>>711851518
but why would I pay 200€ more for a card that's only marginally better in RT?

>>711860964
>5080
that's shit literally costs over 1300€ and it's barely better than the 4080 Super which is like what? 10% better than the 9070XT?
might as well get a used 4080 Super under 1000€
hell for 1500€ which is what the best 5080 models cost, I'm sure you could find a used 4090

>>711861138
>Costs about the same or even more depending on the country
got my 9070XT PURE for 700€
while the cheapest 5070Ti is still 900€

Back | Go to board

Board:

/v/

Thread:

>even with the 9070XT release AMD managed to lose market share, now down to 8%, against Nvdia and their jeet drivers blackscreen 5000 cards getting…