>>57234270
>genwunners are obnoxious, they ignore all the problems of gen 1 and all the good things of later games
->
>gen 1 was pretty great for being the first one, and I think some of its appeal was lost in the later games

>gen 5 was the first bad gen, its pokemon are ugly, they're ripoffs of kantomons, the region is a circle, and the sprites are ugly
->
>gen 5 was good in a lot of other respects, i like a lot of the gen 5 versions of mons better than the originals, and i do like a lot of the sprites

>HMs should be removed, they're cumbersome and no one likes them
->
>HMs are clunky and should be refined but i like the idea, and your team should help you navigate the overworld in some way.

>definitive editions like emerald are always better, they improve so much it's like the originals are beta versions
->
>there are really not that many improvements, and inevitably they do something i don't like, making the originals worth playing too

>they should add more eeveelutions
->
>adding more eeveelutions would be a sign that TPC has given up trying and are just doing fan service

>these new encounter/evolution methods are so unintuitive, why can't it just be simple
->
>when done right, they can add a lot of character to an otherwise forgettable mon

>legendaries and pseudo-lengendaries shouldn't be used in playthroughs, they're too powerful
->
>they are balanced by their catch difficulty, and high level-up and evo requirements. Plus they are just fun to use. If I like their design I won't feel bad about using them

>genwunners are the worst fans
->
>coomers and furries are the worst fans

>what >>57234290 said

Back | Go to board

Board:

/vp/

Thread:

What are some Pokémon opinions you had that you've changed your mind on?