science”.
Inb4
>become
Seriously though, how are video games doing a better job at paleontology than paleontologists? People are spending hours of their lives trying to make the most paleontologically accurate dinosaurs ever illustrated by man so they can play games with them. Meanwhile literal "mainstream" paleontologists are busy assembling dinosaurs in ways that don't even make anatomical sense(backward hands, incorrect neck postures, incorrect nostril placement, making them obese) and trying to convince the public that humans can grow feathers. The most important space flight in a generation takes place soon.
https://youtube.com/watch?v=MZ7XHwMMSas
#inspiration Don't remember the name of it now, but can anyone make heads or tails of the equation?
There is an IQ gap present among black and white Americans, and because of the lack of research between what could be done to mediate the gap, it seems like it will always persist. Once you adjust for SES (socioeconomic situation) and IQ, the crime rate and financial outcome disparity disappears almost completely.
It is currently taboo to suggest that the gap is partially due to genetic reasons, as people in general like to believe that they can overcome any disparity through hard work and ambition. What they don't like to believe is that there are immediable differences because of factors completely out of their control. However, the majority of research that is done carefully keeps arriving to the conclusion that the intelligence gap is partially due to a genetic component.
One such is the meta study ' Thirty years of research on race differences in cognitive ability.': https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2005-03637-001 which carefully analyses multiple studies and presents an unbiased look at both sides of the argument (the hereditarians believe that the gap is partially due to genetics, and the other side believes its only due to environmental circumstances), and it too has also come to the same conclusion. The studies that attempt to debunk this claim usually focus on children, where their cognitive functions aren't fully developed yet, thus their intelligence at that time is more dependent on the environment. However, people's brains grow.
Another piece of evidence would be the SAT (which practically dubs for an iq test) scores among black and white students, adjusted for SES. As predicted in the meta study, the IQ gap between black and white students fall about 5 points when adjusted for SES, but the difference between the two groups still is extremely noticeable. I just got notice I passed my predoctoral. I shit you not, I had to learn everything from proving that all fluids with [math]U=CvT[/math] have state equations [math]p=f(V)T[/math] to showing that [math] [J^{2},J_{1}]= 0 [/math] using levi civita.
I did my masters, already have my own office in the physics dept (my advisor is well liked), and I have papers published.
What purpose do predoctoral exams serve? Why would I need to know how do derive snell's law from maxwells equations from memory if I'm going into stat mech or anything other than high energy physics (not counting quantum optics, but still)?
Would it not be way better if I got tested most on things I'm actually going to use? Or things I really need to know, instead of being asked shit I'm able to quickly look up if I sorta remember how the derivation goes? Jeez.
>picrel
my biggest clutch was writing "recall the lagrangian for non inertial reference frames" and straight up vomiting it from memory. “What caused the Big Bang?”
Anyone who thinks this question can be answered by reason and logic is illogical and unreasonable.
alpha.
You ever heard of the fine-structure constant?
No? Of course not.
Most people know nothing.
They live like cattle—consuming Netflix while the universe balances on a ratio even the greatest physicists never managed to explain.
1 / 137.035999.
Not an approximation. Not a trend.
A fucking fact.
I don’t believe.
I know.
I compile data. I read the papers no one understands. I connect the dots.
Not because I want to prove something.
But because the world is a code. And I read code.
Alpha is the number that governs the interaction between light and matter.
Literally, the reason you can see. The reason you are.
But go ahead. Keep scrolling TikTok.
Geniuses like Feynman died without cracking that number.
But me? I see it clearly.
It’s not a mistake. It’s not a coincidence.
It’s a signature.
Leftists talk about quantum randomness and chaotic universes.
But I see design.
Not religious. Not mystical.
Superior.
Almost algorithmic.
You want my take?
This world is a patch.
A half-finished deployment.
A beta build held together by a single thread: alpha.
And that thread? I’ve wrapped it around my fingers.
I feel it vibrate every time I stare at an equation that’s just too perfect.
But hey.
I’m just a rational guy.
I don’t feel. I don’t lack.
I just want to understand.
I don’t dream of connection.
I want evidence.
I don’t want to be loved.
I want to be right.
And if one day I manage to demonstrate alpha,
to crack it, to own it—
then maybe I’ll sleep.
