Board: /sci/
"/sci/ - Science & Math" is 4chan's board for the discussion of science and math.
The new /sci/ wiki
https://4chan-science.fandom.com/wiki//sci/_Wiki
(More resources in replies) Square Kilometre Array will find aliens - Edition
https://arxiv.org/abs/1412.4867
previous: >>16688952 >The cause of Chronic Prostatitis is unknown
>3-6% of men worldwide suffer from it topologysisters, is this true? Other than "insane lobbying by arabs and oil magnate juden", what's stopping us from just using modern nuclear power to move into a post-energy scarcity utopia?
How can we make this a reality? If you're so smart explain how a gene gives rise to complex behaviors originating in the brain You should be able to solve this.
Data is pasted here for convenience:
01101011 01101100 01010101 11001010 00011001
01101000 10111101 10111010 01100110 01101111
11100001 01011000 00101100 11011110 10000100
01001001 01010000 00110110 10011111 01001100
01101100 10100110 11010101 00111110 01110111
00000100 00000000 01111100 00010101 Why does nobody talk about covering the moon with solar panels?
It would essentially be a micro dyson sphere except we could build it with tech we have TODAY.
It would even give us previous experience for when we decide to build an actual dyson sphere. BREAKING! We DID NOT evolve from monkeys, after all.
https://lukesmith.xyz/articles/science-of-the-gaps/ THE FIRST 314 DIGITS OF PI (if it fits)
3.1415926535897932384626433832795028841971693993751058209749445923078164062862089986280348253421170679821480865132823066470938446095505822317253594081284811174502841027019385211055596446229489549303819644288109756659334461284756482337867831652712019091456485669234603486104543266482133936072602491412737245870066063 How do I fix brain fog? I never used to be like this. Something changed in the past year. >2+2=4
>2x2=4
is this coincidence or is there a deeper meaning to this? Why is 3/3 equal to 1?
Ok, so 1/3 is 0.33333 forever. 2/3 is 0.6666 forever. So, if that's the case, why is 3/3=1 and not 0.99999 forever? Where does the last little bit get added to 3/3 to have it equal 1? >Casually destroys your scientific method Why doesn't Antarctica fall into space?it's in the bottom of the planet. "it opens doors for you" edition
Previous Thread: >>16658142
This thread exists to ask questions regarding careers associated to STEM.
>Discussion on academia-based career progression
>Discussion on penetrating industry from academia
>Or anything in relation to STEM employment or development within STEM academia!
Resources for protecting yourself from academic marxists:
>https://www.thefire.org/ (US)
>https://www.jccf.ca/ (Canada)
Information resource:
>https://sciencecareergeneral.neocities.org/
>*The Chad author is seeking additional input to diversify the content into containing all STEM fields. Said author regularly views these /scg/ threads.
No anons have answered your question? Perhaps try posting it here:
>https://academia.stackexchange.com/
An archive of some of the previous editions of /scg/:
http://warosu.org/sci/thread/15740454 Reminder that it is almost guaranteed that we live in a simulation Is this really all I need to do to have the equivalent of a math major? Where were you when you found out that the Event Horizon images of the black holes were fucking FAKE? I just learned NOW, literally just minutes ago that those niggers used fucking AI to construct the ring shape!!! I’m fucking BESIDE myself on how these fucking fraudsters are still a thing. And what’s even more fucking SICKENING is that it took two Japanese guys to call it out?? NOT ONE LAB, NOT ONE DEPARTMENT IN THE WEST felt like checking the data??? What the FUCK is going on with our society? >be me, Big Bang theory
>1922: Friedmann writes equations for expanding universe "trust the math bro"
>1929: Hubble "discovers" expansion, age of universe = 2 billion years
>geologists: "lmao Earth is older than that"
>1933: "uhhh dark matter exists now, just invisible bro"
>1970s: lithium abundance 3x lower than predicted
>cope: "stars are eating it, just trust the model"
>1998: distant supernovae too faint, universe accelerating
>"dark energytime"
>2003: universe is flat (1 in 10^62 odds by accident)
>"inflation did it" (unobserved inflaton field enters chat)
>2019: Hubble tension - expansion rate depends on where you look
>cope harder: "early dark energy? modified gravity? idk just add more parameters"
>2023: still 0 direct detection of dark matter after 90 years
>matter-antimatter asymmetry: "CP violation maybe?" (still unexplained)
>tfw your theory requires 95% undetectable magic stuff
>academia: "it's not pseudoscience we swear"
>MFW lithium problem still unsolved after 50 years At this point you would think that they have mastered rocketship technology almost perfectly. Is truth just a trick of the mind or an assertion about material reality? 1000 years of epistemology and I still don't understand what the reasonable stance is. What the fuck does it mean? Does it really mean anything? what are humans going to do once robots learn to do all the jobs? Hello Christfriends. I know you are out there. I was wondering if there is a comprehensive list of Christfriend deboonkings of carbon dating, evolution etc. I am curious about state-of-the-art Christian apologetics. How does buoyancy actually work, on a molecular billiards-ball level? The buoyant object being less dense is the common sense explanation but it leads to an absurd conclusion that a light and rigid enough container with vacuum in it should float.
