>>16657233
>That they could stagnate isn't considered probable.
By whom? Every reasonable researcher considers this option.
>So them not being able to bang out workable, secure code isn't seen as an issue as the newer models will quickly fix those shortcomings.
The reason for this is that we've seen them improve at an impressive pace at that task. Your whole post comes across as an attempt to morph "is possible" into "will happen".
>Just like the promise of SQL nearly half a century ago to free managers from the need to hire programmers to retrieve data, the mba types are sure this is the time when they can have zero cost, infinite work assistants that will implement all their business fantasies for them.
No, it's not "just like" because the technologies involved are vastly different. Is this another one of those cases of assuming the contrarian position is the right one, and therefore whatever you can conjure up to support a contrarian position is automatically a good argument?

Back | Go to board

Board:

/sci/

Thread:

Once ai will be able to do programming better than human, which skill will replace it for high salary jobs?