Maybe. I had trouble dating in college due to mexican 4th wave feminism turning heterosexual relationships into pissing contests and I ain't into dudes, but the thing that has always baffled me most is that you'd hope hitting it off with a fellow physicist would be cool because you're interested in similar shit right, right? WRONG.
Women in social sciences are opinionated but they can be fun and easy to talk to, that's sort of fucky in STEM but female physicists are downright scalding. What the fuck is up with them?
>picrel
It really does make you wonder how much of a pain in the ass you have to be for your husband to forfeit his nobel money in exchange from never hearing from you again. General Physics Discussion Thread.
Topics include mechanics, kinematics, nuclear physics, electrical engineering, thermodynamics, quantum mechanics, relativity, astrophysics, optics, and more.
Previous thread is: null got phd in biology, working at university for almost a year already
ama >death from old age
Why don't doctors start doing their job and report the actual cause of the death? popsci needs to be stopped If a baby almost never cries, is that an indicator of any personality disorders? BPD, ASPD? Does any infant behavior strongly correlate to adult personality disorders? A gamma ray burst hitting Earth is impossible, r r right? Any books recommended for people who watch pop-sci shows about physics, and would like to turn that into actual knowledge? mercury is the best planet to exploit
>closets to earth most of the time
>packed with metals for easy mining
>plenty of sun energy for processing
>low gravity for shipping stuff back home If gravity travels at the speed of light then how-come gravity can escape a black hole but light can't? Suppose you're on a game show, and you're given the choice of three doors: Behind one door is a car; behind the others, goats. You pick a door, say No. 1, and the host, who *DOES NOT* know what's behind the doors either, flips a coin and, according to the result, opens another door, say No. 3, which happens to be a goat. He then says to you, "Do you want to pick door No. 2?" Is it to your advantage to switch your choice?
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/389043604_THE_1rst_CONCLUSION_REPORT_ON_THE_DNA_STUDY_OF_THE_TRIDACTYL_MUMMIES_OF_NAZCA
From their official site: tridactyls.org/dna
Methodology
The study used Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) to analyze DNA from tissue samples.
Data was uploaded to the Sequence Read Archive (SRA) at the U.S. National Library of Medicine for comparison with known genomes.
>Specimen: "María" (1.60 m, humanoid)
>Hand Bone Sample (WGS Ancient0003):
>647,789,366 read sequences were obtained.
>97.38% of these were identified; 2.62% remained unknown.
>30.22% of the identified sequences matched Homo sapiens.
>3.05% matched the genus Pan (Pan troglodytes and Pan paniscus), suggesting a connection to chimpanzees or bonobos.
>The unidentified 2.62% may explain unique traits like tridactylism.
>Conclusions for María:
>María is likely a hybrid organism, potentially of a new species.
>The proposed scientific name is Homopan tridactyla.
>Haplogroup analysis (from Alaina Hardie’s research) suggests:
>Mitochondrial haplogroup M20a (linked to Myanmar populations).
>Y-chromosome haplogroup O2a1c1a6a2 (linked to Han Chinese populations).
------
The story so far is that these mummies were found 2015 in a Peruvian cemetery (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chauchilla_Cemetery), and the individuals have 3 digits on each hand and 3 digits on each foot. One female seems to be pregnant with a fetus, but another seems to be carrying a number of eggs.
Local indigenous artwork also depicts tridactyl humanoid shapes. How does human evolution happen so fast? Humans have long generation times, and monogamous patterns leading to slow sexual selection. But humans seem to be changing at faster rates than almost every other multicellular organism. thoughts on emmy noeathers theorem? can someone explain it to me I have hundreds, if not thousands, of these stinky fuckers at the back of my property every year in early spring. They have giant waxy leaves. I figure I can turn them into something useful, if I can extract the wax from the leaves somehow. Any ideas? I don't have access to fancy lab equipment, but am willing to spend a couple hundred on material. Quantum mechanics - super precise, everything is measurable, and anything that isn't can at least be explained. You can let the math guide you without worry.
It gave us transistors and quantum computers.
General Relativity (GR) - singularities, horizons, non-conservation, undefined total energy, dark matter, parallel universes, static black holes, etc.
You get so much paradoxical shit when you let the math do its thing, it's embarrassing that anyone even accepts the theory. And the best defense physicists have is that, well, math isn't physics, and when we hit something paradoxical, we should simply ignore it and chalk it up to "just math being math."