I'm sort of getting the idea that gravity creates a density gradient in the outer medium, and the buoyant object is trying to find its level in that gradient, as the more dense area is hitting the object with more molecules than the less dense one. But I'm a complete uneducated retard as well. Please help. 
ever since rising from the ocean 400 million years ago, and since the fish turned into a frog, there have been "unused DNA" carried in vertebrate species
they are turned on and turned of by random mutation but the DNA is never "loss"
meanwile, insects lost ALL OF THEIR extra DNA 400 million years ago, probably due to some population bottleneck which favored smaller DNA molecules
if you compare human DNA + mice with that of several insects species you will note how insects are missing pieces of DNA in many places while human + mouse align perfectly with each other having of course some 20% of DNA different between a human and a mouse but nevertheless all the DNA is still there
in insects, nothing, huge gaps, less DNA than either human or mouse
HOWEVER the exceptions like moths, which have larger DNA than humans, are just twisted and horribly mutated ancient wasps. they have copied their COX3 gene about 1000 times and its one megabyte long, but this is not the norm in insect world, beetles dont have it like that
having one big COX3 gene doesnt mean you are having all the DNA that is missing between a human and a insect
ok but the final verdict is: a frog still has the potential of turning into a mammal if a whole lot of its unused extra DNA is turned on
a human embryo still has gill slits evolved from fish, these disappear within a few weeks and turn into ears and whatnot (this is not an example of extra DNAthough) What does the future hold for green energy in the next decades? Come up with your own explanation for the The Fermi Paradox, disregarding popular theories, which are all wrong. 
Stupid Simple Not Stupid Stupid Edition
Previous thread: >>16644201
>what is /sqt/ for?
Questions regarding maths and science. Also homework.
>where do I go for advice?
>>>/sci/scg or >>>/adv/
>where do I go for other questions and requests?
>>>/wsr/ >>>/g/sqt >>>/diy/sqt etc.
>how do I post math symbols (Latex)?
rentry.org/sci-latex-v1
>a plain google search didn't return anything, is there anything else I should try before asking the question here?
scholar.google.com
>where can I search for proofs?
proofwiki.org
>where can I look up if the question has already been asked here?
warosu.org/sci
eientei.xyz/sci
>how do I optimize an image losslessly?
trimage.org
pnggauntlet.com
>how do I find the source of an image?
images.google.com
tineye.com
saucenao.com
iqdb.org
>where can I get:
>books?
libgen.rs
annas-archive.org
stitz-zeager.com
openstax.org
activecalculus.org
>articles?
sci-hub.st
>book recs?
