>>16579015
is no one actually a scientist on this board, there is no "curing" aging, there is life extension and health span, maximizing years without chronic disease that depends on low hanging fruit that no one bothers with out of sheer laziness but we all know those boring basics. But to get close to "curing" aging we need to do one thing
>refute the vitalist hypothesis
all the current research is built on shoddy ground because we fundamentally don't understand how cells work, if we can create a cell, a single most primitive cell, would guide us for everything else as a reference implementation for how our own cells work. Until this is done, don't bother with snake oil. Sure we'll figure out how to be healthy at 90 and live sickly until 140 for more people but that's only by min maxxing everything boring first and unfortunately no one cares for this, not even anyone reading this right now because you know browsing the internet like this site is net negative on your mind and health (blue light disrupting sleep to the ideas here encouraging bad thinking)

Back | Go to board

Board:

/sci/

Thread:

Are we going to need nanobots in order to cure aging?