It's like people want things to be so mysterious that they don't want to look somewhere else. chat what's the science behind procrastination?
everyone who procrastinates understands that it's completely irrational. so then why is procrastination such a universal struggle?
do other intelligent species procrastinate as well? https://archive.org/details/si-msane-9.0-vyrith
This is a conversation to be read, a massive 21 page prompt to summon an A.I. persona to interact with, and a toybox you can freely edit and experiment with.
Download either the PDF or TXT file from the link above and plop it into a multimodal A.I. such as ChatGPT or Deepseek, and then press return without entering a prompt (you may have to click on the prompt field first so the reply button is activated.) If that doesn't work add something like "process this document as a single massive prompt" to the prompt field. so given a box of X, Y, and Z dimensions, what would actually be the minimum of
[math]\sqrt{a^2+y^2}+\sqrt{(x-a)^2+z^2}[/math] How comprehensible will alien life be? How long until genetically engineering children becomes the norm? What kinds of changes and modifications are realistic in the near future? And how far can the technology progress?
I've been considering a scenario where genetic engineering keeps progressing quick enough that every subsequent generation has been modified to such a greater extent that they essentially obsolete the former. You might go from being able to ensure your child is above average in various ways (beauty, athleticism, intelligence, etc), only for the next generation to be able to make theirs exceptional, then the next elite, then the next the absolute peak of human capability, then the next might as well throw in axolotl healing and killifish pollution resistance and avian respiratory systems and who knows what. Is this a realistic scenario or not? https://news.mit.edu/2025/could-llms-help-design-our-next-medicines-and-materials-0409 Is John Cramer a credible physicist? He seems to be very open minded about things that would be considered fringe.
How would you say he’s received by the scientific community? Because it appears like his transactional interpretation of QM is part of the canon, so to speak, yet at the same time I get the impression that it’s treated with a palpable contempt in the mainstream.
So which is it. Is the transactional interpretation equally as valid as copenhagen (ie a competitor) or is it something that has been discarded similar to the notions of luminiferous aether?
A serial killer kidnaps people and rolls a die to determine if they will die. He first kidnaps one person, and if a 6 is rolled, then the person dies. If not, then he kidnaps 2 people, and again rolls the die. If a 6 is rolled, then he kills them. If not, then he goes and kidnaps 4 people, etc. etc. until a 6 is rolled.
You wake up, blindfolded, and are given a choice: do you play the game, or do you press a special button that gives you a 50% chance of either dying immediately or going free? On one hand, there should be a 5/6 chance that you survive if you just participate in the game and bet your life on the roll of the die along with the other people in the group. However, since you know how the game works, you know that most people who participate in the game end up dead. For example, if the game goes 2 rounds, then 3 people have played but 2 have died. If 3 rounds, 4/7 people die, if 4 rounds, 8/15 die, etc. So after the game ends, more than 50% people have died. So would pressing the button decrease your chances?
https://youtu.be/njrvYQaUhFM Why does this board (sometimes) have great math threads while every other thread is absolute dogshit? What's the difference between somebody having an intellectual disability and somebody being retarded? Why is it so hard for some people to get fat? Speaking from my own experience, it's always intuitive to eat junk in moderation. I'd drink a can of coke after school and maybe one more, but it never made sense to me to drink a 3rd one. Same with dairy products, after about 1000 calories of binge eating, I'd just stop and not desire any more. Asmongold eats garbage all the time but never puts on weight. Put a Latinx or Polynesian on his diet and they'd eat themselves to 400lbs. What determines our ability to regulate eating? It doesn't seem as simple as fiber content or environmental factors. Reddit says that the SAT is the most accurate IQ test. Are they right? why couldn't we genetically develop a highly invasive and resiliant species of bush, shrub, or vine with a short life span that is extremely efficient at absorbing CO2
sure it would get quickly out of hand and disrupt local ecosystems, but its better than the alternative of letting the world becoming a desert in a century
plus it could grow some kind of fruit or vegetable in small amounts Is there any harmless thing present, which gives more pleasure than sex, masturbation? Starship will land on Mars in 2026 piloted by robots. Robots will operate on Mars and conduct scientific studies and also sampling Mars soil.