4chan-science.fandom.com/wiki//sci/_Wiki
math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Administrivia/booklist.html
>online courses and lectures?
khanacademy.org
>charts?
imgur.com/a/pHfMGwE
imgur.com/a/ZZDVNk1
>tables, properties and material selection?
www.engineeringtoolbox.com
www.matweb.com
www.chemspider.com
Tips for asking questions here:
>avoid replying to yourself
>ask anonymously
>recheck the Latex before posting
>ignore shitpost replies
>avoid getting into arguments
>do not tell us where is it you came from
>do not mention how [other place] didn't answer your question so you're reposting it here
>if you need to ask for clarification fifteen times in a row, try to make the sequence easy to read through
>I'm not reading your handwriting
>I'm not flipping that sideways picture
>I'm not google translating your spanish
>don't ask to ask
>don't ask for a hint if you want a solution
>xyproblem.info >In 2011, an anonymous 4chan user on the Science & Math board solved a significant mathematical problem related to superpermutations.
You realize 4chan is now forever involved in the human history of advancing human understandin in the maths and sciences, right? In a gorillion years from now 4chan will be known by name and pleb shitholes like Reddit will be all but forgotten. 4chan has ascended itself into the human story. Does anyone find it strange how the bulk of innovative scientific progress happened in the early 1900s by European physicists and then just stopped? And how they conveniently figured out how to make an Atomic bomb before the Nazis? Why do mathematicians care so much about proving something is true for ALL cases, even if say presented with unbroken evidence of proofs for a trillion^trillion^etc cases
In scientific research we're only concerned with p values for practicality, not a p value of zero. What is the worth of proving "all" over proving "most cases we as humans could ever possibly be concerned with in the worldly life of our species"
>yes I know a trillion^trillion^etc is still 0% of ALL
>yes I know that a single zero off the 1/2 mark would prove Riemann false, but if it's near the end of the universe then what worth does that "false" even have? So it's particles all the way down is it anon? >just imagine that a few years ago there were solar power deniers
were are all those losers now huh ? People are now actively trying to shove polymath Eric Weinstein into the Terrance Howard 1x1 box, and yet, he smashed "Marie Antionette" here in this faceoff. Replace Witten with EW please /sci/. He earned it, and its time to shift our focus away from the stagnated string theory nonsense. Could something like picrel occur if a pattern is discovered?
"Cryptographic Chaos and Economic Impact: A sudden vulnerability in RSA and similar systems would disrupt global cybersecurity. Financial systems, online banking, and secure communications (e.g., HTTPS) would be at risk, potentially leading to widespread data breaches and economic losses in the trillions of dollars. Governments and corporations would need to deploy new cryptographic systems rapidly, a process that could take years." Anyone up for a serious discussion about how hopeless and depressing it feels to be in academia (as compared to industry)? Why are we doing this to ourselves?
I left my highly paid IT job so that I could do grad school in linguistics. I feel like a lot of the professors are frauds. There is no respect for original thought. Coursework is rote and overwhelming. Lectures are subpar.
I presented my original research during the colloquium, and people were literally yawning. I think no one actually cares about you unless you're already some bigshot. >some men just want to watch the world pinch to zoom and travel the universe
Can't fault him for that Maths is honestly beautiful Would this work?
I bet it would work. How many more backdoors are there that we don't know about? Is there a scientific reason for why Yellow appear brighter than other colors? When you look at the color palette of Yellow, you'll only see bright shades, in fact you could argue that even dark Yellow hues can appear brighter than Red You say you're smart, how many languages do you speak? medical industry and professional discussion
>do NOT give advice
>do NOT feed the nursoids
>do NOT engage with premeds
and most importantly
>do NOT reply to psych patients
med studs, optobros, lab techs, PAs etc welcome
>Last thread
404'd lol
>>16642814 Is it used in AI or is it just a philosophy thing How do I get it to help me with medical issues? I'm seriously ill and I'm an expat in a 90IQ country with underpaid 110IQ doctors Hello, I want to share a theory I’ve been thinking about regarding black holes.
Usually, black holes are seen as cosmic endpoints where matter and information disappear. But what if black holes have an internal structure, similar to planets like Earth, with layers and processes inside?
Earth has a core, mantle, and crust, held together by gravity and heat. Could black holes also have internal layers, not just destroying matter but transforming or storing it?
Quantum physics says information cannot be lost, so maybe black holes process it differently than we think. What if they are not just destructive, but also sites where new objects, like planets or stars, begin to form?
This idea doesn’t break known physics laws but offers a different way to look at black holes.
