>>94377051
>Mean while both 4e and 5e individually have surpassed it in options and classes. 5e nearly doubles the amount of races and subraces, and way more books
>5e
>The game with a single digit number of books and like <20 races, <50 if you count setting specifics
>more books than 3e (literally hundreds of books)
>more races than 3e (literally hundreds of 1HD LA0 races thousands and thousands of playable races not even getting into templates)

>>94380531
>The funny part is, I think that, since al the fiddly bits actually get me more engaged with the game, I've been improving as a roleplayer since I began playing
Obviously. It's the only(?) game with any sense of versimilitude because there actually are rules for how things work instead of having your friend try to spitball about real world physics in a game that obviously pays no heed to real world physics like you did in AD&D.

>>94377393
You can climb into people's assholes (and it's RAI, you can grapple people 2 size categories smaller then you, why would someone who is squeezing into a tight space for a diminuitive creature not be able to be carred along?) but the bullshit about using enlarge person to burst through them with a strength check wouldn't do anything. First of all, even if we pretend it worked, bursting through creatures digestive systems violently in D&D is well, well, well established in the rules. It doesn't do any additional damage besides what is inflicted by the attack. Secondly, people aren't leather. RAW, you can't really destroy corpses (specifics notwithstanding ofc) because they don't actually stop following creature rules so they can go to -NAN hitpoints and still not ever be 'destroyed'.

Back | Go to board

Board:

/tg/

Thread:

I miss 3.5...