>>16584773
>These are meaningless assumptions and there's no reason for such random variables to exist in the hidden variable theory.
It seems like you misunderstood. A(a,\lambda) represents the results of Alice's measurement of spin in direction a, and likewise B is for Bob. A and B are the results of experiments they are not hidden variables. It is an experimental fact that you only get two possible values for the spin no matter which axis you measure it, and that if Alice and Bob choose the same axis their results will be opposite.

The hidden variable is \lambda. The whole point of the hidden variable hypothesis is that if we somehow could know \lambda we could know the results of the experiment no matter which axis Alice and Bob choose. Bell showed that this doesn't actually give the right correlations.

Back | Go to board

Board:

/sci/

Thread:

So Bell's inequalities disprove the hidden variables interpretations of quantum mechanics?How many interpretations are possible now? Is Many…

So Bell's inequalities disprove the hidden variables interpretations of quantum mechanics?
How many interpretations are possible now? Is Many…