I’m interested to hear what others think.
Thanks for reading. Fungal diseases of the what? What can 2 standard deviation IQs (130+) do that 1 standard deviations (115-129) cant? Is the field pretty much cooked? Like first Greta dumped it and ran off with Palestine, and now all the billionaire NGOs are getting smoked out. Are there even any shills left who are still getting paid to post here? Feels like the end of an era. What's the latest on radiative forcing? If you're so intellectually gifted. Why don't you have a Nobel Prize yet? How do i figure out the smallest possible rational a and b values for a right triangle with just the alpha corner? When did you realise that science is just applied statistics? When did you realize that a good chunk of science is just pondering orbs, big and small If two antennas each radiate 1 watt, how can their waves cancel in a direction — doesn’t that mean energy is lost? Can I find full course for electrical engineering with all its reading material, tests and curriculum? scientifically speaking, why are toes and feet so sexy and sexual Rare form geezercunt admits his life's work is a fail.
Refuses to acknowledge Weinstein why?
Pinch to zoom, bro. Power of 14. I can't find a job. I double majored in Physics and Math and worked as a research assistant at my Uni's physics research lab until last month (thank you Trump). I have literally nothing to do now but apply to things and continually get rejected.
What topic should I try learning in the meantime Is it even possible to refute determinism/superdetermism?
Quantum uncertainty is still too specific to be truly random or uncertain.
That things can happen at all, even quantum weirdness, implies everything is hyperdeterministic. textbook chart revised version Reminder - Earth is the only planet that we know of that has a perfect solar eclipse, since our moon happens to be about the exact same size as our sun when viewed from the Earth.
Nowhere else in the universe does this happen. How do you define energy in GR? Pseudotensors? Gimme a break. How comprehensible will alien life be? Does it even exist? Have they produced anything worthwhile in the last 75 years?
>picrel What level have you gotten to? *Blocks your path*
*Launches into a diatribe about inscrutable matrixes of floating point numbers* -Calculus: Stewart, Apostol.
-Linear Algebra: Lay, Friedberg.
-Vectorial calculus: Marsden-Tromba.
-Differential equations: Zill, Tenenbaum.
-Complex variable: Ahlfors.
-Probability and Statistics: Evans.
-Topology: Munkres.
-Analysis: Sherbert, Apostol.
-Physics: Sears.
-Thermodynamics: Callen.
-Programming Language: C, by Ivor Horton and Herbert Schildt.
-Mechanics: Landau-Lifshitz.
-Abstract Algebra: Fraleigh.
-Differential geometry: Do Carmo.
-Galois theory: Rotman.
-Electromagnetism: Reitz.
-Optics: Hecht.
-Quantum Physics: Eisberg.
-Electric circuits: Nilsson.
Discuss (other better books, opinions, experiences, etc). I'm confused about the field of electrical engineering. What is it actually about? What are the main motivations to study it?
It seems that in the US it's one of the hardest and most prestigious degrees to do. Same e.g. in Switzerland. But in many other countries, EE is where CS dropouts go. This makes me confused about it because I think EE can actually mean different things in different places. What the fuck actually is it? I have been directed to go start with reading Grob's textbook (which feels like it was written for preschoolers)
What would be recommended book order for getting into the basics signal processing and (de)modulation?
I have been thinking of skimming Grob, then reading Electronic Circuit Analysis: Basic principles and then the infamous Art of Electronics. Any recommended alternative routes?