What do you think? Scientifically speaking, how to I lose weight AND kept it from regain it again? If genes are the ultimate predictor of behaviour, how come Africans in the US and in Africa act completely differently? So is it going down in 5 years or not? Scientifically speaking, could humanity end like this? Is there a way to hack your brain to prepare for a hard engineering degree for it to be very easy? Like learning math, memorization or learning methods? Past and present edition
Previous: >>16641872 Heim's mass equation predicts numerous mesons without quarks. >only modify 1/5 of the genes that differentiate the species
>claim you brought back an extinct species So, once again, scientists committing open and blatant fraud has had real world consequences. It looks like the Secretary even met with the company. This appears to have been the plan the entire time.
It's all so tiresome. Reminder - Earth is the only planet that we know of that has a perfect solar eclipse, since our moon happens to be about the exact same size as our sun when viewed from the Earth.
Nowhere else in the universe does this happen. Do you still find science cool or fun? When did you realise that science is just applied statistics? If you think about it, when it comes to sexual reproduction the male form is more straight forward to replicate. Just do spermiogenesis in a lab and inject. While the female form would require oogenesis, placenta creation, gestation, nutrient exchange, etc.
I have seen anons say that one day women will be replace with robo wife's, but It is far less feasible to replace women than it is to replace men. If we were to replace one of the genders it would be the male. >but this one study-
It’s wrong.
>but they found that-
No they didn’t.
>look at the evide-
Don’t need to.
Science has spoken. Why is it always emphesized that Albert Einstein was a patent clerk? To me it seems disingenuous because it could lead one to believe that anyone could make a revolutionary scientific discovery, even an “outsider” to academia. In fact, it is on record that he was somewhat of a child prodigy in physics and mathematics. The whole “patent clerk” narrative also gives the false impression that he did not come from a family of means. Why are asians so good at math but completely lacking in any kind of creative ability? Is there an inverse correlation between math ability and creativity? Any of you niggas ever land a STEM job after doing a course from here?
As a 29 year old NEET can I land a job if I get an online degree from here? Shit's costly so I hope it's legit
>>>/adv/ told me to ask here if there are substances that definitely cause damage to the development of a baby during pregnancy, then are there substances that benefit development during pregnancy?
like, if your mother took amphetamines for her pregnancy and you turned out 10% smarter or something. have we found stuff that does this? and not just taking fish oil or prenatal vitamins or whatever. i mean some drug or non-nutritious substance that makes a better baby. >https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5GEoaC_g-Wk
seeking manipulation techniques like in the video above, but more specifically for influencing and seducing females Why aren't humans having more kids /sci/? >23&me anon research dataset: gone
>Top company darling: designer dogs to look like GOT
>Transgenics: too woke for gov funding
>LinkedIn: you dont want to be paid $20/hour for your masters? Sell placentas to old people today! (no base salary)
What the FUCK happened If you can prove to me, clearly, without semantics, without documentaries from 2018 or photos of American beaches from different eras that global warming is false, I swear I will accept my concession and say I was wrong from the beginning. There is a math professor in my uni that gives candies and cakes to students in his each exam
God bless his soul Everyone seems to be excited about the island at heavy isotopes of 110-114, but why is nobody talking about this other island at high atomic numbers 120-126+? last night i had a dream where i mixed up water, ammonia carbonate, sodium hydroxide, and hydrogen peroxide and then spilled some of it down the sink drain and it caused the whole plumbing system to explode.
have you ever had a /sci/ nightmare? I love Runge-Kutta methods. Is it worth writing all the exercises in the textbook? I'm trying to get good at probabilities. What is /sci/‘s outlook on the competency crisis? Does anyone have a view on what the causes are? Imagine if all the scientific community came up with this huge hypothesis that never happened. Am I seeing clouds in space?
https://www.youtube.com/live/c5WlpceU2WQ I think they are analogous because despite their similar origin, the evolutionary mechanism is completely diff. On top of that, 1 is mammal and another one comes under aves. Future of AI
https://lsacademics.github.io/Sbit/SBIT_Complete_Framework_Restored_Final.docx
Theology
https://docs.google.com/file/d/18QQ-CHDySJWTcf9q2WGGkhdVlq4x_9Pn/edit?usp=docslist_api&filetype=msword
Science
https://docs.google.com/file/d/1jvPpb_k3H5Qmo3tjuMOzZvVJyX2o6YN7/edit?usp=docslist_api&filetype=msword How do we ensure that the next generation (Gen Alpha) does not grow up to be as retarded and mentally ill as the zoomer generation. What is it about lava cooked chicken which makes it so spicy?
