>>39656353
>In the age we live in our intellect is very powerful but our intuition, not so much.
Asspull

>When you hold on with your intellect that god is ineffable it implies God is unknowable, but that couldnt be further from the truth.
You're just saying "i don't agree with you" but with extra words and not providing anything new. You defend the idea of God being knowable through intellect, so it should be easy then for you to provide an accurate description of God, since according to you its nature follows our logical models.

>>39656362
>(because we are made in his image)
This is probably the most misinterpreted piece of text in any religious text, ever.

Back | Go to board

Board:

/x/

Thread:

If we base ourselves on the fact that God is a being that cannot be described with words and has no name, that implies that every God of every God of…