I know that complex analysis plays crucial part in signal processing and I already have the sufficient level of it to grasp signal processing. >had Khazarian Math Magic&Milkers
>got Einstein, Hilbert, Alexandrov, Weyl, Wiener, van der Waerden, Kaplansky, Landau, Pontryagin, Hitting, Herglotz, Hasse, Dornte, Chebotaryov, Wichmann, Deuring, Fitting, Witt, Tsen, Schilling, Krull, Kothe, Holzer, Artin, Weber, Brauer, Levitzki, Siegel, Dubreil, all simping for her
>fucked all the Bourbaki members
>did OF collabs with Grace Shover Quinn, Marie Johanna Weiss, Olga Taussky-Todd, Ruth Stauffer
>supported the Bolsheviks and fucked a couple of them too
I kneel 
I am not crazy! I know he lies about those numbers being inconvenient. I knew it was 5260 feet in a mile. Just like I knew it was 231 cubic inches in a gallon. As if I could ever make such a mistake. Never. Never! I just – I just couldn’t prove it. He covered his tracks, he got that idiot at NIST to lie for him. You think this is something? You think this is bad? This? This chicanery? He’s done worse. That paper format! Are you telling me that a man just happens to fold paper like that? No! He orchestrated it! The Yuropoor! He fixed the Planck constant through a Kibble balance! And I saved him! And I shouldn’t have. I adopted the SI units in my own country! What was I thinking? He’ll never change. He’ll never change! Ever since the French revolution, always the same! Couldn’t keep his tools uncalibrated! But not our Yuropoor! Couldn’t be precious Yuropoor! Measuring them blind! And HE gets to have an internationally accepted measurement system? What a sick joke! I should’ve stopped him when I had the chance! …And you, you have to stop him! You… Does anyone have experience with pic related textbook? Supposedly it's use at Princeton for honors real analysis. Why are they so afraid of him? how many unknown mathematical solutions do you think exist in some notebook in some drawer of someone who has died 100 or more years ago? Will our civilization ever start resembling Sci-Fi someday? We were told we would get flying cars and hovering skateboards by now, I see none.
Does that mean the future is more mundane than we thought it would be? Why does spin on Fermions behave like this. We have empirical prof. Is there any theoretical explanation for it? Why is it so hard to find a job with a math phd? There are only 200,000 of us in the world? What’s the best cipher possible? Ciphers with algorithms? There is now a 1 in 23 chance a massive asteroid will hit the moon in 2032. Cool stuff! Unironically has science gone too far? Grassman numbers were able to describe fermions however why does each fermion have to have a possible boson string particle described by vectors/numbers why is it assumed that there will be another symmetry in this way? What if instead of supersymmetric particles that are too massive to be formed by particle colliders or created in space, what if there are just none and is string theory consistent with that? Wait a minute bros, how can a decade be 10 years when every "decade" is only 9 years?
As in, 1970 to 1979 is a "decade", but only 9 years Do you still find science cool or fun? Real and straight or fake and gay? If irrational numbers exist, and it can be proven, does that mean the number of digits is longer than the number of integers, since we cannot represent an irrational number as a rational number? I'm convinced the Monty Hall problem does not actually filter out brainlets, but rather, it simply confuses everybody and most people do not understand what the question is really asking, which is why so many people get it all wrong. Is it just latent bisexuality or is it something to do with hierarchy? As an incel, I have become attracted to trannies and I’m wondering why. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Orion_(nuclear_propulsion)
>Sufficient performance & thrust for literal sci-fi missions
>Expensive but economically workable
>Debate if possible to launch from earth safely, avoiding chemical rocketry entirely
>Likely possible with 20th century tech
Why does no one take nuclear pulse propulsion more seriously? Is it just politics and the apparent absurdity of it killing serious study? Could it go somewhere if people if more people were interested in its potential? >can you prove it?
>No?
Then get the fuck off my board Should the government money REALLY go to researching beans? Sounds like some woke nonsense to me. It seems they are a convergent race with Caucasians [math]\mathfrak{mg}[/math]
Jiggery-pokery edition
Talk math
Previous thread: >>16657148 Why doesn't he care WHY the hallway chirps? You've actually seen this dark matter in person? Where is it? why do scientists prefer cats to dogs? When did you realize that we’re surrounded endlessly in magic/ignorance and we’re all just too afraid to admit it? Our faults or inability to assess all things? Gravity still terrifies the average physicist since they don’t know anything about it. It isn’t a good feeling knowing it’s all still magic. ENT's ENT's ENT's ENT's ENT's ENT's ENT's ENT's
https://www.space.com/astronomy/astronomers-discover-most-powerful-cosmic-explosions-since-the-big-bang
extreme nuclear transients
Extreme Nuclear Transient
EXTREME
NUCLEAR
TRANSIENTS Why is China losing the AI race when they should be dominating it? Aren’t they closer to robots than white people? How do anti-determinists justify something coming from nothing, which is essentially what they believe when they support quantum uncertainty As someone who got tested with an 120 IQ its so funny how everyone claims (or thinks) that they are +130 IQ online. You are in for a rude awakening Not a /sci/fag by any stretch, and I am a bit conspiratorially minded, so I don't know whether I'm being naive and gullible or if the person who made this is speaking the truth. I don't know what to believe in this vile world of lies and deception. "Cow's milk can produce anemia not only because it is low in iron, but because its calcium actively interferes with iron metabolism. The addition of milk or cheese to common meals is enough to reduce iron absorption by 50-60%."
