>>148588080
>I get the feeling we both have our own wildly different definitions here
No. I have the correct definition and you have a mistaken one.
>the other anon responding to said anon gets emotional and makes a claim (truthful or not) that is beside the point of what the first anon was trying to say in the first place
Yes, this is not a strawman argument at all. What you're describing would be called a non-sequitur.

And in this case I'm not convinced that it is a non-sequitur, because Sven's presenting a an example that contradicts your generalization.

Back | Go to board

Board:

/sp/

Thread:

Why is soccer the only sport where the fans will riot , attack players and get matches cancelled?