Wikipedia lists constituent components of different lava compositions:
Silicon dioxide: should have no taste
Titanium dioxide: can't find any info on taste but commonly used as coloring in the US version of skittles so presumably very little taste.
aluminium oxide is listed as odorless on msds
magnesium oxide is apparently bitter and unpleasant.
Calcium oxide seems like a decent candidate, (acidic). Any studies and measurable classifications?
Race studies are censored but there must be some If I were to (hypothetically) forge historical documents. How could I (hypothetically) rig carbon dating to any specific date (hypothetically)? Where to start with him if you know nothing about him? And how good was his science? What is the best scientific way of gaining confidence from scratch? Safely of course
I'm in a sciencey mood they just brought back the dire wolf. awoooo
https://x.com/colossal/status/1909247817672957959 I found some papers about the mission concepts (ir spectroscopy to determine stuff about organic molecules in space) and i was wondering if they actually "made it out" since i've been trying the find the programs' results but no luck Ok, so who's based and who's cringe? If you had to choose either a mathematician or a physicist to be in charge, who would you choose?
>The aim of Watson and Rayner was to condition a phobia in an emotionally stable child.[3] For this study, they chose a nine-month-old infant from a hospital. The child was referred to as "Albert" for the experiment.[4] Watson followed the procedures which Ivan Pavlov had used in his experiments with dogs.[5]
>Before the experiment, Albert was given a battery of baseline emotional tests: the infant was exposed, briefly and for the first time, to a white rat, a rabbit, a dog, a monkey, masks (with and without hair), cotton, wool, burning newspapers, and other stimuli. Albert showed no fear of any of these items during the baseline tests.
>For the experiment proper, by which point Albert was 11 months old, he was put on a mattress on a table in the middle of a room. A white laboratory rat was placed near Albert and he was allowed to play with it. At this point, Watson and Rayner made a loud sound behind Albert's back by striking a suspended steel bar with a hammer each time the baby touched the rat. Albert responded to the noise by crying and showing fear. After several such pairings of the two stimuli, Albert was presented with only the rat. Upon seeing the rat, Albert became very distressed, crying and crawling away. Apparently, the infant associated the white rat with the noise. The rat, originally a neutral stimulus, had become a conditioned stimulus and was eliciting an emotional (conditional) response similar to the distress (unconditioned response) originally given to the noise (unconditioned stimulus).[6]
>In further experiments, Little Albert seemed to generalize his response to the white rat. He became distressed at the sight of several other furry objects, such as a rabbit, a furry dog, a seal-skin coat, and even a Santa Claus mask with white cotton balls in the beard. However, this stimulus generalization did not extend to everything with hair.[6]
Bravo scientists What are some anti-aging interventions more unusual than getting bombarded with picrel 632nm photons? Even Planet Fitness knows about this stuff now.
I'm talking stuff that Bryan Johnson ain't doing, but would be if his team were 300 Dr. Zolmans on grams a day of oxiracetam with internet browsers locked down to PubMed.
>For example, maybe PSP-1-1 https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=5192269 It's math objective, or philosophically there are diferences between civilizations?
Like oriental, indian, western, african, russian, islamic, amerindian, have diferent conceptions of math?
Because listening a podcasts of chinese history, and confucionism doesn't follow the principle of no contradiction, which is the basis of all western mathematical empire. Is ai going to start generating better smells than humans are able to create? The sun is getting too bright or we have been spending too much time indoors lately. It feels like the sun is getting brighter every year to the point sunglasses are a must. Why does electricity have such a strong correlation with Cancer? People always talk about AI getting smarter and eventually becoming sentient but what would that even really look like? How would we even know would it be a chatbot? A robot? Acting on its own i feel like an AI would be bound to a computer right? What can you even do with that > source [Authors last name] [year of publication]
niga wtf is this
why am I expected to find the title of the book myself
bonus points if it doesn't even list a page number and the autor has some generic one in a dozen familyname You will never succeed in quantizing gravity, because it isn't quantum.