>>704692092
Probably not.
There was a flicker of hope for a minute.
>DLSS was really cool for getting games to look good.
>Frame gen could have been an answer for 30fps being turned to 60FPS on lower end cards
>and all the stuff that benefits consumers would have been cool
But what did we get instead...
>RTX MANDITORY CAUSE WE FIRED THE RASTORIZED LIGHT TEAMS AND WANT YOU TO PAY THE DIFFERENCE
>YOU NEED AI FRAME GEN TO EVEN GET THIS RUNNING AT 30 FRAMES CAUSE WE FIRED THE TEAM THAT OPTIMIZES THE GAME, AND THE INPUT LAG MEANS YOU NEED A BETTER CONTROLLER
>8K GAMING? ARE YOU CRAZY?! WE CAN'T GET 4Ķ TO WORK RIGHT!
>IF YOUR GRAPHICS CARD FEELS AND SOUNDS LIKE A HAIR DRYER AND SPIKES YOUR ELECTRIC BILL THAT MEANS IT'S SAFE AND EFFECTIVE!
>>704692228
Yeah, it doesn't. Tekken AI matches are dogshit. NPC dialouge sounds retarded as Google AI RESULTS.
But don't be surprised if they try and force it in to get more data to sell to AI faggots.
>>704692513
AI had some promise in taking an amateur indie game to go toe to toe with tripple A games, but most people are dogshit at game design (see mario maker) so it will just lead to astronomical levels of Shovelware

Back | Go to board

Board:

/v/

Thread:

Do you think AI could help to improve the quality of video games?