>>11516891
>No matter how you see it, it has less RAM.
It didn't, not only did it have more total RAM but it let developers split it how they wanted. It's asinine to say the N64 had too little RAM to do CDs.

>And the GPU will need more memory than PS1 GPU.
BS, you are going to need more than "no z buffer" to justify that since the Saturn barely had more. Are you also forgetting that we had 16 bit CD systems before the N64 that had considerably less RAM?

>As I said Z-buffering takes more memory than the lack thereof
Not that much more, at this point you are arguing that the N64 could not do CDs because it had a Z buffer while the PS1 did not, you are just digging yourself deeper and deeper.

>Wrong. Less RAM means less RAM
Wrong, unified RAM gives you more RAM for what actually needs it. Having 1.5MB of video RAM is useless if you are only using half of it but are running out of work RAM.

>No sound RAM either
Do you have any idea how little that matters? That was in the KILOBYTES for other systems, and only because they sliced their subsystems up like it was a goddamn pizza.

>It has no CD buffer that a CD system would need
Guess what? A CD buffer would have been on the drive itself, not the console.

>It practically has less RAM than Saturn
Wrong

>and slightly more than PS1
Significantly more

>B-b-but Z-buffering
THAT BARELY TAKES UP SPACE COMPARED TO LITERALLY EVERYTHING ELSE YOU FUCKING MORON

Holy fuck you are beyond a doubt one of the bigger idiots I have ever seen refuse to admit that they were wrong on a total ass-pull argument they made and rather than admit it, keep digging themselves so deep that you are in fucking China by this point.

Here is a tl;dr for you
THE N64 WASN'T A CARTRIDGE CONSOLE BECAUSE OF LACK OF RAM FOR A CD

It's insane that you are still trying to dig yourself deeper by just being even more and more wrong the more you attempt to argue your insane stance.

Back | Go to board

Board:

/vr/

Thread:

WTF was Nintendo thinking?