>>16679107
>So experiments show that local hidden variable theories are not consistent with physical reality.
That’s completely false
Only bells inequality which is disproven claims that (do it yourself the error is blatant, I have a vested interests in the stalling of human technology, for me to help especially without getting credit for it on an anonymous image board would be a massive conflict of interest for me)
There’s also the quantum eraser and delayed quantum eraser which unlike the polariser experiments go from making one mistake to being made by literal apes, those experiments are complete nonsense from start to finish, just read the papers if you have a brain you’ll spot all the logic defying things they do and conclude

>Even if particles had some definite properties, they can instantly be effected by some measurement on the other side of the universe. Is that not weird?
you’re talking about something completely different and no it’s not weird at all
The exact same thing works on a macroscopic scale, again my lips are tied but the analogy is very direct, remember they need a particle to be completely undosturbed... aka you just need conservation of properties like spin.... big whoop, woah that’s so crazy, objects in motions will remain in motion, woah, that’s like, ground breaking science in antiquity with the first siege engines bro!

Back | Go to board

Board:

/sci/

Thread:

Is it even possible to refute determinism/superdetermism?Quantum uncertainty is still too specific to be truly random or uncertain. That…

Is it even possible to refute determinism/superdetermism?
Quantum uncertainty is still too specific to be truly random or uncertain.
That…