>>94811002
Quickly off the top of my head.
>Nobles
should be focused on as smaller groups or divided by influence.
>Anti-magic faction
Should be aiming for control and oversight rather than genocide, especially outwardly. It means much better PR, especially if magic can do things that help common people or nobility.
>Hermit Mages
Why is this a faction, how are they organized, do they really have a unified goal? Not saying it's impossible but this group seems too individualistic to be a "faction".
>Crime Lords, Thief's Guild, Guardsmen
Consider focusing on the trichotomy of law enforcement, organized crime, and unorganized crime, rather than trying to work with what appears to be two separate organized crime groups. As I'm assuming if they're crime "lords" they already have a gang underneath them and that's exactly what a thief's guild is.
>Order of Reason, Gentleman's Club
I'll need explanations for these two but on the surface their goals sound kind of stupid. Why and how are they "preventing new knowledge" and "hoarding knowledge" respectively.
>Scientists, Shamans, Industrials, Revolutionaries
Who, how, why? Too nebulous you can have groups that have these as goals but they need something that actually ties them together beyond a title.
>Anti-Tech, Tech Hater
Gonna need a pretty good explanation as to why there are enough primitivists in your presumably fantasy medieval/renaissance setting to make a full faction. Actual primitive cultures sure, but actual primitives don't usually shun new technologies and ideas. Especially the ones that want power and influence.

Just some stuff that I thought of while looking through the list. I'd like to make clear that I'm not trying to be an asshole. Just trying to encourage critical thinking.

>>94811019

Also echoing this anon's sentiment in an RPG most of the time less is more. I'd say 4 to 9 at the absolute most. Splitting them up geographically when you have more than 5.

Back | Go to board

Board:

/tg/

Thread:

Cool faction based conflict?