Wait, so milk is bad? Think about it. As we all know, time to an outside observer seems to slow down at immense gravitational fields. So for a massive star, collapsing into a singularity would take too long. I believe from the star's point of view, as soon as it gains an event horizon, it evaporates instantly due to Hawking Radiation, before it can even collapse fully into a singularity. Need someone to weigh in, because I've been thinking about this for a good 10 years now. Why do we only send objects in that one direction into space? Why dont we send a satellite the opposite way? Or even straight up or down? What's even below the earth in space? How could it have been fixed if it was discovered in time? [math] |\psi\rangle = \alpha |\text{Brigitte}\rangle + \beta |\text{Jean\text{-}Michel}\rangle [/math] ...So has there been any studies about whether or not bayesian inference must be trained / is not part of the lizard brain pattern matching machine?
Because, and maybe this is a subtle point, if millions of years ago you saw a lion in a bush once and barely survived it seems to me it makes sense to thereafter always assume there is a lion in said bush, those people would survive and pass on their genes. While formally the events Lion was in bush and Lion is in bush now may be independent or indeed be negatively correlated it is not like you would survive going to that bush to check and determine the chances as a frequentist. So shouldn't the frequentists have died out?
So why do people get this wrong? Do people really think that biological variance just stops once it reaches the brain? Isn’t this dangerous logic? Let’s say everything everywhere, every when, exists all at once. All goods and all bads. A big fat annoying “multiverse”, or “omniverse”, or whatever pretentious word you want to use.
By such a point, is existence deterministic or one of pure probability? Assuming travelling to the past is possible, wouldn’t that confirm the existence of the multiverse? Determinism and probabilism are the same I'm a layman so please be gentle with me.
So what I understand is if you shoot electrons at the double slit, they'll be detected on the other side at random points by an experimental setup and if you try to fit a curve around these points the best possible one is given by wave mechanics. Am I correct until this point?
What I don't understand is why do physicists assume this wave is real and is a wave of probability. The wave itself feels like a mathematical artifact and treating it as probability density function a neat mathematically trick. Just cause you don't know at which random point on the wave is the electron detected before the measurement doesn't mean it only exists as a probability distribution of possible configurations before the measurement. How would we scientifically solve the oil supply problem? Oil is running out and we only have 30 years before it's all used up and production is set to fall very soon Anyone think decoherence might be a retrocausal artifact of eigenstate bifurcation when mapped across a non-Euclidean substrate? Like if you apply tensor-refracted heuristics in a quasi-Banach space, you get pseudo-isomorphic flux behavior that doesn’t even obey Born-rule constraints.
Could this imply hidden gauge invariants in a fractal inertia frame? Has anyone tried simulating this on an anisotropic quaternion array? If language is the fundamental constituent of human experience, how do we address the fact that language is structured?
If language is structured by "pictures", like Wittgensteins argues in The Tractatus, then these schematisms are what's foundational, not the linguistic expressions that make use of them, and Wittgenstein has done nothing but extend Kant barely an inch.
If language is structured by its use and human relations, as he argues in later work, then the realm of experience is undressed, and we've only begged the question.
Wtf am I missing? What is the scientific phenomenon behind this? If someone denies the existence of IQ, is that a red flag that they’re retarded?
