>>39650889
>Is there a reason you're posting images constantly with young boys?
They are not young boys, they are men. Just because they are not YOUR version of men doesn't make them young boys - it just makes you ignorant.
>Too old and you get the sage, death, or time.

Correct.

>Too young and you get the Puer Aeternus; the Peter Pan character who embodies the tyranny of youth and it's short-sighted thinking and goals applied over a long stretch of existential time.

Incorrect. The entire distaste that has been focused around the young male is one born entirely out of past evolutionary fitness. That is it. There was no time nor ability to be the starry-eyed, soft-featured male with boyish features because reality was too harsh, and nature even more so. And so you need a man of utility - a man of muscle built for purpose and THAT'S IT. A sapient species whom is unable to move past the man of utility is a species that is doomed, as they are stuck in the past with their men, unable to actualize them in neotenized paths of beauty and innocence - the male is eternally stuck being and old, utilitarian beast of burden for his societies and the women he "serves" - not allowed to just be a boy with youthful vigor and the imagination of a child-god. The same kind of imagination, btw, needed - USED to make the many invaluable inventions of which you are directly benefitting from RIGHT NOW as you type your messages and read mine.

The entire metaphor around Peter Pan was simple - to not shirk yourself from responsibilities oh which you are beholden to - and that lesson was being taught to WENDY, THE FEMALE, not to PETER. Time after time again I run into insufferable imbeciles like you, who egregiously misinterpret entire aspects of ontology and then feel like you're some enlightened folk. Utterly content in your ignorance and self-stultification.

Back | Go to board

Board:

/x/

Thread:

What is the Divine Masculine to you?