>>16487026
>Fahrenheit is absolutely more intuitive for the layman than Celsius
I repeat. It's intuitive to you because you're a dumb American. Nobody in my country understands your silly units. What's intuitive or not is entirely up to your upbringing.
>0-100 is obviously a more intuitive scale than -18-38 and it's more granular in regards to whole numbers
I agree, 0C to 100C is way more intuitive.
>Nearly everywhere on Earth falls within the 0-100 range on average.
kek now that's a bold claim. So we must conclude an average forest has 0 to 100 trees? Peculiar.
>less so than Fahrenheit
less so than what, 0F? It regularly goes below 0F in Siberia, so it's not intuitive to them. And I'm sorry that negative numbers break your intuition. Must be hard being an American.
>100 in Celsius being based around boiling is nonsensical because nowhere that people live ever reaches that ambient temperature
And? Are you incapable of understanding concepts beyond what's right in front of you? Never boiled water before? Ah, I remembered. Americans don't have kettles.

Back | Go to board

Board:

/sci/

Thread:

Celsius lovers be like "no no trust me it's better"