>>16638763
> Does your framework predict anything that I can measure?

Yes, there are datasets and anomalies posted online, the equations actually resolved a lot of them, but more fine tuning is needed.

> Also, how did you resolve redshift, that is to ask how old is the universe?

To put it simply, Resolution Decay causes Red Shift (resolution loss over vast space), and this creates the illusion of a Doppler Effect and spacetime stretching out into oblivion from every fucking direction possible.

As for black holes, the event horizon is not a boundary of infinite redshift, but the asymptotic limit of resolution decay, where information transmission approaches zero resolution fidelity, but never fully vanishes.

As for the real age of the universe, that’s something you can actually produce statistically, but going by the ratio of heavy elements produced by solar fusion, you’re looking at about 20 billion years.

This number increases when you account for the current number of nebula forming into stars, and if you account for black holes which effectively function as giant recycling machines (they break heavy particles down into Hawking Radiation which later transforms into Hydrogen), well, I’m not going to say out loud how old the universe really is… You do the math on that one.

But, you have to remember, this is just pure theory, and I’m a retard posting on 4chan.

Back | Go to board

Board:

/sci/

Thread:

Heim's mass equation predicts numerous mesons without quarks.