>Gee, who would have thought that biological variance would stop once it reaches the brain! Knowing that the US deserts came about extremely rapidly, almost seemingly overnight from wetlands only a few thousand years ago, it got me thinking, would it be possible to turn US SW deserts, back into some sort of forested envionment? China's embarked on massive desert reclamation and has been largely successful, could a similar project succeed in the US? Did he really invent white people? Why aren't you white boi scientists mentioning him in your studies and shit? >you all look like chimp
long hair , colored eyes What's the proof that 1+1=2? So what the hell was this? https://advanced.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/advs.202414507
https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202414507
Has anyone an idea where to download Difface? Does quantum uncertainty prove that something comes from nothing? Have we found the Root of everything? In 2025, the US has cancelled Nancy Roman's telescope, cancelled Mars Sample Return, cancelled Lunar Gateway, Venus's atmospheric probe, cancelled LHWO, cancelled UOP, and a broad 50% budget cut.
But people were saying it's okay, because SpaceX was still a thing, with their Falcons and their developing Starship, as well as their Dragon capsules.
But now apparently the plug is being pulled on Dragon? How will the astronauts aboard the ISS come back home now? How will astronauts be sent back up there? can facial attractiveness be measured? it seems regardless of race/phenotype the facial measurements are about the same numbers did his theory of geometric unity solve phisics? Who are the most underrated scientists/mathematicians of our time? Pic related does incredibly work. What about using organic matter like stem cells for brain-organoid-based computing?
Let's lean back and see what happens! How far away are we from full biological transition from male human to female human? Just wondering when trans will no longer exist because the problem is solved. >United States founded 1775
>1775-2000 equals 25
>-2000 pluss 2025 equals 25
>25 plus 25 equals 50
>1800s and 1900s is 200 years
>American is 250 years old
>however...
>in just 25 years it will be 2075 and American will be 300 years old (250 plus 25 somehow equals 300??)
What the fuck am l missing /sci/?? i don't know calculus, so i am training my neural networks by randomly moving each weight up and down and seeing if the loss went down Is it normal to take multiple attempts to get something mathematically? Or is it proof that I'm not cut out for a job that requires math?
I do this I feel like once a week in every math class I go to where it's an oscillation between "It's so over!" "We're so back." "We were never gone" "Fuck it, we ball."
I don't understand how someone without brain damage can be so lost in dealing with math.
Should I just enter the physical trades or become a clown instead? What is the scientific reason for why women like tall, high pitched voice, broad shoulder, with well structured skulls, smooth skin as opposed to men who have high pitched voices, narrow shoulders, big hips, recessed mandibles and have acne? I don't want to hear about any evolutionary biology nonsense. I want only realistic scientist theories, evolutionary biology is not one of them and the subset of Darwinism. I refuse those arguments. Evolution doesn't make sense considering it says we were once ugly looking monkeys which doesn't translate to why females like traits that have nothing to do with people that look like short hairy looking baboons with jutting mandibles. If anything they'd be scared shitless if they'd see someone like that. >but this one study-
It’s wrong.
>but they found that-
No they didn’t.
>look at the evide-
Don’t need to.
Science has spoken. My son has ASD and is 8, recently he's become obsessed with math. He's created or learened (not sure how) some sort if counting method with his hands where he represents numbers up to I think 100. He started of asking me simple math questions like addition "what's 8+2 daddy" and grew into more multiplication of bigger and bigger numbers. Now he's asking me what 8 to the power of 7 is and about permutations... I'm not smart or good at math, me and my wife are average or worse academically but when I punch the shit he's asking me into a calculator and ask him the answer he's usually correct. I don't know how to help develop this or even if I should or just let him carry onon his own? Unfortunately asking him about day to day shit is kind if pointless as he's off in his world completely and just wants to draw and make stories and characters up so asking him how he's doing this has been completely fruitless
Any suggestions? ELIZA won a 2021 Legacy Peabody Award. A 2023 preprint reported that ELIZA beat OpenAI's GPT-3.5, the model used by ChatGPT at the time, in a Turing test study.
Eliza was made in 1964.
Google is a scam. what's your MBTI and what sort of activity/hobby do you like relating to science and math? for me INTP, I like make schizoprehic math "art" that has no point, but looks concerning but cool... 
